MWTCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aboitiz Power has a net margin of 34.68% compared to Manila Water's net margin of 21.1%. Manila Water's return on equity of 11.29% beat Aboitiz Power's return on equity of 17.21%.

Manila Water has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aboitiz Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Water has higher upside potential than Aboitiz Power, analysts believe Manila Water is more attractive than Aboitiz Power.

Manila Water has a beta of 0.189, which suggesting that the stock is 81.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aboitiz Power has a beta of 0.150, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.967%.

Manila Water has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.27%. Aboitiz Power offers a yield of 6.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Manila Water pays 37.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Aboitiz Power pays out 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Water quarterly revenues are $160.6M, which are smaller than Aboitiz Power quarterly revenues of $840M. Manila Water's net income of $55.7M is lower than Aboitiz Power's net income of $177.3M. Notably, Manila Water's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.39x while Aboitiz Power's PE ratio is 7.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Water is 1.95x versus 1.32x for Aboitiz Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ACEN has a net margin of 34.68% compared to Manila Water's net margin of 21.21%. Manila Water's return on equity of 11.29% beat ACEN's return on equity of 5.41%.

Manila Water has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ACEN has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Water has higher upside potential than ACEN, analysts believe Manila Water is more attractive than ACEN.

Manila Water has a beta of 0.189, which suggesting that the stock is 81.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ACEN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Manila Water has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.27%. ACEN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manila Water pays 37.06% of its earnings as a dividend. ACEN pays out 53.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Water quarterly revenues are $160.6M, which are larger than ACEN quarterly revenues of $152.5M. Manila Water's net income of $55.7M is higher than ACEN's net income of $32.3M. Notably, Manila Water's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.39x while ACEN's PE ratio is 22.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Water is 1.95x versus 4.54x for ACEN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Gen has a net margin of 34.68% compared to Manila Water's net margin of 9.31%. Manila Water's return on equity of 11.29% beat First Gen's return on equity of 8.17%.

Manila Water has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Gen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Water has higher upside potential than First Gen, analysts believe Manila Water is more attractive than First Gen.

Manila Water has a beta of 0.189, which suggesting that the stock is 81.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Gen has a beta of 0.538, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.164%.

Manila Water has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.27%. First Gen offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Manila Water pays 37.06% of its earnings as a dividend. First Gen pays out 27.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Water quarterly revenues are $160.6M, which are smaller than First Gen quarterly revenues of $568.5M. Manila Water's net income of $55.7M is higher than First Gen's net income of $52.9M. Notably, Manila Water's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.39x while First Gen's PE ratio is 4.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Water is 1.95x versus 0.50x for First Gen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manila Electric has a net margin of 34.68% compared to Manila Water's net margin of 9.59%. Manila Water's return on equity of 11.29% beat Manila Electric's return on equity of 26.31%.

Manila Water has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Manila Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Water has higher upside potential than Manila Electric, analysts believe Manila Water is more attractive than Manila Electric.

Manila Water has a beta of 0.189, which suggesting that the stock is 81.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manila Electric has a beta of 0.124, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.61%.

Manila Water has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.27%. Manila Electric offers a yield of 4.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Manila Water pays 37.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Manila Electric pays out 57.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Water quarterly revenues are $160.6M, which are smaller than Manila Electric quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Manila Water's net income of $55.7M is lower than Manila Electric's net income of $197.7M. Notably, Manila Water's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.39x while Manila Electric's PE ratio is 11.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Water is 1.95x versus 1.06x for Manila Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.