Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
8
TSRUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.70
Seasonality move
:
8.11%
Day range:
$6.70 - $6.70
52-week range:
$6.70 - $7.73
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
17.48x
P/S ratio:
3.06x
P/B ratio:
0.47x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
5
1-year change:
-7.97%
Market cap:
$202M
Revenue:
$88.9M
EPS (TTM):
$0.84
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HAFG
Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN Ltd.
|
$229.6M | -$0.24 | 97.73% | 24.91% | $83.00 |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group Ltd.
|
$6.70 | -- | $202M | 17.48x | $0.09 | 0% | 3.06x |
|
CMSQY
Computershare Ltd.
|
$22.96 | -- | $13.3B | 22.22x | $0.48 | 4.05% | 4.41x |
|
HAFG
Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.
|
$0.55 | -- | $40.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 22.81x |
|
IREN
IREN Ltd.
|
$48.24 | $83.00 | $15.8B | 24.60x | $0.00 | 0% | 18.81x |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group Ltd.
|
$137.72 | -- | $52.5B | 21.68x | $1.85 | 3.2% | 2.47x |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries, Inc.
|
$0.0019 | -- | $935.6K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 14.70x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group Ltd.
|
0.08% | 0.238 | -- | 61.84x |
|
CMSQY
Computershare Ltd.
|
45.73% | -0.378 | -- | 1.44x |
|
HAFG
Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | 3.318 | -- | 0.13x |
|
IREN
IREN Ltd.
|
25.14% | 8.966 | 7.27% | 5.18x |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group Ltd.
|
90.3% | 1.907 | -- | 1.35x |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries, Inc.
|
-- | -15.647 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 31.65% | 32.85% | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 13.84% | 26.84% | -- | -- |
|
HAFG
Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.
|
$57.6K | -$10.9K | -- | -- | -0.88% | -$44.1K |
|
IREN
IREN Ltd.
|
$74.4M | -$64M | 28.87% | 35.42% | -26.62% | -$138.3M |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.33% | 10.68% | -- | -- |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Pacific Current Group Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or CMSQY?
Computershare Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.85% beat Computershare Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.-- -- $449.6M CMSQYComputershare Ltd.-- -- $3.5B -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or CMSQY?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Computershare Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacific Current Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Computershare Ltd., analysts believe Pacific Current Group Ltd. is more attractive than Computershare Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.0 0 0 CMSQYComputershare Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TSRUF or CMSQY More Risky?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.026, which suggesting that the stock is 97.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Computershare Ltd. has a beta of 0.268, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.151%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or CMSQY?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Computershare Ltd. offers a yield of 4.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Pacific Current Group Ltd. pays 34.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare Ltd. pays out 90.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or CMSQY?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Computershare Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Computershare Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.48x while Computershare Ltd.'s PE ratio is 22.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group Ltd. is 3.06x versus 4.41x for Computershare Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.3.06x 17.48x -- -- CMSQYComputershare Ltd.4.41x 22.22x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or HAFG?
Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s net margin of -1.1%. Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.85% beat Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.-- -- $449.6M HAFGHolistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.4.66% -$0.00 -$261.3K -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or HAFG?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacific Current Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe Pacific Current Group Ltd. is more attractive than Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.0 0 0 HAFGHolistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TSRUF or HAFG More Risky?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.026, which suggesting that the stock is 97.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.014%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or HAFG?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacific Current Group Ltd. pays 34.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or HAFG?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$13.6K. Notably, Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.48x while Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group Ltd. is 3.06x versus 22.81x for Holistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.3.06x 17.48x -- -- HAFGHolistic Asset Finance Group Co., Ltd.22.81x -- $1.2M -$13.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or IREN?
IREN Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s net margin of 16.73%. Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.85% beat IREN Ltd.'s return on equity of 35.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.-- -- $449.6M IRENIREN Ltd.30.96% $1.08 $3.8B -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or IREN?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IREN Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could grow by 72.06%. Given that IREN Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pacific Current Group Ltd., analysts believe IREN Ltd. is more attractive than Pacific Current Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.0 0 0 IRENIREN Ltd.9 2 1 -
Is TSRUF or IREN More Risky?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.026, which suggesting that the stock is 97.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or IREN?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IREN Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacific Current Group Ltd. pays 34.53% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or IREN?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN Ltd. quarterly revenues of $240.3M. Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than IREN Ltd.'s net income of $384.6M. Notably, Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.48x while IREN Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group Ltd. is 3.06x versus 18.81x for IREN Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.3.06x 17.48x -- -- IRENIREN Ltd.18.81x 24.60x $240.3M $384.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or MQBKY?
Macquarie Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.85% beat Macquarie Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.-- -- $449.6M MQBKYMacquarie Group Ltd.-- -- $229.3B -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or MQBKY?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Macquarie Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacific Current Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Macquarie Group Ltd., analysts believe Pacific Current Group Ltd. is more attractive than Macquarie Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.0 0 0 MQBKYMacquarie Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TSRUF or MQBKY More Risky?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.026, which suggesting that the stock is 97.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macquarie Group Ltd. has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.765%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or MQBKY?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Macquarie Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share. Pacific Current Group Ltd. pays 34.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group Ltd. pays out 62.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or MQBKY?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Macquarie Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Macquarie Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.48x while Macquarie Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group Ltd. is 3.06x versus 2.47x for Macquarie Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.3.06x 17.48x -- -- MQBKYMacquarie Group Ltd.2.47x 21.68x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or SIPN?
SIPP International Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.85% beat SIPP International Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.-- -- $449.6M SIPNSIPP International Industries, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or SIPN?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SIPP International Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacific Current Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than SIPP International Industries, Inc., analysts believe Pacific Current Group Ltd. is more attractive than SIPP International Industries, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.0 0 0 SIPNSIPP International Industries, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is TSRUF or SIPN More Risky?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.026, which suggesting that the stock is 97.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIPP International Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.168%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or SIPN?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIPP International Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacific Current Group Ltd. pays 34.53% of its earnings as a dividend. SIPP International Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or SIPN?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIPP International Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than SIPP International Industries, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.48x while SIPP International Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group Ltd. is 3.06x versus 14.70x for SIPP International Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.3.06x 17.48x -- -- SIPNSIPP International Industries, Inc.14.70x -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
64
RGC alert for Jan 6
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 22.74% over the past day.
Buy
73
INOD alert for Jan 6
Innodata, Inc. [INOD] is up 4.84% over the past day.
Buy
65
AVAV alert for Jan 6
AeroVironment, Inc. [AVAV] is up 6.62% over the past day.
