ACPIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aboitiz Power has a net margin of 21.21% compared to ACEN's net margin of 21.1%. ACEN's return on equity of 5.41% beat Aboitiz Power's return on equity of 17.21%.

ACEN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aboitiz Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ACEN has higher upside potential than Aboitiz Power, analysts believe ACEN is more attractive than Aboitiz Power.

ACEN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aboitiz Power has a beta of 0.150, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.967%.

ACEN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aboitiz Power offers a yield of 6.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. ACEN pays 53.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Aboitiz Power pays out 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ACEN quarterly revenues are $152.5M, which are smaller than Aboitiz Power quarterly revenues of $840M. ACEN's net income of $32.3M is lower than Aboitiz Power's net income of $177.3M. Notably, ACEN's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.82x while Aboitiz Power's PE ratio is 7.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACEN is 4.54x versus 1.32x for Aboitiz Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Gen has a net margin of 21.21% compared to ACEN's net margin of 9.31%. ACEN's return on equity of 5.41% beat First Gen's return on equity of 8.17%.

ACEN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Gen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ACEN has higher upside potential than First Gen, analysts believe ACEN is more attractive than First Gen.

ACEN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Gen has a beta of 0.538, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.164%.

ACEN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Gen offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. ACEN pays 53.43% of its earnings as a dividend. First Gen pays out 27.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ACEN quarterly revenues are $152.5M, which are smaller than First Gen quarterly revenues of $568.5M. ACEN's net income of $32.3M is lower than First Gen's net income of $52.9M. Notably, ACEN's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.82x while First Gen's PE ratio is 4.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACEN is 4.54x versus 0.50x for First Gen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manila Electric has a net margin of 21.21% compared to ACEN's net margin of 9.59%. ACEN's return on equity of 5.41% beat Manila Electric's return on equity of 26.31%.

ACEN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Manila Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ACEN has higher upside potential than Manila Electric, analysts believe ACEN is more attractive than Manila Electric.

ACEN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manila Electric has a beta of 0.124, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.61%.

ACEN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Manila Electric offers a yield of 4.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. ACEN pays 53.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Manila Electric pays out 57.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ACEN quarterly revenues are $152.5M, which are smaller than Manila Electric quarterly revenues of $2.1B. ACEN's net income of $32.3M is lower than Manila Electric's net income of $197.7M. Notably, ACEN's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.82x while Manila Electric's PE ratio is 11.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACEN is 4.54x versus 1.06x for Manila Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manila Water has a net margin of 21.21% compared to ACEN's net margin of 34.68%. ACEN's return on equity of 5.41% beat Manila Water's return on equity of 11.29%.

ACEN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Manila Water has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ACEN has higher upside potential than Manila Water, analysts believe ACEN is more attractive than Manila Water.

ACEN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manila Water has a beta of 0.189, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.094%.

ACEN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Manila Water offers a yield of 7.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. ACEN pays 53.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Manila Water pays out 37.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ACEN quarterly revenues are $152.5M, which are smaller than Manila Water quarterly revenues of $160.6M. ACEN's net income of $32.3M is lower than Manila Water's net income of $55.7M. Notably, ACEN's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.82x while Manila Water's PE ratio is 8.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACEN is 4.54x versus 1.95x for Manila Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.