LUGDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DynaResource has a net margin of 42.01% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of -7.77%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 30.34% beat DynaResource's return on equity of -197.22%.

Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -14.16%. On the other hand DynaResource has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lundin Gold has higher upside potential than DynaResource, analysts believe Lundin Gold is more attractive than DynaResource.

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 8.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DynaResource has a beta of 0.108, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.169%.

Lundin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. DynaResource offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold pays 52.89% of its earnings as a dividend. DynaResource pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lundin Gold quarterly revenues are $323.1M, which are larger than DynaResource quarterly revenues of $11.2M. Lundin Gold's net income of $135.7M is higher than DynaResource's net income of -$870.5K. Notably, Lundin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.82x while DynaResource's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold is 4.93x versus 0.63x for DynaResource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexible Solutions International has a net margin of 42.01% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 6.57%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 30.34% beat Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 10.76%.

Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -14.16%. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 48.65%. Given that Flexible Solutions International has higher upside potential than Lundin Gold, analysts believe Flexible Solutions International is more attractive than Lundin Gold.

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 8.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.510, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51%.

Lundin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. Flexible Solutions International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold pays 52.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International pays out 22.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lundin Gold quarterly revenues are $323.1M, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues of $9.3M. Lundin Gold's net income of $135.7M is higher than Flexible Solutions International's net income of $611.9K. Notably, Lundin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.82x while Flexible Solutions International's PE ratio is 11.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold is 4.93x versus 1.20x for Flexible Solutions International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 42.01% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of --. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 30.34% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -14.16%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 234.92%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Lundin Gold, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Lundin Gold.

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 8.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Lundin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold pays 52.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lundin Gold quarterly revenues are $323.1M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Lundin Gold's net income of $135.7M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Lundin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.82x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold is 4.93x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 42.01% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of --. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 30.34% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -14.16%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 149.46%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Lundin Gold, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Lundin Gold.

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 8.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

Lundin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold pays 52.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lundin Gold quarterly revenues are $323.1M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Lundin Gold's net income of $135.7M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Lundin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.82x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold is 4.93x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.