Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Sell
12
TSRUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.28
Seasonality move
:
5.93%
Day range:
$7.31 - $7.31
52-week range:
$5.70 - $7.48
Dividend yield:
3.45%
P/E ratio:
5.23x
P/S ratio:
2.97x
P/B ratio:
0.95x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
283
1-year change:
28.16%
Market cap:
$381.3M
Revenue:
$130.2M
EPS (TTM):
$1.40
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$54.8M | -$0.07 | 190.35% | -6.46% | $20.45 |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
$7.31 | -- | $381.3M | 5.23x | $0.15 | 3.45% | 2.97x |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
$1.30 | -- | $868.3M | -- | $0.06 | 9.3% | 0.71x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$11.25 | $20.45 | $2.4B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 7.55x |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group
|
$6.42 | -- | $1.2B | 7.43x | $0.24 | 6.74% | 4.11x |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
$0.26 | -- | $121.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1,369.20x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
9.65% | -0.076 | 11.84% | 60.33x |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
27.58% | 0.238 | 59.97% | 1.31x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
-- | 8.875 | -- | 0.84x |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group
|
0.74% | 0.174 | 0.39% | 16.83x |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 11.94x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
-- | -- | 19.33% | 20.17% | -- | -- |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
-- | -- | -5.94% | -8.25% | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$46.7M | -$39.1M | -9.17% | -10.49% | -92.59% | -- |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group
|
-- | -- | 23.29% | 24% | -- | -- |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | -- | -38.32% | -38.32% | -- | -- |
Pacific Current Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or IOOFF?
Insignia Financial has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group's net margin of --. Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 20.17% beat Insignia Financial's return on equity of -8.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group-- -- $443.2M IOOFFInsignia Financial-- -- $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or IOOFF?
Pacific Current Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Insignia Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacific Current Group has higher upside potential than Insignia Financial, analysts believe Pacific Current Group is more attractive than Insignia Financial.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group0 0 0 IOOFFInsignia Financial0 0 0 -
Is TSRUF or IOOFF More Risky?
Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Insignia Financial has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or IOOFF?
Pacific Current Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. Insignia Financial offers a yield of 9.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Pacific Current Group pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Insignia Financial pays out -55.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or IOOFF?
Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Insignia Financial quarterly revenues of --. Pacific Current Group's net income of -- is lower than Insignia Financial's net income of --. Notably, Pacific Current Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.23x while Insignia Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group is 2.97x versus 0.71x for Insignia Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group2.97x 5.23x -- -- IOOFFInsignia Financial0.71x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or IREN?
IREN has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group's net margin of -95.07%. Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 20.17% beat IREN's return on equity of -10.49%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group-- -- $443.2M IRENIREN85.8% -$0.27 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or IREN?
Pacific Current Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $20.45 which suggests that it could grow by 81.82%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Pacific Current Group, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Pacific Current Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group0 0 0 IRENIREN8 2 0 -
Is TSRUF or IREN More Risky?
Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or IREN?
Pacific Current Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacific Current Group pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or IREN?
Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $54.4M. Pacific Current Group's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of -$51.7M. Notably, Pacific Current Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.23x while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group is 2.97x versus 7.55x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group2.97x 5.23x -- -- IRENIREN7.55x -- $54.4M -$51.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or MGLLF?
Magellan Financial Group has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group's net margin of --. Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 20.17% beat Magellan Financial Group's return on equity of 24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group-- -- $443.2M MGLLFMagellan Financial Group-- -- $686.5M -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or MGLLF?
Pacific Current Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magellan Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacific Current Group has higher upside potential than Magellan Financial Group, analysts believe Pacific Current Group is more attractive than Magellan Financial Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group0 0 0 MGLLFMagellan Financial Group0 0 0 -
Is TSRUF or MGLLF More Risky?
Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magellan Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or MGLLF?
Pacific Current Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. Magellan Financial Group offers a yield of 6.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Pacific Current Group pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Magellan Financial Group pays out 74.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or MGLLF?
Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magellan Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Pacific Current Group's net income of -- is lower than Magellan Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Pacific Current Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.23x while Magellan Financial Group's PE ratio is 7.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group is 2.97x versus 4.11x for Magellan Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group2.97x 5.23x -- -- MGLLFMagellan Financial Group4.11x 7.43x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or PTMGF?
Platinum Asset Management has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group's net margin of --. Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 20.17% beat Platinum Asset Management's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group-- -- $443.2M PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or PTMGF?
Pacific Current Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Platinum Asset Management has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacific Current Group has higher upside potential than Platinum Asset Management, analysts believe Pacific Current Group is more attractive than Platinum Asset Management.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group0 0 0 PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management0 0 0 -
Is TSRUF or PTMGF More Risky?
Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Platinum Asset Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or PTMGF?
Pacific Current Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. Platinum Asset Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacific Current Group pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Platinum Asset Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or PTMGF?
Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Platinum Asset Management quarterly revenues of --. Pacific Current Group's net income of -- is lower than Platinum Asset Management's net income of --. Notably, Pacific Current Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.23x while Platinum Asset Management's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group is 2.97x versus -- for Platinum Asset Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group2.97x 5.23x -- -- PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or SORHF?
Strategic Elements has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group's net margin of --. Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 20.17% beat Strategic Elements's return on equity of -38.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group-- -- $443.2M SORHFStrategic Elements-- -- $3.6M -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or SORHF?
Pacific Current Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strategic Elements has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacific Current Group has higher upside potential than Strategic Elements, analysts believe Pacific Current Group is more attractive than Strategic Elements.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group0 0 0 SORHFStrategic Elements0 0 0 -
Is TSRUF or SORHF More Risky?
Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or SORHF?
Pacific Current Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. Strategic Elements offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacific Current Group pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Elements pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or SORHF?
Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Strategic Elements quarterly revenues of --. Pacific Current Group's net income of -- is lower than Strategic Elements's net income of --. Notably, Pacific Current Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.23x while Strategic Elements's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group is 2.97x versus 1,369.20x for Strategic Elements. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group2.97x 5.23x -- -- SORHFStrategic Elements1,369.20x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
52
TSLL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
73
PSIX alert for Dec 24
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Sell
31
SOXL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares [SOXL] is up 11.87% over the past day.
