Does DraftKings Stock Have a Moat?
DraftKings (NASDAQ:DKNG) has been one of the largest beneficiaries of…
Sell
34
AUMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.29
Seasonality move
:
16.52%
Day range:
$0.29 - $0.30
52-week range:
$0.07 - $0.57
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.22x
P/B ratio:
11.10x
Volume:
24K
Avg. volume:
92.9K
1-year change:
-3.19%
Market cap:
$4.5M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.16
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals Co.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
$629.9M | $0.84 | 2.89% | 194.19% | $35.00 |
|
DYNR
DynaResource, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
-- | -$0.02 | -- | -50% | $1.70 |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -64.16% | $1.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals Co.
|
$0.30 | -- | $4.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.22x |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
$29.04 | $35.00 | $2.7B | 36.36x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.12x |
|
DYNR
DynaResource, Inc.
|
$1.45 | -- | $42.4M | 41.67x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.81x |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries, Inc.
|
$22.37 | -- | $159.1M | 13.74x | $0.04 | 0.72% | 0.31x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
$1.08 | $1.70 | $84.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
$0.60 | $1.50 | $54.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals Co.
|
-- | -3.638 | -- | 0.59x |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
45.47% | 2.414 | 22.94% | 0.71x |
|
DYNR
DynaResource, Inc.
|
84.51% | 2.319 | 52.65% | 0.09x |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries, Inc.
|
39.84% | 0.381 | 59.86% | 0.95x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
25.73% | 1.533 | 26.55% | 2.05x |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
0.07% | 0.324 | 0.03% | 17.12x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals Co.
|
-- | -$928K | -193.83% | -193.83% | -1049.67% | -$2.8M |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
$77.3M | $58.3M | 5.64% | 10.05% | 9.22% | -$18.1M |
|
DYNR
DynaResource, Inc.
|
$5.1M | $2.7M | 1.45% | 5.68% | 17.3% | -$2.1M |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries, Inc.
|
$9.2M | $2.9M | 6.68% | 8.53% | 1.89% | -$2M |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
-$162.6K | -$2.1M | -19.17% | -25.37% | -- | -$2.7M |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
-$18K | -$2M | -20.56% | -20.59% | -- | -$1.7M |
Golden Minerals Co. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or CENX?
Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of 1.68%. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 10.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4M CENXCentury Aluminum Co.12.23% $0.14 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or CENX?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 400%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.97%. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum Co., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than Century Aluminum Co..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 CENXCentury Aluminum Co.3 0 0 -
Is AUMN or CENX More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -0.614, which suggesting that the stock is 161.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.615%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or CENX?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or CENX?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $632.2M. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$923K is lower than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 36.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus 1.12x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$923K CENXCentury Aluminum Co.1.12x 36.36x $632.2M $10.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or DYNR?
DynaResource, Inc. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of 3.17%. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat DynaResource, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4M DYNRDynaResource, Inc.32.21% $0.03 $25.3M -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or DYNR?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 400%. On the other hand DynaResource, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than DynaResource, Inc., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than DynaResource, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 DYNRDynaResource, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is AUMN or DYNR More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -0.614, which suggesting that the stock is 161.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DynaResource, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.492%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or DYNR?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DynaResource, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DynaResource, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or DYNR?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DynaResource, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.9M. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$923K is lower than DynaResource, Inc.'s net income of $504K. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DynaResource, Inc.'s PE ratio is 41.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus 0.81x for DynaResource, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$923K DYNRDynaResource, Inc.0.81x 41.67x $15.9M $504K
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or FRD?
Friedman Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of 1.45%. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4M FRDFriedman Industries, Inc.6.02% $0.32 $231.5M -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or FRD?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 400%. On the other hand Friedman Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 FRDFriedman Industries, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is AUMN or FRD More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -0.614, which suggesting that the stock is 161.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.488, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.762%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or FRD?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or FRD?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $152.4M. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$923K is lower than Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Friedman Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus 0.31x for Friedman Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$923K FRDFriedman Industries, Inc.0.31x 13.74x $152.4M $2.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or PZG?
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -25.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4M PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.-- -$0.04 $45.2M -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or PZG?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 400%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 57.41%. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.1 0 0 -
Is AUMN or PZG More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -0.614, which suggesting that the stock is 161.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.238, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.849%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or PZG?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or PZG?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$923K is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$923K PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.-- -- -- -$2.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or XPL?
Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4M XPLSolitario Resources Corp.-- -$0.02 $24.8M -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or XPL?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 400%. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 151.76%. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than Solitario Resources Corp., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than Solitario Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 XPLSolitario Resources Corp.1 0 0 -
Is AUMN or XPL More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -0.614, which suggesting that the stock is 161.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.527, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.326%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or XPL?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or XPL?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$923K is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$923K XPLSolitario Resources Corp.-- -- -- -$1.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is It Time To Buy Unity Stock?
Unity Software (NYSE:U) is the business behind the popular Unity…
Are Lower Oil Prices Bad for Exxon?
With crude oil prices down from about $70 at the…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
44
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Sell
17
CTEV alert for Nov 14
Claritev Corp. [CTEV] is down 2.08% over the past day.
Buy
62
BE alert for Nov 14
Bloom Energy Corp. [BE] is up 7.96% over the past day.
Buy
68
SEE alert for Nov 14
Sealed Air Corp. [SEE] is up 1.81% over the past day.
