DYNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of 3.17% compared to DynaResource, Inc.'s net margin of 1.68%. DynaResource, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.68% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 10.05%.

DynaResource, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.97%. Given that Century Aluminum Co. has higher upside potential than DynaResource, Inc., analysts believe Century Aluminum Co. is more attractive than DynaResource, Inc..

DynaResource, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, which suggesting that the stock is 44.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.615%.

DynaResource, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DynaResource, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DynaResource, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.9M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $632.2M. DynaResource, Inc.'s net income of $504K is lower than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, DynaResource, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.67x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 36.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DynaResource, Inc. is 0.81x versus 1.12x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 3.17% compared to DynaResource, Inc.'s net margin of 1.45%. DynaResource, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.68% beat Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53%.

DynaResource, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Friedman Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DynaResource, Inc. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe DynaResource, Inc. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

DynaResource, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, which suggesting that the stock is 44.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.488, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.762%.

DynaResource, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. DynaResource, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DynaResource, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.9M, which are smaller than Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $152.4M. DynaResource, Inc.'s net income of $504K is lower than Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, DynaResource, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.67x while Friedman Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DynaResource, Inc. is 0.81x versus 0.31x for Friedman Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 3.17% compared to DynaResource, Inc.'s net margin of --. DynaResource, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.68% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -25.37%.

DynaResource, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 57.41%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than DynaResource, Inc., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than DynaResource, Inc..

DynaResource, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, which suggesting that the stock is 44.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.238, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.849%.

DynaResource, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DynaResource, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DynaResource, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.9M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. DynaResource, Inc.'s net income of $504K is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$2.8M. Notably, DynaResource, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.67x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DynaResource, Inc. is 0.81x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of 3.17% compared to DynaResource, Inc.'s net margin of --. DynaResource, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.68% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

DynaResource, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 151.76%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than DynaResource, Inc., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than DynaResource, Inc..

DynaResource, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, which suggesting that the stock is 44.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.527, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.326%.

DynaResource, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DynaResource, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DynaResource, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.9M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. DynaResource, Inc.'s net income of $504K is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, DynaResource, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.67x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DynaResource, Inc. is 0.81x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.