3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Sell
44
NAUBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$23.02
Seasonality move
:
4.92%
Day range:
$23.02 - $23.02
52-week range:
$19.97 - $28.00
Dividend yield:
4.85%
P/E ratio:
15.58x
P/S ratio:
5.54x
P/B ratio:
1.66x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
404
1-year change:
10.73%
Market cap:
$70.7B
Revenue:
$13.6B
EPS (TTM):
$1.48
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NAUBF
National Australia Bank
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$118.1M | $0.04 | 190.35% | -6.46% | $19.11 |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NAUBF
National Australia Bank
|
$23.02 | -- | $70.7B | 15.58x | $0.56 | 4.85% | 5.54x |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
$1.30 | -- | $868.3M | -- | $0.06 | 9.3% | 0.71x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$11.77 | $19.11 | $2.5B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 7.90x |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
$0.26 | -- | $121.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1,369.20x |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
$7.28 | -- | $380M | 5.21x | $0.15 | 3.46% | 2.96x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NAUBF
National Australia Bank
|
77.71% | 0.451 | 177.89% | 11.92x |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
27.58% | 0.109 | 59.97% | 1.31x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
-- | 8.522 | -- | 0.84x |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 11.94x |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
9.65% | 0.239 | 11.84% | 60.33x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NAUBF
National Australia Bank
|
-- | -- | 2.76% | 11.29% | -- | -- |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
-- | -- | -5.94% | -8.25% | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$46.7M | -$39.1M | -9.17% | -10.49% | -92.59% | -- |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | -- | -38.32% | -38.32% | -- | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
-- | -- | 19.33% | 20.17% | -- | -- |
National Australia Bank vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NAUBF or IOOFF?
Insignia Financial has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of --. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 11.29% beat Insignia Financial's return on equity of -8.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAUBFNational Australia Bank-- -- $191.3B IOOFFInsignia Financial-- -- $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About NAUBF or IOOFF?
National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Insignia Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank has higher upside potential than Insignia Financial, analysts believe National Australia Bank is more attractive than Insignia Financial.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAUBFNational Australia Bank0 0 0 IOOFFInsignia Financial0 0 0 -
Is NAUBF or IOOFF More Risky?
National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.066, which suggesting that the stock is 6.633% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Insignia Financial has a beta of 0.363, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.687%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAUBF or IOOFF?
National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. Insignia Financial offers a yield of 9.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Insignia Financial pays out -55.91% of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAUBF or IOOFF?
National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Insignia Financial quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than Insignia Financial's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.58x while Insignia Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 5.54x versus 0.71x for Insignia Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAUBFNational Australia Bank5.54x 15.58x -- -- IOOFFInsignia Financial0.71x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NAUBF or IREN?
IREN has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of -95.07%. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 11.29% beat IREN's return on equity of -10.49%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAUBFNational Australia Bank-- -- $191.3B IRENIREN85.8% -$0.27 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About NAUBF or IREN?
National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $19.11 which suggests that it could grow by 73.79%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than National Australia Bank, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than National Australia Bank.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAUBFNational Australia Bank0 0 0 IRENIREN7 2 0 -
Is NAUBF or IREN More Risky?
National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.066, which suggesting that the stock is 6.633% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAUBF or IREN?
National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAUBF or IREN?
National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $54.4M. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of -$51.7M. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.58x while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 5.54x versus 7.90x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAUBFNational Australia Bank5.54x 15.58x -- -- IRENIREN7.90x -- $54.4M -$51.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns NAUBF or PTMGF?
Platinum Asset Management has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of --. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 11.29% beat Platinum Asset Management's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAUBFNational Australia Bank-- -- $191.3B PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NAUBF or PTMGF?
National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Platinum Asset Management has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank has higher upside potential than Platinum Asset Management, analysts believe National Australia Bank is more attractive than Platinum Asset Management.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAUBFNational Australia Bank0 0 0 PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management0 0 0 -
Is NAUBF or PTMGF More Risky?
National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.066, which suggesting that the stock is 6.633% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Platinum Asset Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAUBF or PTMGF?
National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. Platinum Asset Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Platinum Asset Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAUBF or PTMGF?
National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Platinum Asset Management quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than Platinum Asset Management's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.58x while Platinum Asset Management's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 5.54x versus -- for Platinum Asset Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAUBFNational Australia Bank5.54x 15.58x -- -- PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NAUBF or SORHF?
Strategic Elements has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of --. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 11.29% beat Strategic Elements's return on equity of -38.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAUBFNational Australia Bank-- -- $191.3B SORHFStrategic Elements-- -- $3.6M -
What do Analysts Say About NAUBF or SORHF?
National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strategic Elements has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank has higher upside potential than Strategic Elements, analysts believe National Australia Bank is more attractive than Strategic Elements.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAUBFNational Australia Bank0 0 0 SORHFStrategic Elements0 0 0 -
Is NAUBF or SORHF More Risky?
National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.066, which suggesting that the stock is 6.633% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAUBF or SORHF?
National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. Strategic Elements offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Elements pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAUBF or SORHF?
National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Strategic Elements quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than Strategic Elements's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.58x while Strategic Elements's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 5.54x versus 1,369.20x for Strategic Elements. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAUBFNational Australia Bank5.54x 15.58x -- -- SORHFStrategic Elements1,369.20x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NAUBF or TSRUF?
Pacific Current Group has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of --. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 11.29% beat Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 20.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAUBFNational Australia Bank-- -- $191.3B TSRUFPacific Current Group-- -- $443.2M -
What do Analysts Say About NAUBF or TSRUF?
National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacific Current Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank has higher upside potential than Pacific Current Group, analysts believe National Australia Bank is more attractive than Pacific Current Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAUBFNational Australia Bank0 0 0 TSRUFPacific Current Group0 0 0 -
Is NAUBF or TSRUF More Risky?
National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.066, which suggesting that the stock is 6.633% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAUBF or TSRUF?
National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. Pacific Current Group offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group pays out 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAUBF or TSRUF?
National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than Pacific Current Group's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.58x while Pacific Current Group's PE ratio is 5.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 5.54x versus 2.96x for Pacific Current Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAUBFNational Australia Bank5.54x 15.58x -- -- TSRUFPacific Current Group2.96x 5.21x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will American Tower Stock Recover?
The performance of the real estate investment trust, or REIT,…
Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?
Booking Holdings, the travel and technology company that owns brands…
Stock Ideas
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 125x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
50
NARI alert for Jan 7
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 30.64% over the past day.
Buy
70
PDEX alert for Jan 7
Pro-Dex [PDEX] is up 22.41% over the past day.
Buy
52
ALCO alert for Jan 7
Alico [ALCO] is up 18.99% over the past day.
