MERVF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aboitiz Power has a net margin of 9.59% compared to Manila Electric's net margin of 21.1%. Manila Electric's return on equity of 26.31% beat Aboitiz Power's return on equity of 17.21%.

Manila Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aboitiz Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Electric has higher upside potential than Aboitiz Power, analysts believe Manila Electric is more attractive than Aboitiz Power.

Manila Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aboitiz Power has a beta of 0.151, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.921%.

Manila Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. Aboitiz Power offers a yield of 6.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Manila Electric pays 57.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Aboitiz Power pays out 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Electric quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Aboitiz Power quarterly revenues of $840M. Manila Electric's net income of $197.7M is higher than Aboitiz Power's net income of $177.3M. Notably, Manila Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.31x while Aboitiz Power's PE ratio is 7.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Electric is 1.15x versus 1.32x for Aboitiz Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ACEN has a net margin of 9.59% compared to Manila Electric's net margin of 21.21%. Manila Electric's return on equity of 26.31% beat ACEN's return on equity of 5.41%.

Manila Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ACEN has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Electric has higher upside potential than ACEN, analysts believe Manila Electric is more attractive than ACEN.

Manila Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ACEN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Manila Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. ACEN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manila Electric pays 57.05% of its earnings as a dividend. ACEN pays out 53.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Electric quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than ACEN quarterly revenues of $152.5M. Manila Electric's net income of $197.7M is higher than ACEN's net income of $32.3M. Notably, Manila Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.31x while ACEN's PE ratio is 22.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Electric is 1.15x versus 4.54x for ACEN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Gen has a net margin of 9.59% compared to Manila Electric's net margin of 9.31%. Manila Electric's return on equity of 26.31% beat First Gen's return on equity of 8.17%.

Manila Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Gen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Electric has higher upside potential than First Gen, analysts believe Manila Electric is more attractive than First Gen.

Manila Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Gen has a beta of 0.534, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.559%.

Manila Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. First Gen offers a yield of 4.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Manila Electric pays 57.05% of its earnings as a dividend. First Gen pays out 27.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Electric quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than First Gen quarterly revenues of $568.5M. Manila Electric's net income of $197.7M is higher than First Gen's net income of $52.9M. Notably, Manila Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.31x while First Gen's PE ratio is 4.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Electric is 1.15x versus 0.50x for First Gen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manila Water has a net margin of 9.59% compared to Manila Electric's net margin of 34.68%. Manila Electric's return on equity of 26.31% beat Manila Water's return on equity of 11.29%.

Manila Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Manila Water has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manila Electric has higher upside potential than Manila Water, analysts believe Manila Electric is more attractive than Manila Water.

Manila Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manila Water has a beta of 0.192, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.846%.

Manila Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. Manila Water offers a yield of 7.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Manila Electric pays 57.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Manila Water pays out 37.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manila Electric quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Manila Water quarterly revenues of $160.6M. Manila Electric's net income of $197.7M is higher than Manila Water's net income of $55.7M. Notably, Manila Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.31x while Manila Water's PE ratio is 8.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manila Electric is 1.15x versus 1.95x for Manila Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.