BWEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CVD Equipment Corp. has a net margin of 16.87% compared to Broadwind, Inc.'s net margin of 5.18%. Broadwind, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat CVD Equipment Corp.'s return on equity of -0.73%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.4%. On the other hand CVD Equipment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 305.06%. Given that CVD Equipment Corp. has higher upside potential than Broadwind, Inc., analysts believe CVD Equipment Corp. is more attractive than Broadwind, Inc..

Broadwind, Inc. has a beta of 1.367, which suggesting that the stock is 36.685% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment Corp. has a beta of 0.889, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.092%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are larger than CVD Equipment Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Broadwind, Inc.'s net income of $7.5M is higher than CVD Equipment Corp.'s net income of $384K. Notably, Broadwind, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.66x while CVD Equipment Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind, Inc. is 0.54x versus 0.96x for CVD Equipment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 16.87% compared to Broadwind, Inc.'s net margin of -2553.07%. Broadwind, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.27%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.4%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 250.47%. Given that Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Broadwind, Inc., analysts believe Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Broadwind, Inc..

Broadwind, Inc. has a beta of 1.367, which suggesting that the stock is 36.685% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.393, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.261%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $424K. Broadwind, Inc.'s net income of $7.5M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$10.8M. Notably, Broadwind, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.66x while Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind, Inc. is 0.54x versus 19.29x for Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Power Solutions International, Inc. has a net margin of 16.87% compared to Broadwind, Inc.'s net margin of 13.55%. Broadwind, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat Power Solutions International, Inc.'s return on equity of 123.72%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.4%. On the other hand Power Solutions International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $110.17 which suggests that it could grow by 72.01%. Given that Power Solutions International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Broadwind, Inc., analysts believe Power Solutions International, Inc. is more attractive than Broadwind, Inc..

Broadwind, Inc. has a beta of 1.367, which suggesting that the stock is 36.685% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Solutions International, Inc. has a beta of 2.024, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.385%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Power Solutions International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Power Solutions International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are smaller than Power Solutions International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $203.8M. Broadwind, Inc.'s net income of $7.5M is lower than Power Solutions International, Inc.'s net income of $27.6M. Notably, Broadwind, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.66x while Power Solutions International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind, Inc. is 0.54x versus 2.19x for Power Solutions International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 16.87% compared to Broadwind, Inc.'s net margin of -2.15%. Broadwind, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.76%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.4%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 123.42%. Given that SIFCO Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Broadwind, Inc., analysts believe SIFCO Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Broadwind, Inc..

Broadwind, Inc. has a beta of 1.367, which suggesting that the stock is 36.685% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.875, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.478%.

Broadwind, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind, Inc. quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.8M. Broadwind, Inc.'s net income of $7.5M is higher than SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$491K. Notably, Broadwind, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.66x while SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind, Inc. is 0.54x versus 0.40x for SIFCO Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.