BWEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CVD Equipment Corp. has a net margin of 16.87% compared to Broadwind, Inc.'s net margin of 5.18%. Broadwind, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat CVD Equipment Corp.'s return on equity of -0.73%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 34.16%. On the other hand CVD Equipment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 383.97%. Given that CVD Equipment Corp. has higher upside potential than Broadwind, Inc., analysts believe CVD Equipment Corp. is more attractive than Broadwind, Inc..

Broadwind, Inc. has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.67% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment Corp. has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.472%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are larger than CVD Equipment Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Broadwind, Inc.'s net income of $7.5M is higher than CVD Equipment Corp.'s net income of $384K. Notably, Broadwind, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.70x while CVD Equipment Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind, Inc. is 0.48x versus 0.80x for CVD Equipment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 16.87% compared to Broadwind, Inc.'s net margin of -625.04%. Broadwind, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -98.43%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 34.16%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 240.75%. Given that Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Broadwind, Inc., analysts believe Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Broadwind, Inc..

Broadwind, Inc. has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.67% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.132%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Broadwind, Inc.'s net income of $7.5M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$7.4M. Notably, Broadwind, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.70x while Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind, Inc. is 0.48x versus 11.50x for Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Power Solutions International, Inc. has a net margin of 16.87% compared to Broadwind, Inc.'s net margin of 13.55%. Broadwind, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat Power Solutions International, Inc.'s return on equity of 123.72%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 34.16%. On the other hand Power Solutions International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $121.76 which suggests that it could grow by 107.49%. Given that Power Solutions International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Broadwind, Inc., analysts believe Power Solutions International, Inc. is more attractive than Broadwind, Inc..

Broadwind, Inc. has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.67% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Solutions International, Inc. has a beta of 2.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.541%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Power Solutions International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Power Solutions International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are smaller than Power Solutions International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $203.8M. Broadwind, Inc.'s net income of $7.5M is lower than Power Solutions International, Inc.'s net income of $27.6M. Notably, Broadwind, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.70x while Power Solutions International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind, Inc. is 0.48x versus 2.00x for Power Solutions International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 16.87% compared to Broadwind, Inc.'s net margin of 14.95%. Broadwind, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.15%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 34.16%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 93.35%. Given that SIFCO Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Broadwind, Inc., analysts believe SIFCO Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Broadwind, Inc..

Broadwind, Inc. has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.67% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.961%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.1M. Broadwind, Inc.'s net income of $7.5M is higher than SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s net income of $3.3M. Notably, Broadwind, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.70x while SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind, Inc. is 0.48x versus 0.47x for SIFCO Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.