LMHDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

SEALSQ has a net margin of -- compared to LEM Holding SA's net margin of --. LEM Holding SA's return on equity of 20.49% beat SEALSQ's return on equity of -410.54%.

LEM Holding SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SEALSQ has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -77.36%. Given that SEALSQ has higher upside potential than LEM Holding SA, analysts believe SEALSQ is more attractive than LEM Holding SA.

LEM Holding SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEALSQ has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LEM Holding SA has a quarterly dividend of $55.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. SEALSQ offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LEM Holding SA pays 90.7% of its earnings as a dividend. SEALSQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LEM Holding SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LEM Holding SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SEALSQ quarterly revenues of --. LEM Holding SA's net income of -- is lower than SEALSQ's net income of --. Notably, LEM Holding SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.02x while SEALSQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LEM Holding SA is 7.46x versus 5.62x for SEALSQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Logitech International SA has a net margin of -- compared to LEM Holding SA's net margin of 13.04%. LEM Holding SA's return on equity of 20.49% beat Logitech International SA's return on equity of 32.21%.

LEM Holding SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Logitech International SA has an analysts' consensus of $89.52 which suggests that it could grow by 3.67%. Given that Logitech International SA has higher upside potential than LEM Holding SA, analysts believe Logitech International SA is more attractive than LEM Holding SA.

LEM Holding SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Logitech International SA has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.382%.

LEM Holding SA has a quarterly dividend of $55.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. Logitech International SA offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. LEM Holding SA pays 90.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Logitech International SA pays out 29.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LEM Holding SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Logitech International SA quarterly revenues of $1.1B. LEM Holding SA's net income of -- is lower than Logitech International SA's net income of $145.5M. Notably, LEM Holding SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.02x while Logitech International SA's PE ratio is 19.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LEM Holding SA is 7.46x versus 3.00x for Logitech International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sportradar Group AG has a net margin of -- compared to LEM Holding SA's net margin of 14.6%. LEM Holding SA's return on equity of 20.49% beat Sportradar Group AG's return on equity of 6.79%.

LEM Holding SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sportradar Group AG has an analysts' consensus of $17.96 which suggests that it could fall by -0.86%. Given that Sportradar Group AG has higher upside potential than LEM Holding SA, analysts believe Sportradar Group AG is more attractive than LEM Holding SA.

LEM Holding SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sportradar Group AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LEM Holding SA has a quarterly dividend of $55.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. Sportradar Group AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LEM Holding SA pays 90.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Sportradar Group AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LEM Holding SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LEM Holding SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sportradar Group AG quarterly revenues of $280.6M. LEM Holding SA's net income of -- is lower than Sportradar Group AG's net income of $41M. Notably, LEM Holding SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.02x while Sportradar Group AG's PE ratio is 88.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LEM Holding SA is 7.46x versus 14.63x for Sportradar Group AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WISeKey International Holding has a net margin of -- compared to LEM Holding SA's net margin of --. LEM Holding SA's return on equity of 20.49% beat WISeKey International Holding's return on equity of -88.78%.

LEM Holding SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WISeKey International Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -56.16%. Given that WISeKey International Holding has higher upside potential than LEM Holding SA, analysts believe WISeKey International Holding is more attractive than LEM Holding SA.

LEM Holding SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WISeKey International Holding has a beta of 1.263, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.263%.

LEM Holding SA has a quarterly dividend of $55.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. WISeKey International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LEM Holding SA pays 90.7% of its earnings as a dividend. WISeKey International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LEM Holding SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LEM Holding SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WISeKey International Holding quarterly revenues of --. LEM Holding SA's net income of -- is lower than WISeKey International Holding's net income of --. Notably, LEM Holding SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.02x while WISeKey International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LEM Holding SA is 7.46x versus 4.41x for WISeKey International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.