LAES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Garmin has a net margin of -- compared to SEALSQ's net margin of 23.91%. SEALSQ's return on equity of -72.18% beat Garmin's return on equity of 19.27%.

SEALSQ has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 135.29%. On the other hand Garmin has an analysts' consensus of $212.57 which suggests that it could grow by 14.69%. Given that SEALSQ has higher upside potential than Garmin, analysts believe SEALSQ is more attractive than Garmin.

SEALSQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Garmin has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.5%.

SEALSQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Garmin offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. SEALSQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Garmin pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Garmin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SEALSQ quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Garmin quarterly revenues of $1.8B. SEALSQ's net income of -- is lower than Garmin's net income of $435.7M. Notably, SEALSQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Garmin's PE ratio is 25.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEALSQ is 6.44x versus 5.69x for Garmin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Logitech International SA has a net margin of -- compared to SEALSQ's net margin of 14.93%. SEALSQ's return on equity of -72.18% beat Logitech International SA's return on equity of 30.08%.

SEALSQ has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 135.29%. On the other hand Logitech International SA has an analysts' consensus of $97.26 which suggests that it could grow by 36.22%. Given that SEALSQ has higher upside potential than Logitech International SA, analysts believe SEALSQ is more attractive than Logitech International SA.

SEALSQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Logitech International SA has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.717%.

SEALSQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Logitech International SA offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. SEALSQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Logitech International SA pays out 29.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Logitech International SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SEALSQ quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Logitech International SA quarterly revenues of $1.3B. SEALSQ's net income of -- is lower than Logitech International SA's net income of $200.1M. Notably, SEALSQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Logitech International SA's PE ratio is 16.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEALSQ is 6.44x versus 2.42x for Logitech International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sportradar Group AG has a net margin of -- compared to SEALSQ's net margin of -0.36%. SEALSQ's return on equity of -72.18% beat Sportradar Group AG's return on equity of 3.89%.

SEALSQ has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 135.29%. On the other hand Sportradar Group AG has an analysts' consensus of $25.61 which suggests that it could grow by 20.86%. Given that SEALSQ has higher upside potential than Sportradar Group AG, analysts believe SEALSQ is more attractive than Sportradar Group AG.

SEALSQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sportradar Group AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SEALSQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sportradar Group AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SEALSQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sportradar Group AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SEALSQ quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sportradar Group AG quarterly revenues of $327.3M. SEALSQ's net income of -- is lower than Sportradar Group AG's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, SEALSQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sportradar Group AG's PE ratio is 186.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEALSQ is 6.44x versus 5.63x for Sportradar Group AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WISeKey International Holding has a net margin of -- compared to SEALSQ's net margin of --. SEALSQ's return on equity of -72.18% beat WISeKey International Holding's return on equity of -88.78%.

SEALSQ has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 135.29%. On the other hand WISeKey International Holding has an analysts' consensus of $6.93 which suggests that it could grow by 78.64%. Given that SEALSQ has higher upside potential than WISeKey International Holding, analysts believe SEALSQ is more attractive than WISeKey International Holding.

SEALSQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WISeKey International Holding has a beta of 1.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.139%.

SEALSQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WISeKey International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SEALSQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WISeKey International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SEALSQ quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WISeKey International Holding quarterly revenues of --. SEALSQ's net income of -- is lower than WISeKey International Holding's net income of --. Notably, SEALSQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WISeKey International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEALSQ is 6.44x versus 1.78x for WISeKey International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.