Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
54
NAUBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.33
Seasonality move
:
0.45%
Day range:
$26.50 - $26.50
52-week range:
$18.84 - $28.65
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
19.47x
P/S ratio:
2.23x
P/B ratio:
1.93x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
5K
1-year change:
15.12%
Market cap:
$81B
Revenue:
$38.8B
EPS (TTM):
$1.36
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NAUBF
National Australia Bank Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HAFG
Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN Ltd.
|
$238.7M | $0.14 | 97.73% | 24.91% | $83.00 |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NAUBF
National Australia Bank Ltd.
|
$26.50 | -- | $81B | 19.47x | $0.55 | 0% | 2.23x |
|
CMSQY
Computershare Ltd.
|
$22.88 | -- | $13.2B | 22.17x | $0.48 | 4.07% | 4.39x |
|
HAFG
Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.
|
$0.55 | -- | $40.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 22.81x |
|
IREN
IREN Ltd.
|
$39.41 | $83.00 | $12.9B | 20.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 15.37x |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group Ltd.
|
$137.61 | -- | $52.4B | 21.66x | $1.85 | 3.2% | 2.47x |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries, Inc.
|
$0.0019 | -- | $935.6K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 14.70x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NAUBF
National Australia Bank Ltd.
|
77.29% | 2.135 | -- | 194.23x |
|
CMSQY
Computershare Ltd.
|
45.73% | -0.374 | -- | 1.44x |
|
HAFG
Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | 3.050 | -- | 0.13x |
|
IREN
IREN Ltd.
|
25.14% | 9.029 | 7.27% | 5.18x |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group Ltd.
|
90.3% | 2.066 | -- | 1.35x |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries, Inc.
|
-- | -13.441 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NAUBF
National Australia Bank Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.64% | 10.89% | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 13.84% | 26.84% | -- | -- |
|
HAFG
Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.
|
$57.6K | -$10.9K | -- | -- | -0.88% | -$44.1K |
|
IREN
IREN Ltd.
|
$74.4M | -$64M | 28.87% | 35.42% | -26.62% | -$138.3M |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.33% | 10.68% | -- | -- |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
National Australia Bank Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NAUBF or CMSQY?
Computershare Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net margin of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat Computershare Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.-- -- $172.4B CMSQYComputershare Ltd.-- -- $3.5B -
What do Analysts Say About NAUBF or CMSQY?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Computershare Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank Ltd. has higher upside potential than Computershare Ltd., analysts believe National Australia Bank Ltd. is more attractive than Computershare Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.0 0 0 CMSQYComputershare Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NAUBF or CMSQY More Risky?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a beta of 0.848, which suggesting that the stock is 15.237% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Computershare Ltd. has a beta of 0.276, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.449%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAUBF or CMSQY?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Computershare Ltd. offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. National Australia Bank Ltd. pays 76.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare Ltd. pays out 90.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAUBF or CMSQY?
National Australia Bank Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Computershare Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Computershare Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.47x while Computershare Ltd.'s PE ratio is 22.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank Ltd. is 2.23x versus 4.39x for Computershare Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.2.23x 19.47x -- -- CMSQYComputershare Ltd.4.39x 22.17x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NAUBF or HAFG?
Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net margin of -1.1%. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.-- -- $172.4B HAFGHolistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.4.66% -$0.00 -$261.3K -
What do Analysts Say About NAUBF or HAFG?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank Ltd. has higher upside potential than Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe National Australia Bank Ltd. is more attractive than Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.0 0 0 HAFGHolistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NAUBF or HAFG More Risky?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a beta of 0.848, which suggesting that the stock is 15.237% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.415%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAUBF or HAFG?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank Ltd. pays 76.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAUBF or HAFG?
National Australia Bank Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.2M. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$13.6K. Notably, National Australia Bank Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.47x while Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank Ltd. is 2.23x versus 22.81x for Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.2.23x 19.47x -- -- HAFGHolistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.22.81x -- $1.2M -$13.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns NAUBF or IREN?
IREN Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net margin of 16.73%. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat IREN Ltd.'s return on equity of 35.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.-- -- $172.4B IRENIREN Ltd.30.96% $1.08 $3.8B -
What do Analysts Say About NAUBF or IREN?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IREN Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could grow by 110.61%. Given that IREN Ltd. has higher upside potential than National Australia Bank Ltd., analysts believe IREN Ltd. is more attractive than National Australia Bank Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.0 0 0 IRENIREN Ltd.9 2 1 -
Is NAUBF or IREN More Risky?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a beta of 0.848, which suggesting that the stock is 15.237% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAUBF or IREN?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IREN Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank Ltd. pays 76.94% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAUBF or IREN?
National Australia Bank Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN Ltd. quarterly revenues of $240.3M. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than IREN Ltd.'s net income of $384.6M. Notably, National Australia Bank Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.47x while IREN Ltd.'s PE ratio is 20.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank Ltd. is 2.23x versus 15.37x for IREN Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.2.23x 19.47x -- -- IRENIREN Ltd.15.37x 20.09x $240.3M $384.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns NAUBF or MQBKY?
Macquarie Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net margin of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat Macquarie Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.-- -- $172.4B MQBKYMacquarie Group Ltd.-- -- $229.3B -
What do Analysts Say About NAUBF or MQBKY?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Macquarie Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank Ltd. has higher upside potential than Macquarie Group Ltd., analysts believe National Australia Bank Ltd. is more attractive than Macquarie Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.0 0 0 MQBKYMacquarie Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NAUBF or MQBKY More Risky?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a beta of 0.848, which suggesting that the stock is 15.237% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macquarie Group Ltd. has a beta of 1.474, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.393%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAUBF or MQBKY?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Macquarie Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share. National Australia Bank Ltd. pays 76.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group Ltd. pays out 62.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAUBF or MQBKY?
National Australia Bank Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Macquarie Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Macquarie Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.47x while Macquarie Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank Ltd. is 2.23x versus 2.47x for Macquarie Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.2.23x 19.47x -- -- MQBKYMacquarie Group Ltd.2.47x 21.66x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NAUBF or SIPN?
SIPP International Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net margin of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat SIPP International Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.-- -- $172.4B SIPNSIPP International Industries, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NAUBF or SIPN?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SIPP International Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank Ltd. has higher upside potential than SIPP International Industries, Inc., analysts believe National Australia Bank Ltd. is more attractive than SIPP International Industries, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.0 0 0 SIPNSIPP International Industries, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is NAUBF or SIPN More Risky?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a beta of 0.848, which suggesting that the stock is 15.237% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIPP International Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.178, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.234%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAUBF or SIPN?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIPP International Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank Ltd. pays 76.94% of its earnings as a dividend. SIPP International Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAUBF or SIPN?
National Australia Bank Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIPP International Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than SIPP International Industries, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.47x while SIPP International Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank Ltd. is 2.23x versus 14.70x for SIPP International Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAUBFNational Australia Bank Ltd.2.23x 19.47x -- -- SIPNSIPP International Industries, Inc.14.70x -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 3.19% over the past day.
