NDGPY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gulf Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s net margin of -155.77%. Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s return on equity of 1.96% beat Gulf Resources's return on equity of -49.67%.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gulf Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2156.81%. Given that Gulf Resources has higher upside potential than Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings), analysts believe Gulf Resources is more attractive than Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings).

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gulf Resources has a beta of 0.357, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.256%.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gulf Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gulf Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gulf Resources quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s net income of -- is lower than Gulf Resources's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.15x while Gulf Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) is 0.21x versus 0.53x for Gulf Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IT Tech Packaging has a net margin of -- compared to Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s net margin of -7.87%. Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s return on equity of 1.96% beat IT Tech Packaging's return on equity of -5.89%.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IT Tech Packaging has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, analysts believe Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -0.753, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.329%.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IT Tech Packaging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IT Tech Packaging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IT Tech Packaging quarterly revenues of $25.1M. Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s net income of -- is lower than IT Tech Packaging's net income of -$2M. Notably, Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.15x while IT Tech Packaging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) is 0.21x versus 0.04x for IT Tech Packaging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ReTo Eco-Solutions has a net margin of -- compared to Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s net margin of --. Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s return on equity of 1.96% beat ReTo Eco-Solutions's return on equity of -85.96%.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ReTo Eco-Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has higher upside potential than ReTo Eco-Solutions, analysts believe Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) is more attractive than ReTo Eco-Solutions.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ReTo Eco-Solutions has a beta of 1.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.578%.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ReTo Eco-Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ReTo Eco-Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ReTo Eco-Solutions quarterly revenues of --. Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s net income of -- is lower than ReTo Eco-Solutions's net income of --. Notably, Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.15x while ReTo Eco-Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) is 0.21x versus 0.21x for ReTo Eco-Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Origin Agritech has a net margin of -- compared to Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s net margin of --. Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s return on equity of 1.96% beat Origin Agritech's return on equity of --.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Origin Agritech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has higher upside potential than Origin Agritech, analysts believe Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) is more attractive than Origin Agritech.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Agritech has a beta of 1.602, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.152%.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Origin Agritech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Agritech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Origin Agritech quarterly revenues of --. Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s net income of -- is lower than Origin Agritech's net income of --. Notably, Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.15x while Origin Agritech's PE ratio is 4.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) is 0.21x versus 0.76x for Origin Agritech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.