MERVF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aboitiz Power Corp. has a net margin of 10.77% compared to Manila Electric Co.'s net margin of 21.72%. Manila Electric Co.'s return on equity of 25.6% beat Aboitiz Power Corp.'s return on equity of 15.83%.

Manila Electric Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aboitiz Power Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Electric Co. has higher upside potential than Aboitiz Power Corp., analysts believe Manila Electric Co. is more attractive than Aboitiz Power Corp..

Manila Electric Co. has a beta of -0.262, which suggesting that the stock is 126.242% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aboitiz Power Corp. has a beta of 0.378, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.236%.

Manila Electric Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.44%. Aboitiz Power Corp. offers a yield of 5.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Manila Electric Co. pays 59.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Aboitiz Power Corp. pays out 49.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Electric Co. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Aboitiz Power Corp. quarterly revenues of $919.9M. Manila Electric Co.'s net income of $238.6M is higher than Aboitiz Power Corp.'s net income of $199.8M. Notably, Manila Electric Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while Aboitiz Power Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Electric Co. is 1.30x versus 1.71x for Aboitiz Power Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ACEN Corp. has a net margin of 10.77% compared to Manila Electric Co.'s net margin of 16.76%. Manila Electric Co.'s return on equity of 25.6% beat ACEN Corp.'s return on equity of 2.11%.

Manila Electric Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ACEN Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Electric Co. has higher upside potential than ACEN Corp., analysts believe Manila Electric Co. is more attractive than ACEN Corp..

Manila Electric Co. has a beta of -0.262, which suggesting that the stock is 126.242% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ACEN Corp. has a beta of -2.133, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 313.295%.

Manila Electric Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.44%. ACEN Corp. offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manila Electric Co. pays 59.06% of its earnings as a dividend. ACEN Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manila Electric Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Electric Co. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than ACEN Corp. quarterly revenues of $123.4M. Manila Electric Co.'s net income of $238.6M is higher than ACEN Corp.'s net income of $20.7M. Notably, Manila Electric Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while ACEN Corp.'s PE ratio is 100.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Electric Co. is 1.30x versus 2.95x for ACEN Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Gen Corp. has a net margin of 10.77% compared to Manila Electric Co.'s net margin of 9.83%. Manila Electric Co.'s return on equity of 25.6% beat First Gen Corp.'s return on equity of 9.36%.

Manila Electric Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Gen Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Electric Co. has higher upside potential than First Gen Corp., analysts believe Manila Electric Co. is more attractive than First Gen Corp..

Manila Electric Co. has a beta of -0.262, which suggesting that the stock is 126.242% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Gen Corp. has a beta of 0.182, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.787%.

Manila Electric Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.44%. First Gen Corp. offers a yield of 6.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Manila Electric Co. pays 59.06% of its earnings as a dividend. First Gen Corp. pays out 10.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Electric Co. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than First Gen Corp. quarterly revenues of $565.4M. Manila Electric Co.'s net income of $238.6M is higher than First Gen Corp.'s net income of $55.6M. Notably, Manila Electric Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while First Gen Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Electric Co. is 1.30x versus 0.33x for First Gen Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manila Water Co., Inc. has a net margin of 10.77% compared to Manila Electric Co.'s net margin of 48.69%. Manila Electric Co.'s return on equity of 25.6% beat Manila Water Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 16.01%.

Manila Electric Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Manila Water Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Electric Co. has higher upside potential than Manila Water Co., Inc., analysts believe Manila Electric Co. is more attractive than Manila Water Co., Inc..

Manila Electric Co. has a beta of -0.262, which suggesting that the stock is 126.242% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manila Water Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.169%.

Manila Electric Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.44%. Manila Water Co., Inc. offers a yield of 4.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Manila Electric Co. pays 59.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Manila Water Co., Inc. pays out 34.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Electric Co. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Manila Water Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $175.1M. Manila Electric Co.'s net income of $238.6M is higher than Manila Water Co., Inc.'s net income of $85.3M. Notably, Manila Electric Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while Manila Water Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Electric Co. is 1.30x versus 2.55x for Manila Water Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.