LUVU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -2.24% compared to Luvu Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 1.72%. Luvu Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.27% beat Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.67%.

Luvu Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 29.63%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Luvu Brands, Inc., analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Luvu Brands, Inc..

Luvu Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.552, which suggesting that the stock is 55.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.211%.

Luvu Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 4.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Luvu Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. pays out 113.99% of its earnings as a dividend.

Luvu Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $88.7M. Luvu Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$131K is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s net income of $1.5M. Notably, Luvu Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luvu Brands, Inc. is 0.10x versus 0.42x for Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. has a net margin of -2.24% compared to Luvu Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 7.83%. Luvu Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.27% beat Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.21%.

Luvu Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.94%. Given that Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. has higher upside potential than Luvu Brands, Inc., analysts believe Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. is more attractive than Luvu Brands, Inc..

Luvu Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.552, which suggesting that the stock is 55.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. has a beta of 1.203, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.344%.

Luvu Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. offers a yield of 6.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Luvu Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. pays out 77.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luvu Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $149.9M. Luvu Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$131K is lower than Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc.'s net income of $11.7M. Notably, Luvu Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luvu Brands, Inc. is 0.10x versus 1.00x for Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -2.24% compared to Luvu Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 5.62%. Luvu Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.27% beat Flexsteel Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.48%.

Luvu Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $54.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.72%. Given that Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Luvu Brands, Inc., analysts believe Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Luvu Brands, Inc..

Luvu Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.552, which suggesting that the stock is 55.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.508, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.218%.

Luvu Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Luvu Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. pays out 20% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luvu Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than Flexsteel Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $118.2M. Luvu Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$131K is lower than Flexsteel Industries, Inc.'s net income of $6.6M. Notably, Luvu Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flexsteel Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luvu Brands, Inc. is 0.10x versus 0.67x for Flexsteel Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hooker Furnishings Corp. has a net margin of -2.24% compared to Luvu Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -17.77%. Luvu Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.27% beat Hooker Furnishings Corp.'s return on equity of -10.94%.

Luvu Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hooker Furnishings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.76%. Given that Hooker Furnishings Corp. has higher upside potential than Luvu Brands, Inc., analysts believe Hooker Furnishings Corp. is more attractive than Luvu Brands, Inc..

Luvu Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.552, which suggesting that the stock is 55.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hooker Furnishings Corp. has a beta of 1.389, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.937%.

Luvu Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hooker Furnishings Corp. offers a yield of 5.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Luvu Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings Corp. pays out 77.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luvu Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than Hooker Furnishings Corp. quarterly revenues of $70.7M. Luvu Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$131K is higher than Hooker Furnishings Corp.'s net income of -$12.6M. Notably, Luvu Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hooker Furnishings Corp.'s PE ratio is 121.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luvu Brands, Inc. is 0.10x versus 0.46x for Hooker Furnishings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.