Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
55
NABZY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$17.45
Seasonality move
:
2.34%
Day range:
$17.37 - $18.13
52-week range:
$9.32 - $18.13
Dividend yield:
3.15%
P/E ratio:
25.74x
P/S ratio:
2.95x
P/B ratio:
2.03x
Volume:
135.5K
Avg. volume:
150.2K
1-year change:
57.27%
Market cap:
$107B
Revenue:
$38.8B
EPS (TTM):
$0.68
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NABZY
National Australia Bank Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $16.45 |
|
HFAHF
Navigator Global Investments Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NABZY
National Australia Bank Ltd.
|
$17.52 | $16.45 | $107B | 25.74x | $0.28 | 3.15% | 2.95x |
|
HFAHF
Navigator Global Investments Ltd.
|
$1.45 | -- | $709.7M | 17.20x | $0.03 | 0% | 1.66x |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial Ltd.
|
$1.30 | -- | $871.9M | 11.97x | $0.06 | 0% | 0.82x |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group Ltd.
|
$6.40 | -- | $1.1B | 12.31x | $0.17 | 0% | 6.07x |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group Ltd.
|
$6.70 | -- | $200.7M | 17.48x | $0.09 | 0% | 9.25x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NABZY
National Australia Bank Ltd.
|
77.29% | 0.974 | -- | 194.23x |
|
HFAHF
Navigator Global Investments Ltd.
|
-- | 0.710 | -- | -- |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial Ltd.
|
36.66% | 0.000 | -- | 3.13x |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group Ltd.
|
0.63% | 0.000 | -- | 5.22x |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group Ltd.
|
0.08% | 0.235 | -- | 61.84x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NABZY
National Australia Bank Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.64% | 10.89% | -- | -- |
|
HFAHF
Navigator Global Investments Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -2.07% | -3.14% | -- | -- |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 22.27% | 22.91% | -- | -- |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 31.65% | 32.85% | -- | -- |
National Australia Bank Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NABZY or HFAHF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net margin of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.-- -- $172.4B HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NABZY or HFAHF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a consensus price target of $16.45, signalling downside risk potential of -6.11%. On the other hand Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank Ltd. has higher upside potential than Navigator Global Investments Ltd., analysts believe National Australia Bank Ltd. is more attractive than Navigator Global Investments Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.0 1 0 HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NABZY or HFAHF More Risky?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a beta of 1.150, which suggesting that the stock is 15.047% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a beta of 30.922, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2992.183%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NABZY or HFAHF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Navigator Global Investments Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. National Australia Bank Ltd. pays 72.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Navigator Global Investments Ltd. pays out -14.08% of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NABZY or HFAHF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Navigator Global Investments Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.74x while Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank Ltd. is 2.95x versus 1.66x for Navigator Global Investments Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.2.95x 25.74x -- -- HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.1.66x 17.20x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NABZY or IOOFF?
Insignia Financial Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net margin of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat Insignia Financial Ltd.'s return on equity of -3.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.-- -- $172.4B IOOFFInsignia Financial Ltd.-- -- $2B -
What do Analysts Say About NABZY or IOOFF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a consensus price target of $16.45, signalling downside risk potential of -6.11%. On the other hand Insignia Financial Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank Ltd. has higher upside potential than Insignia Financial Ltd., analysts believe National Australia Bank Ltd. is more attractive than Insignia Financial Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.0 1 0 IOOFFInsignia Financial Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NABZY or IOOFF More Risky?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a beta of 1.150, which suggesting that the stock is 15.047% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Insignia Financial Ltd. has a beta of 0.316, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.396%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NABZY or IOOFF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Insignia Financial Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. National Australia Bank Ltd. pays 72.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Insignia Financial Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NABZY or IOOFF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Insignia Financial Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Insignia Financial Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.74x while Insignia Financial Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank Ltd. is 2.95x versus 0.82x for Insignia Financial Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.2.95x 25.74x -- -- IOOFFInsignia Financial Ltd.0.82x 11.97x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NABZY or MGLLF?
Magellan Financial Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net margin of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat Magellan Financial Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.91%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.-- -- $172.4B MGLLFMagellan Financial Group Ltd.-- -- $648.1M -
What do Analysts Say About NABZY or MGLLF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a consensus price target of $16.45, signalling downside risk potential of -6.11%. On the other hand Magellan Financial Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank Ltd. has higher upside potential than Magellan Financial Group Ltd., analysts believe National Australia Bank Ltd. is more attractive than Magellan Financial Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.0 1 0 MGLLFMagellan Financial Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NABZY or MGLLF More Risky?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a beta of 1.150, which suggesting that the stock is 15.047% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magellan Financial Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NABZY or MGLLF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Magellan Financial Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. National Australia Bank Ltd. pays 72.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Magellan Financial Group Ltd. pays out 56.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NABZY or MGLLF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magellan Financial Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Magellan Financial Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.74x while Magellan Financial Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank Ltd. is 2.95x versus 6.07x for Magellan Financial Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.2.95x 25.74x -- -- MGLLFMagellan Financial Group Ltd.6.07x 12.31x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NABZY or PTMGF?
Platinum Asset Management has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net margin of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat Platinum Asset Management's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.-- -- $172.4B PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NABZY or PTMGF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a consensus price target of $16.45, signalling downside risk potential of -6.11%. On the other hand Platinum Asset Management has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank Ltd. has higher upside potential than Platinum Asset Management, analysts believe National Australia Bank Ltd. is more attractive than Platinum Asset Management.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.0 1 0 PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management0 0 0 -
Is NABZY or PTMGF More Risky?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a beta of 1.150, which suggesting that the stock is 15.047% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Platinum Asset Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NABZY or PTMGF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Platinum Asset Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank Ltd. pays 72.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Platinum Asset Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NABZY or PTMGF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Platinum Asset Management quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Platinum Asset Management's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.74x while Platinum Asset Management's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank Ltd. is 2.95x versus -- for Platinum Asset Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.2.95x 25.74x -- -- PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NABZY or TSRUF?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net margin of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.-- -- $172.4B TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.-- -- $449.6M -
What do Analysts Say About NABZY or TSRUF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a consensus price target of $16.45, signalling downside risk potential of -6.11%. On the other hand Pacific Current Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pacific Current Group Ltd., analysts believe National Australia Bank Ltd. is more attractive than Pacific Current Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.0 1 0 TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NABZY or TSRUF More Risky?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a beta of 1.150, which suggesting that the stock is 15.047% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.025, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.534%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NABZY or TSRUF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Pacific Current Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. National Australia Bank Ltd. pays 72.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group Ltd. pays out 34.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NABZY or TSRUF?
National Australia Bank Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacific Current Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.74x while Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank Ltd. is 2.95x versus 9.25x for Pacific Current Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NABZYNational Australia Bank Ltd.2.95x 25.74x -- -- TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.9.25x 17.48x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 14.29% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 10.81% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 6.6% over the past day.
