MWTCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aboitiz Power Corp. has a net margin of 48.69% compared to Manila Water Co., Inc.'s net margin of 21.72%. Manila Water Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 16.01% beat Aboitiz Power Corp.'s return on equity of 15.83%.

Manila Water Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aboitiz Power Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Water Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Aboitiz Power Corp., analysts believe Manila Water Co., Inc. is more attractive than Aboitiz Power Corp..

Manila Water Co., Inc. has a beta of -0.505, which suggesting that the stock is 150.502% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aboitiz Power Corp. has a beta of 0.378, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.236%.

Manila Water Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Aboitiz Power Corp. offers a yield of 5.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Manila Water Co., Inc. pays 47.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Aboitiz Power Corp. pays out 49.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Water Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $175.1M, which are smaller than Aboitiz Power Corp. quarterly revenues of $919.9M. Manila Water Co., Inc.'s net income of $85.3M is lower than Aboitiz Power Corp.'s net income of $199.8M. Notably, Manila Water Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.99x while Aboitiz Power Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Water Co., Inc. is 2.57x versus 1.71x for Aboitiz Power Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ACEN Corp. has a net margin of 48.69% compared to Manila Water Co., Inc.'s net margin of 16.76%. Manila Water Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 16.01% beat ACEN Corp.'s return on equity of 2.11%.

Manila Water Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ACEN Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Water Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than ACEN Corp., analysts believe Manila Water Co., Inc. is more attractive than ACEN Corp..

Manila Water Co., Inc. has a beta of -0.505, which suggesting that the stock is 150.502% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ACEN Corp. has a beta of -2.133, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 313.295%.

Manila Water Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. ACEN Corp. offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manila Water Co., Inc. pays 47.06% of its earnings as a dividend. ACEN Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manila Water Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Water Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $175.1M, which are larger than ACEN Corp. quarterly revenues of $123.4M. Manila Water Co., Inc.'s net income of $85.3M is higher than ACEN Corp.'s net income of $20.7M. Notably, Manila Water Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.99x while ACEN Corp.'s PE ratio is 100.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Water Co., Inc. is 2.57x versus 2.95x for ACEN Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Gen Corp. has a net margin of 48.69% compared to Manila Water Co., Inc.'s net margin of 9.83%. Manila Water Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 16.01% beat First Gen Corp.'s return on equity of 9.36%.

Manila Water Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Gen Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Water Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than First Gen Corp., analysts believe Manila Water Co., Inc. is more attractive than First Gen Corp..

Manila Water Co., Inc. has a beta of -0.505, which suggesting that the stock is 150.502% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Gen Corp. has a beta of 0.182, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.787%.

Manila Water Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. First Gen Corp. offers a yield of 6.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Manila Water Co., Inc. pays 47.06% of its earnings as a dividend. First Gen Corp. pays out 10.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Water Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $175.1M, which are smaller than First Gen Corp. quarterly revenues of $565.4M. Manila Water Co., Inc.'s net income of $85.3M is higher than First Gen Corp.'s net income of $55.6M. Notably, Manila Water Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.99x while First Gen Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Water Co., Inc. is 2.57x versus 0.33x for First Gen Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manila Electric Co. has a net margin of 48.69% compared to Manila Water Co., Inc.'s net margin of 10.77%. Manila Water Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 16.01% beat Manila Electric Co.'s return on equity of 25.6%.

Manila Water Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Manila Electric Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Water Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Manila Electric Co., analysts believe Manila Water Co., Inc. is more attractive than Manila Electric Co..

Manila Water Co., Inc. has a beta of -0.505, which suggesting that the stock is 150.502% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manila Electric Co. has a beta of -0.262, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.242%.

Manila Water Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Manila Electric Co. offers a yield of 4.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Manila Water Co., Inc. pays 47.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Manila Electric Co. pays out 59.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Water Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $175.1M, which are smaller than Manila Electric Co. quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Manila Water Co., Inc.'s net income of $85.3M is lower than Manila Electric Co.'s net income of $238.6M. Notably, Manila Water Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.99x while Manila Electric Co.'s PE ratio is 12.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Water Co., Inc. is 2.57x versus 1.30x for Manila Electric Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.