Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
51
NDGPY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$14.45
Seasonality move
:
9.1%
Day range:
$14.45 - $14.45
52-week range:
$6.60 - $15.67
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
13.88x
P/S ratio:
0.38x
P/B ratio:
0.47x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
225
1-year change:
85.73%
Market cap:
$3.4B
Revenue:
$9B
EPS (TTM):
$1.05
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDGPY
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HUIHY
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MOAEF
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDGPY
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.
|
$14.45 | -- | $3.4B | 13.88x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.38x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
|
$4.08 | -- | $5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 26.18x |
|
HUIHY
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
$14.60 | -- | $943.1M | 62.17x | $0.28 | 0.53% | 1.99x |
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
$0.15 | -- | $1.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.25x |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MOAEF
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.
|
$0.07 | -- | $13.3M | 0.06x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDGPY
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.
|
58.39% | 1.078 | -- | 0.72x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
|
-- | 0.108 | -- | -- |
|
HUIHY
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
1.74% | 0.107 | -- | 7.34x |
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
0.6% | -2.569 | 0.46% | 4.98x |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MOAEF
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.
|
401.01% | 0.903 | -- | 0.19x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDGPY
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.82% | 1.96% | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HUIHY
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.74% | 0.76% | -- | -- |
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
-$16K | -$1.6M | -94.91% | -97.17% | -143.68% | -$594.8K |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MOAEF
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -68.67% | -- | -- | -- |
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NDGPY or CHNR?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.96% beat China Natural Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.-- -- $16.1B CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NDGPY or CHNR?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Natural Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Natural Resources, Inc., analysts believe Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Natural Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is NDGPY or CHNR More Risky?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.305, which suggesting that the stock is 69.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Natural Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.104, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.592%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDGPY or CHNR?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Natural Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Natural Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDGPY or CHNR?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Natural Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Natural Resources, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.88x while China Natural Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. is 0.38x versus 26.18x for China Natural Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.0.38x 13.88x -- -- CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.26.18x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NDGPY or HUIHY?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.96% beat Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.-- -- $16.1B HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.-- -- $2B -
What do Analysts Say About NDGPY or HUIHY?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Huabao International Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Huabao International Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NDGPY or HUIHY More Risky?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.305, which suggesting that the stock is 69.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.335, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.531%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDGPY or HUIHY?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Huabao International Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huabao International Holdings Ltd. pays out 54.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDGPY or HUIHY?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Huabao International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.88x while Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 62.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. is 0.38x versus 1.99x for Huabao International Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.0.38x 13.88x -- -- HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.1.99x 62.17x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NDGPY or INHD?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -142.36%. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.96% beat Inno Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -97.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.-- -- $16.1B INHDInno Holdings, Inc.-1.47% -$0.30 $8.3M -
What do Analysts Say About NDGPY or INHD?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inno Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Inno Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Inno Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is NDGPY or INHD More Risky?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.305, which suggesting that the stock is 69.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inno Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDGPY or INHD?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inno Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inno Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDGPY or INHD?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inno Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Inno Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.88x while Inno Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. is 0.38x versus 0.25x for Inno Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.0.38x 13.88x -- -- INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0.25x -- $1.1M -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns NDGPY or LUD?
Luda Technology Group has a net margin of -- compared to Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.96% beat Luda Technology Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.-- -- $16.1B LUDLuda Technology Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NDGPY or LUD?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Luda Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Luda Technology Group, analysts believe Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Luda Technology Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 LUDLuda Technology Group0 0 0 -
Is NDGPY or LUD More Risky?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.305, which suggesting that the stock is 69.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luda Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDGPY or LUD?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luda Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luda Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDGPY or LUD?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Luda Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Luda Technology Group's net income of --. Notably, Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.88x while Luda Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. is 0.38x versus -- for Luda Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.0.38x 13.88x -- -- LUDLuda Technology Group-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NDGPY or MOAEF?
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.96% beat Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.-- -- $16.1B MOAEFMongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.-- -- $174.1M -
What do Analysts Say About NDGPY or MOAEF?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 MOAEFMongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NDGPY or MOAEF More Risky?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.305, which suggesting that the stock is 69.47% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.230, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.031%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDGPY or MOAEF?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDGPY or MOAEF?
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.88x while Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd. is 0.38x versus 0.05x for Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDGPYNine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.0.38x 13.88x -- -- MOAEFMongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.0.05x 0.06x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 62.05% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 8.88% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.82% over the past day.
