GB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

SEALSQ has a net margin of 24.18% compared to Global Blue Group Holding AG's net margin of --. Global Blue Group Holding AG's return on equity of 65.59% beat SEALSQ's return on equity of -72.18%.

Global Blue Group Holding AG has a consensus price target of $7.07, signalling downside risk potential of -3.96%. On the other hand SEALSQ has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 128.14%. Given that SEALSQ has higher upside potential than Global Blue Group Holding AG, analysts believe SEALSQ is more attractive than Global Blue Group Holding AG.

Global Blue Group Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEALSQ has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Global Blue Group Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SEALSQ offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Blue Group Holding AG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SEALSQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Blue Group Holding AG quarterly revenues are $140.1M, which are larger than SEALSQ quarterly revenues of --. Global Blue Group Holding AG's net income of $33.9M is higher than SEALSQ's net income of --. Notably, Global Blue Group Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.96x while SEALSQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Blue Group Holding AG is 2.82x versus 6.65x for SEALSQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Logitech International SA has a net margin of 24.18% compared to Global Blue Group Holding AG's net margin of 14.93%. Global Blue Group Holding AG's return on equity of 65.59% beat Logitech International SA's return on equity of 30.08%.

Global Blue Group Holding AG has a consensus price target of $7.07, signalling downside risk potential of -3.96%. On the other hand Logitech International SA has an analysts' consensus of $97.26 which suggests that it could grow by 11.86%. Given that Logitech International SA has higher upside potential than Global Blue Group Holding AG, analysts believe Logitech International SA is more attractive than Global Blue Group Holding AG.

Global Blue Group Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Logitech International SA has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.373%.

Global Blue Group Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Logitech International SA offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Global Blue Group Holding AG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Logitech International SA pays out 29.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Logitech International SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Blue Group Holding AG quarterly revenues are $140.1M, which are smaller than Logitech International SA quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Global Blue Group Holding AG's net income of $33.9M is lower than Logitech International SA's net income of $200.1M. Notably, Global Blue Group Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.96x while Logitech International SA's PE ratio is 20.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Blue Group Holding AG is 2.82x versus 2.94x for Logitech International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sportradar Group AG has a net margin of 24.18% compared to Global Blue Group Holding AG's net margin of -0.36%. Global Blue Group Holding AG's return on equity of 65.59% beat Sportradar Group AG's return on equity of 3.89%.

Global Blue Group Holding AG has a consensus price target of $7.07, signalling downside risk potential of -3.96%. On the other hand Sportradar Group AG has an analysts' consensus of $24.77 which suggests that it could grow by 12.69%. Given that Sportradar Group AG has higher upside potential than Global Blue Group Holding AG, analysts believe Sportradar Group AG is more attractive than Global Blue Group Holding AG.

Global Blue Group Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sportradar Group AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Global Blue Group Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sportradar Group AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Blue Group Holding AG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sportradar Group AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Blue Group Holding AG quarterly revenues are $140.1M, which are smaller than Sportradar Group AG quarterly revenues of $327.3M. Global Blue Group Holding AG's net income of $33.9M is higher than Sportradar Group AG's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Global Blue Group Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.96x while Sportradar Group AG's PE ratio is 193.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Blue Group Holding AG is 2.82x versus 5.84x for Sportradar Group AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WISeKey International Holding has a net margin of 24.18% compared to Global Blue Group Holding AG's net margin of --. Global Blue Group Holding AG's return on equity of 65.59% beat WISeKey International Holding's return on equity of -88.78%.

Global Blue Group Holding AG has a consensus price target of $7.07, signalling downside risk potential of -3.96%. On the other hand WISeKey International Holding has an analysts' consensus of $6.93 which suggests that it could grow by 57.17%. Given that WISeKey International Holding has higher upside potential than Global Blue Group Holding AG, analysts believe WISeKey International Holding is more attractive than Global Blue Group Holding AG.

Global Blue Group Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WISeKey International Holding has a beta of 1.314, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.416%.

Global Blue Group Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WISeKey International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Blue Group Holding AG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WISeKey International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Blue Group Holding AG quarterly revenues are $140.1M, which are larger than WISeKey International Holding quarterly revenues of --. Global Blue Group Holding AG's net income of $33.9M is higher than WISeKey International Holding's net income of --. Notably, Global Blue Group Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.96x while WISeKey International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Blue Group Holding AG is 2.82x versus 1.99x for WISeKey International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.