CVV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of 2.48% compared to CVD Equipment's net margin of 0.21%. CVD Equipment's return on equity of -16.7% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 5.46%.

CVD Equipment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 289.29%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 144.14%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Broadwind, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Broadwind.

CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.693% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.872%.

CVD Equipment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CVD Equipment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CVD Equipment quarterly revenues are $8.2M, which are smaller than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $35.5M. CVD Equipment's net income of $203K is higher than Broadwind's net income of $74K. Notably, CVD Equipment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadwind's PE ratio is 13.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVD Equipment is 1.19x versus 0.27x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intevac has a net margin of 2.48% compared to CVD Equipment's net margin of -7.62%. CVD Equipment's return on equity of -16.7% beat Intevac's return on equity of -7.77%.

CVD Equipment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 289.29%. On the other hand Intevac has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 96.08%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Intevac, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Intevac.

CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.693% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intevac has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.734%.

CVD Equipment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intevac offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CVD Equipment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intevac pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CVD Equipment quarterly revenues are $8.2M, which are smaller than Intevac quarterly revenues of $28.5M. CVD Equipment's net income of $203K is higher than Intevac's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, CVD Equipment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intevac's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVD Equipment is 1.19x versus 1.45x for Intevac. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 2.48% compared to CVD Equipment's net margin of -161.83%. CVD Equipment's return on equity of -16.7% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

CVD Equipment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 289.29%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.693% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.201%.

CVD Equipment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CVD Equipment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CVD Equipment quarterly revenues are $8.2M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. CVD Equipment's net income of $203K is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, CVD Equipment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVD Equipment is 1.19x versus 11.67x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 2.48% compared to CVD Equipment's net margin of -15.94%. CVD Equipment's return on equity of -16.7% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -15.79%.

CVD Equipment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 289.29%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 238.49%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than SIFCO Industries, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than SIFCO Industries.

CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.693% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.531%.

CVD Equipment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CVD Equipment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CVD Equipment quarterly revenues are $8.2M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $2.8M. CVD Equipment's net income of $203K is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$443K. Notably, CVD Equipment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVD Equipment is 1.19x versus 0.35x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.