LUGDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DynaResource, Inc. has a net margin of 46.46% compared to Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net margin of 8.92%. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 54.62% beat DynaResource, Inc.'s return on equity of 47.29%.

Lundin Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -79.25%. On the other hand DynaResource, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lundin Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than DynaResource, Inc., analysts believe Lundin Gold, Inc. is more attractive than DynaResource, Inc..

Lundin Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DynaResource, Inc. has a beta of 0.601, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.893%.

Lundin Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. DynaResource, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold, Inc. pays 46.01% of its earnings as a dividend. DynaResource, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lundin Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $447.1M, which are larger than DynaResource, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.1M. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net income of $207.7M is higher than DynaResource, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M. Notably, Lundin Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.19x while DynaResource, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold, Inc. is 13.41x versus 0.83x for DynaResource, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a net margin of 46.46% compared to Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net margin of 3.66%. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 54.62% beat Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96%.

Lundin Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -79.25%. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 56.92%. Given that Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lundin Gold, Inc., analysts believe Flexible Solutions International, Inc. is more attractive than Lundin Gold, Inc..

Lundin Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.501%.

Lundin Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Lundin Gold, Inc. pays 46.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lundin Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $447.1M, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net income of $207.7M is higher than Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s net income of $386.7K. Notably, Lundin Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.19x while Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 48.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold, Inc. is 13.41x versus 2.32x for Flexible Solutions International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 46.46% compared to Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 54.62% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

Lundin Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -79.25%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 37.1%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Lundin Gold, Inc., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Lundin Gold, Inc..

Lundin Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.

Lundin Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold, Inc. pays 46.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lundin Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $447.1M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net income of $207.7M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Lundin Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.19x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold, Inc. is 13.41x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of 46.46% compared to Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 54.62% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

Lundin Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -79.25%. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 117.08%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Lundin Gold, Inc., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Lundin Gold, Inc..

Lundin Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.966%.

Lundin Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold, Inc. pays 46.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lundin Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $447.1M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net income of $207.7M is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Lundin Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.19x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold, Inc. is 13.41x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.