Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
35
AUMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.33
Seasonality move
:
26.77%
Day range:
$0.31 - $0.33
52-week range:
$0.07 - $0.57
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.22x
P/B ratio:
11.10x
Volume:
7K
Avg. volume:
75.5K
1-year change:
266.67%
Market cap:
$5M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.23
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals Co.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
$728M | $1.73 | 2.89% | 185.88% | $40.00 |
|
DYNR
DynaResource, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
|
$812M | $1.63 | 17.78% | 221.06% | $106.50 |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
-- | -$0.02 | -- | -50% | $1.70 |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -64.16% | $1.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals Co.
|
$0.33 | -- | $5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.22x |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
$40.18 | $40.00 | $3.8B | 50.31x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.55x |
|
DYNR
DynaResource, Inc.
|
$1.39 | -- | $40.9M | 23.32x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.83x |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
|
$117.55 | $106.50 | $1.9B | 21.23x | $0.77 | 2.62% | 0.60x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
$1.24 | $1.70 | $97.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
$0.69 | $1.50 | $62.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals Co.
|
-- | -2.801 | -- | 0.40x |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
45.47% | 1.899 | 22.94% | 0.71x |
|
DYNR
DynaResource, Inc.
|
85.71% | 2.248 | 67.48% | 0.18x |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
|
57.11% | 1.986 | 85.84% | 0.92x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
27.01% | 2.031 | 12.18% | 1.08x |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
0.07% | 0.780 | 0.03% | 17.12x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUMN
Golden Minerals Co.
|
-- | -$688K | -193.83% | -193.83% | -1049.67% | -$760K |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
$77.3M | $58.3M | 5.64% | 10.05% | 9.22% | -$18.1M |
|
DYNR
DynaResource, Inc.
|
$2.7M | -$572.3K | 10.36% | 47.29% | -4.05% | -$2.1M |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
|
$82.7M | $48.8M | 5.03% | 12.44% | 5.79% | $34.5M |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
-$95.7K | -$1.5M | -25.69% | -34.36% | -- | -$1.1M |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
-$18K | -$2M | -20.56% | -20.59% | -- | -$1.7M |
Golden Minerals Co. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or CENX?
Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of 1.68%. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 10.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4.8M CENXCentury Aluminum Co.12.23% $0.14 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or CENX?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 354.55%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.45%. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum Co., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than Century Aluminum Co..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 CENXCentury Aluminum Co.3 0 0 -
Is AUMN or CENX More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 195.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.528%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or CENX?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or CENX?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $632.2M. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$681K is lower than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 50.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus 1.55x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$681K CENXCentury Aluminum Co.1.55x 50.31x $632.2M $10.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or DYNR?
DynaResource, Inc. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of 8.92%. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat DynaResource, Inc.'s return on equity of 47.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4.8M DYNRDynaResource, Inc.18.93% $0.03 $30.8M -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or DYNR?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 354.55%. On the other hand DynaResource, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than DynaResource, Inc., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than DynaResource, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 DYNRDynaResource, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is AUMN or DYNR More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 195.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DynaResource, Inc. has a beta of 0.601, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.893%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or DYNR?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DynaResource, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DynaResource, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or DYNR?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DynaResource, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.1M. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$681K is lower than DynaResource, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DynaResource, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus 0.83x for DynaResource, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$681K DYNRDynaResource, Inc.0.83x 23.32x $14.1M $1.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or KALU?
Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of 4.68%. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 12.44%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4.8M KALUKaiser Aluminum Corp.9.8% $2.38 $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or KALU?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 354.55%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could fall by -9.4%. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum Corp., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 KALUKaiser Aluminum Corp.1 1 0 -
Is AUMN or KALU More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 195.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.511, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.066%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or KALU?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 107.4% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or KALU?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $843.5M. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$681K is lower than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $39.5M. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus 0.60x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$681K KALUKaiser Aluminum Corp.0.60x 21.23x $843.5M $39.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or PZG?
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4.8M PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.-- -$0.06 $43.2M -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or PZG?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 354.55%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 37.1%. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.1 0 0 -
Is AUMN or PZG More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 195.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or PZG?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or PZG?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$681K is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$681K PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.-- -- -- -$4.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns AUMN or XPL?
Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of -432.33% compared to Golden Minerals Co.'s net margin of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s return on equity of -193.83% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUMNGolden Minerals Co.-430% -$0.06 -$4.8M XPLSolitario Resources Corp.-- -$0.02 $24.8M -
What do Analysts Say About AUMN or XPL?
Golden Minerals Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 354.55%. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 117.08%. Given that Golden Minerals Co. has higher upside potential than Solitario Resources Corp., analysts believe Golden Minerals Co. is more attractive than Solitario Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0 0 0 XPLSolitario Resources Corp.2 0 0 -
Is AUMN or XPL More Risky?
Golden Minerals Co. has a beta of -0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 195.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.966%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUMN or XPL?
Golden Minerals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Minerals Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUMN or XPL?
Golden Minerals Co. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Golden Minerals Co.'s net income of -$681K is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Golden Minerals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Minerals Co. is 0.22x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUMNGolden Minerals Co.0.22x -- -- -$681K XPLSolitario Resources Corp.-- -- -- -$1.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
