Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
85
HFAHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.45
Seasonality move
:
993.87%
Day range:
$1.45 - $1.45
52-week range:
$1.08 - $1.45
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
17.20x
P/S ratio:
1.66x
P/B ratio:
0.63x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
23.5%
Market cap:
$709.7M
Revenue:
$445.9M
EPS (TTM):
$0.08
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HFAHF
Navigator Global Investments Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PPTTF
Perpetual Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HFAHF
Navigator Global Investments Ltd.
|
$1.45 | -- | $709.7M | 17.20x | $0.03 | 0% | 1.66x |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial Ltd.
|
$1.30 | -- | $871.9M | 11.97x | $0.06 | 0% | 0.82x |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group Ltd.
|
$6.40 | -- | $1.1B | 12.31x | $0.17 | 0% | 6.07x |
|
PPTTF
Perpetual Ltd.
|
$12.60 | -- | $1.4B | -- | $0.39 | 0% | 1.61x |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group Ltd.
|
$6.70 | -- | $200.7M | 17.48x | $0.09 | 0% | 9.25x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HFAHF
Navigator Global Investments Ltd.
|
-- | 0.710 | -- | -- |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial Ltd.
|
36.66% | 0.000 | -- | 3.13x |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group Ltd.
|
0.63% | 0.000 | -- | 5.22x |
|
PPTTF
Perpetual Ltd.
|
35.65% | -0.222 | -- | 0.47x |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group Ltd.
|
0.08% | 0.235 | -- | 61.84x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HFAHF
Navigator Global Investments Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -2.07% | -3.14% | -- | -- |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 22.27% | 22.91% | -- | -- |
|
PPTTF
Perpetual Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -17.52% | -25.67% | -- | -- |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 31.65% | 32.85% | -- | -- |
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HFAHF or IOOFF?
Insignia Financial Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s net margin of --. Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Insignia Financial Ltd.'s return on equity of -3.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.-- -- -- IOOFFInsignia Financial Ltd.-- -- $2B -
What do Analysts Say About HFAHF or IOOFF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Insignia Financial Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has higher upside potential than Insignia Financial Ltd., analysts believe Navigator Global Investments Ltd. is more attractive than Insignia Financial Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.0 0 0 IOOFFInsignia Financial Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HFAHF or IOOFF More Risky?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a beta of 30.922, which suggesting that the stock is 2992.183% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Insignia Financial Ltd. has a beta of 0.316, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.396%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HFAHF or IOOFF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Insignia Financial Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Navigator Global Investments Ltd. pays -14.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Insignia Financial Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HFAHF or IOOFF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Insignia Financial Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Insignia Financial Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.20x while Insignia Financial Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navigator Global Investments Ltd. is 1.66x versus 0.82x for Insignia Financial Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.1.66x 17.20x -- -- IOOFFInsignia Financial Ltd.0.82x 11.97x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HFAHF or MGLLF?
Magellan Financial Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s net margin of --. Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Magellan Financial Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.91%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.-- -- -- MGLLFMagellan Financial Group Ltd.-- -- $648.1M -
What do Analysts Say About HFAHF or MGLLF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magellan Financial Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has higher upside potential than Magellan Financial Group Ltd., analysts believe Navigator Global Investments Ltd. is more attractive than Magellan Financial Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.0 0 0 MGLLFMagellan Financial Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HFAHF or MGLLF More Risky?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a beta of 30.922, which suggesting that the stock is 2992.183% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magellan Financial Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HFAHF or MGLLF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magellan Financial Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Navigator Global Investments Ltd. pays -14.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Magellan Financial Group Ltd. pays out 56.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Magellan Financial Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HFAHF or MGLLF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magellan Financial Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Magellan Financial Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.20x while Magellan Financial Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navigator Global Investments Ltd. is 1.66x versus 6.07x for Magellan Financial Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.1.66x 17.20x -- -- MGLLFMagellan Financial Group Ltd.6.07x 12.31x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HFAHF or PPTTF?
Perpetual Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s net margin of --. Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Perpetual Ltd.'s return on equity of -25.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.-- -- -- PPTTFPerpetual Ltd.-- -- $1.7B -
What do Analysts Say About HFAHF or PPTTF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Perpetual Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has higher upside potential than Perpetual Ltd., analysts believe Navigator Global Investments Ltd. is more attractive than Perpetual Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.0 0 0 PPTTFPerpetual Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HFAHF or PPTTF More Risky?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a beta of 30.922, which suggesting that the stock is 2992.183% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perpetual Ltd. has a beta of 0.152, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.824%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HFAHF or PPTTF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perpetual Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Navigator Global Investments Ltd. pays -14.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Perpetual Ltd. pays out 217.7% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HFAHF or PPTTF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Perpetual Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Perpetual Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.20x while Perpetual Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navigator Global Investments Ltd. is 1.66x versus 1.61x for Perpetual Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.1.66x 17.20x -- -- PPTTFPerpetual Ltd.1.61x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HFAHF or PTMGF?
Platinum Asset Management has a net margin of -- compared to Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s net margin of --. Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Platinum Asset Management's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.-- -- -- PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HFAHF or PTMGF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Platinum Asset Management has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has higher upside potential than Platinum Asset Management, analysts believe Navigator Global Investments Ltd. is more attractive than Platinum Asset Management.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.0 0 0 PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management0 0 0 -
Is HFAHF or PTMGF More Risky?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a beta of 30.922, which suggesting that the stock is 2992.183% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Platinum Asset Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HFAHF or PTMGF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Platinum Asset Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Navigator Global Investments Ltd. pays -14.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Platinum Asset Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HFAHF or PTMGF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Platinum Asset Management quarterly revenues of --. Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Platinum Asset Management's net income of --. Notably, Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.20x while Platinum Asset Management's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navigator Global Investments Ltd. is 1.66x versus -- for Platinum Asset Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.1.66x 17.20x -- -- PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HFAHF or TSRUF?
Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s net margin of --. Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.-- -- -- TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.-- -- $449.6M -
What do Analysts Say About HFAHF or TSRUF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacific Current Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pacific Current Group Ltd., analysts believe Navigator Global Investments Ltd. is more attractive than Pacific Current Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.0 0 0 TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HFAHF or TSRUF More Risky?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a beta of 30.922, which suggesting that the stock is 2992.183% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Current Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.025, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.534%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HFAHF or TSRUF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacific Current Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Navigator Global Investments Ltd. pays -14.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group Ltd. pays out 34.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HFAHF or TSRUF?
Navigator Global Investments Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacific Current Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Navigator Global Investments Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.20x while Pacific Current Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navigator Global Investments Ltd. is 1.66x versus 9.25x for Pacific Current Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HFAHFNavigator Global Investments Ltd.1.66x 17.20x -- -- TSRUFPacific Current Group Ltd.9.25x 17.48x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 15.34% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 7.22% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 5.48% over the past day.
