Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
43
AUMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.29
Seasonality move
:
22.24%
Day range:
$0.28 - $0.31
52-week range:
$0.08 - $0.57
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.22x
P/B ratio:
11.10x
Volume:
45.5K
Avg. volume:
61.4K
1-year change:
230%
Market cap:
$4.5M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.23
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals Co.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BSTO
Blue Star Opportunities Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BYRG
Buyer Group International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DYNR
DynaResource, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -48.19% | $3.25 |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -58.73% | $1.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals Co.
|
$0.30 | -- | $4.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.22x |
|
BSTO
Blue Star Opportunities Corp.
|
$0.0108 | -- | $1.3M | 18.07x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.46x |
|
BYRG
Buyer Group International, Inc.
|
$0.0018 | -- | $7.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 82.23x |
|
DYNR
DynaResource, Inc.
|
$1.45 | -- | $42.7M | 24.25x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.86x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
$2.58 | $3.25 | $216.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
$0.79 | $1.50 | $71.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals Co.
|
-- | -5.875 | -- | 0.40x |
|
BSTO
Blue Star Opportunities Corp.
|
-- | 4.636 | -- | -- |
|
BYRG
Buyer Group International, Inc.
|
-- | -1.310 | -- | -- |
|
DYNR
DynaResource, Inc.
|
85.71% | 2.443 | 67.48% | 0.18x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
29.15% | 0.301 | 11.72% | 0.86x |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
0.07% | 0.692 | 0.03% | 17.12x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals Co.
|
-- | -$688K | -193.83% | -193.83% | -1049.67% | -$760K |
|
BSTO
Blue Star Opportunities Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BYRG
Buyer Group International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DYNR
DynaResource, Inc.
|
$2.7M | -$572.3K | 10.36% | 47.29% | -4.05% | -$2.1M |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
-$81.9K | -$2.1M | -32.08% | -43.51% | -- | -$1.4M |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
-$18K | -$2M | -20.56% | -20.59% | -- | -$1.7M |
Golden Minerals Co. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or BSTO?
Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4.8M BSTOBlue Star Opportunities Corp.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or BSTO?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 405.05%. On the other hand Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than Blue Star Opportunities Corp., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than Blue Star Opportunities Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 BSTOBlue Star Opportunities Corp.0 0 0 -
Is AUMN or BSTO More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 204.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a beta of -0.707, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 170.71%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or BSTO?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blue Star Opportunities Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Star Opportunities Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or BSTO?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Blue Star Opportunities Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$681K is higher than Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus 0.46x for Blue Star Opportunities Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$681K BSTOBlue Star Opportunities Corp.0.46x 18.07x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or BYRG?
Buyer Group International, Inc. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat Buyer Group International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4.8M BYRGBuyer Group International, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or BYRG?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 405.05%. On the other hand Buyer Group International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than Buyer Group International, Inc., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than Buyer Group International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 BYRGBuyer Group International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is AUMN or BYRG More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 204.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Buyer Group International, Inc. has a beta of 0.446, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.438%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or BYRG?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Buyer Group International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Buyer Group International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or BYRG?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Buyer Group International, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$681K is higher than Buyer Group International, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Buyer Group International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus 82.23x for Buyer Group International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$681K BYRGBuyer Group International, Inc.82.23x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or DYNR?
DynaResource, Inc. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of 8.92%. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat DynaResource, Inc.'s return on equity of 47.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4.8M DYNRDynaResource, Inc.18.93% $0.03 $30.8M -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or DYNR?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 405.05%. On the other hand DynaResource, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than DynaResource, Inc., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than DynaResource, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 DYNRDynaResource, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is AUMN or DYNR More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 204.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DynaResource, Inc. has a beta of 0.579, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.099%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or DYNR?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DynaResource, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DynaResource, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or DYNR?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DynaResource, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.1M. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$681K is lower than DynaResource, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DynaResource, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus 0.86x for DynaResource, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$681K DYNRDynaResource, Inc.0.86x 24.25x $14.1M $1.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or PZG?
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -43.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4.8M PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.-- -$0.06 $40.2M -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or PZG?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 405.05%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $3.25 which suggests that it could grow by 25.97%. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.1 0 0 -
Is AUMN or PZG More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 204.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.853%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or PZG?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or PZG?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$681K is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$681K PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.-- -- -- -$4.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or XPL?
Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4.8M XPLSolitario Resources Corp.-- -$0.02 $24.8M -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or XPL?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 405.05%. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 90.53%. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than Solitario Resources Corp., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than Solitario Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 XPLSolitario Resources Corp.2 0 0 -
Is AUMN or XPL More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 204.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.409, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.08%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or XPL?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or XPL?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$681K is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$681K XPLSolitario Resources Corp.-- -- -- -$1.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
50
AXTI alert for Mar 3
AXT, Inc. [AXTI] is down 12.67% over the past day.
Buy
53
AAOI alert for Mar 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is down 7.5% over the past day.
Sell
32
TPB alert for Mar 3
Turning Point Brands, Inc. [TPB] is down 0.56% over the past day.
