Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
40
LLKKF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.03
Seasonality move
:
74.55%
Day range:
$0.03 - $0.03
52-week range:
$0.02 - $0.11
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
0.47x
Volume:
175.6K
Avg. volume:
263.2K
1-year change:
-69.72%
Market cap:
$48.3M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LLKKF
Lake Resources NL
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $55.80 |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LLKKF
Lake Resources NL
|
$0.03 | -- | $48.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
$49.20 | $55.80 | $124.7B | 15.82x | $1.48 | 5.94% | 2.24x |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.18x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
$0.06 | -- | $16.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.89x |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
$12.60 | -- | $57.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
$0.11 | -- | $42M | 46.32x | $0.01 | 169.74% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LLKKF
Lake Resources NL
|
-- | -2.686 | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
28.87% | 0.884 | 11.7% | 1.27x |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
9.38% | 0.068 | 6.83% | 1.16x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
38.76% | 0.000 | 18.45% | 0.44x |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | 4.553 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LLKKF
Lake Resources NL
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
-- | -- | 11.7% | 16.54% | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
-- | -- | -24.73% | -26.41% | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
-- | -- | -33.72% | -45.85% | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Lake Resources NL vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LLKKF or BHP?
BHP Group has a net margin of -- compared to Lake Resources NL's net margin of --. Lake Resources NL's return on equity of -- beat BHP Group's return on equity of 16.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- BHPBHP Group-- -- $66.7B -
What do Analysts Say About LLKKF or BHP?
Lake Resources NL has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BHP Group has an analysts' consensus of $55.80 which suggests that it could grow by 13.42%. Given that BHP Group has higher upside potential than Lake Resources NL, analysts believe BHP Group is more attractive than Lake Resources NL.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LLKKFLake Resources NL0 0 0 BHPBHP Group3 3 0 -
Is LLKKF or BHP More Risky?
Lake Resources NL has a beta of -3.445, which suggesting that the stock is 444.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BHP Group has a beta of 0.954, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.618%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LLKKF or BHP?
Lake Resources NL has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BHP Group offers a yield of 5.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.48 per share. Lake Resources NL pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group pays out 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LLKKF or BHP?
Lake Resources NL quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BHP Group quarterly revenues of --. Lake Resources NL's net income of -- is lower than BHP Group's net income of --. Notably, Lake Resources NL's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BHP Group's PE ratio is 15.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lake Resources NL is -- versus 2.24x for BHP Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- -- BHPBHP Group2.24x 15.82x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LLKKF or FTZZF?
Fertoz has a net margin of -- compared to Lake Resources NL's net margin of --. Lake Resources NL's return on equity of -- beat Fertoz's return on equity of -26.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- FTZZFFertoz-- -- $7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About LLKKF or FTZZF?
Lake Resources NL has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fertoz has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lake Resources NL has higher upside potential than Fertoz, analysts believe Lake Resources NL is more attractive than Fertoz.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LLKKFLake Resources NL0 0 0 FTZZFFertoz0 0 0 -
Is LLKKF or FTZZF More Risky?
Lake Resources NL has a beta of -3.445, which suggesting that the stock is 444.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fertoz has a beta of -0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.613%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LLKKF or FTZZF?
Lake Resources NL has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fertoz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lake Resources NL pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fertoz pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LLKKF or FTZZF?
Lake Resources NL quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fertoz quarterly revenues of --. Lake Resources NL's net income of -- is lower than Fertoz's net income of --. Notably, Lake Resources NL's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fertoz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lake Resources NL is -- versus 1.18x for Fertoz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- -- FTZZFFertoz1.18x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LLKKF or HMIFF?
Harvest Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Lake Resources NL's net margin of --. Lake Resources NL's return on equity of -- beat Harvest Minerals's return on equity of -45.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals-- -- $5.2M -
What do Analysts Say About LLKKF or HMIFF?
Lake Resources NL has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lake Resources NL has higher upside potential than Harvest Minerals, analysts believe Lake Resources NL is more attractive than Harvest Minerals.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LLKKFLake Resources NL0 0 0 HMIFFHarvest Minerals0 0 0 -
Is LLKKF or HMIFF More Risky?
Lake Resources NL has a beta of -3.445, which suggesting that the stock is 444.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LLKKF or HMIFF?
Lake Resources NL has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harvest Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lake Resources NL pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LLKKF or HMIFF?
Lake Resources NL quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Lake Resources NL's net income of -- is lower than Harvest Minerals's net income of --. Notably, Lake Resources NL's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harvest Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lake Resources NL is -- versus 4.89x for Harvest Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals4.89x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LLKKF or NVA?
Nova Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Lake Resources NL's net margin of --. Lake Resources NL's return on equity of -- beat Nova Minerals's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LLKKF or NVA?
Lake Resources NL has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 98.41%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than Lake Resources NL, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than Lake Resources NL.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LLKKFLake Resources NL0 0 0 NVANova Minerals0 0 0 -
Is LLKKF or NVA More Risky?
Lake Resources NL has a beta of -3.445, which suggesting that the stock is 444.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LLKKF or NVA?
Lake Resources NL has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nova Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lake Resources NL pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LLKKF or NVA?
Lake Resources NL quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Lake Resources NL's net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals's net income of --. Notably, Lake Resources NL's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nova Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lake Resources NL is -- versus -- for Nova Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- -- NVANova Minerals-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LLKKF or SBMSF?
Danakali has a net margin of -- compared to Lake Resources NL's net margin of --. Lake Resources NL's return on equity of -- beat Danakali's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- SBMSFDanakali-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LLKKF or SBMSF?
Lake Resources NL has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lake Resources NL has higher upside potential than Danakali, analysts believe Lake Resources NL is more attractive than Danakali.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LLKKFLake Resources NL0 0 0 SBMSFDanakali0 0 0 -
Is LLKKF or SBMSF More Risky?
Lake Resources NL has a beta of -3.445, which suggesting that the stock is 444.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali has a beta of 1.672, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.245%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LLKKF or SBMSF?
Lake Resources NL has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Danakali offers a yield of 169.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Lake Resources NL pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LLKKF or SBMSF?
Lake Resources NL quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali quarterly revenues of --. Lake Resources NL's net income of -- is lower than Danakali's net income of --. Notably, Lake Resources NL's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Danakali's PE ratio is 46.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lake Resources NL is -- versus -- for Danakali. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- -- SBMSFDanakali-- 46.32x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
