Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
64
LLKKF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.06
Seasonality move
:
62.37%
Day range:
$0.05 - $0.07
52-week range:
$0.01 - $0.11
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
0.59x
Volume:
179.2K
Avg. volume:
566.2K
1-year change:
148.96%
Market cap:
$142.6M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.01
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LLKKF
Lake Resources NL
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LLKKF
Lake Resources NL
|
$0.06 | -- | $142.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.25x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
$0.06 | -- | $29.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 13.60x |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
$0.35 | -- | $91.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 208.61x |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
$1.61 | -- | $618.3M | 101.84x | $0.03 | 0% | 0.28x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
$0.05 | -- | $18.4M | 47.38x | $0.01 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LLKKF
Lake Resources NL
|
-- | -0.550 | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
9.38% | 0.000 | -- | 1.16x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
38.76% | -0.121 | 18.45% | 0.44x |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | 0.324 | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
44.7% | -3.351 | -- | 1.20x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -0.421 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LLKKF
Lake Resources NL
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -24.73% | -26.41% | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -33.72% | -45.85% | -- | -- |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.75% | -1.2% | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Lake Resources NL vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LLKKF or FTZZF?
Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Lake Resources NL's net margin of --. Lake Resources NL's return on equity of -- beat Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s return on equity of -26.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.-- -- $7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About LLKKF or FTZZF?
Lake Resources NL has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lake Resources NL has higher upside potential than Canadian Phosphate Ltd., analysts believe Lake Resources NL is more attractive than Canadian Phosphate Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LLKKFLake Resources NL0 0 0 FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LLKKF or FTZZF More Risky?
Lake Resources NL has a beta of 1.492, which suggesting that the stock is 49.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a beta of -0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 189.253%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LLKKF or FTZZF?
Lake Resources NL has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lake Resources NL pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LLKKF or FTZZF?
Lake Resources NL quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Canadian Phosphate Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lake Resources NL's net income of -- is lower than Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Lake Resources NL's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lake Resources NL is -- versus 1.25x for Canadian Phosphate Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- -- FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.1.25x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LLKKF or HMIFF?
Harvest Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Lake Resources NL's net margin of --. Lake Resources NL's return on equity of -- beat Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -45.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.-- -- $5.2M -
What do Analysts Say About LLKKF or HMIFF?
Lake Resources NL has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lake Resources NL has higher upside potential than Harvest Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Lake Resources NL is more attractive than Harvest Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LLKKFLake Resources NL0 0 0 HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LLKKF or HMIFF More Risky?
Lake Resources NL has a beta of 1.492, which suggesting that the stock is 49.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LLKKF or HMIFF?
Lake Resources NL has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harvest Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lake Resources NL pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LLKKF or HMIFF?
Lake Resources NL quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lake Resources NL's net income of -- is lower than Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Lake Resources NL's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lake Resources NL is -- versus 13.60x for Harvest Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.13.60x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LLKKF or HZRGF?
Hazer Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Lake Resources NL's net margin of --. Lake Resources NL's return on equity of -- beat Hazer Group Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LLKKF or HZRGF?
Lake Resources NL has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hazer Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lake Resources NL has higher upside potential than Hazer Group Ltd., analysts believe Lake Resources NL is more attractive than Hazer Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LLKKFLake Resources NL0 0 0 HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LLKKF or HZRGF More Risky?
Lake Resources NL has a beta of 1.492, which suggesting that the stock is 49.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hazer Group Ltd. has a beta of 77.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7620.487%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LLKKF or HZRGF?
Lake Resources NL has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hazer Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lake Resources NL pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hazer Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LLKKF or HZRGF?
Lake Resources NL quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hazer Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lake Resources NL's net income of -- is lower than Hazer Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Lake Resources NL's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hazer Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lake Resources NL is -- versus 208.61x for Hazer Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- -- HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.208.61x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LLKKF or NUFMF?
Nufarm Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Lake Resources NL's net margin of --. Lake Resources NL's return on equity of -- beat Nufarm Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- NUFMFNufarm Ltd.-- -- $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About LLKKF or NUFMF?
Lake Resources NL has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nufarm Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lake Resources NL has higher upside potential than Nufarm Ltd., analysts believe Lake Resources NL is more attractive than Nufarm Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LLKKFLake Resources NL0 0 0 NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LLKKF or NUFMF More Risky?
Lake Resources NL has a beta of 1.492, which suggesting that the stock is 49.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nufarm Ltd. has a beta of -0.256, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.57%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LLKKF or NUFMF?
Lake Resources NL has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nufarm Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Lake Resources NL pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nufarm Ltd. pays out 951.71% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LLKKF or NUFMF?
Lake Resources NL quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nufarm Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lake Resources NL's net income of -- is lower than Nufarm Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Lake Resources NL's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nufarm Ltd.'s PE ratio is 101.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lake Resources NL is -- versus 0.28x for Nufarm Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- -- NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0.28x 101.84x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LLKKF or SBMSF?
Danakali Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Lake Resources NL's net margin of --. Lake Resources NL's return on equity of -- beat Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LLKKF or SBMSF?
Lake Resources NL has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lake Resources NL has higher upside potential than Danakali Ltd., analysts believe Lake Resources NL is more attractive than Danakali Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LLKKFLake Resources NL0 0 0 SBMSFDanakali Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LLKKF or SBMSF More Risky?
Lake Resources NL has a beta of 1.492, which suggesting that the stock is 49.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.229%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LLKKF or SBMSF?
Lake Resources NL has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Danakali Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Lake Resources NL pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LLKKF or SBMSF?
Lake Resources NL quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lake Resources NL's net income of -- is lower than Danakali Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Lake Resources NL's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Danakali Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lake Resources NL is -- versus -- for Danakali Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LLKKFLake Resources NL-- -- -- -- SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- 47.38x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 7
Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 37.11% over the past day.
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 7
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is up 28.33% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 7
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 26.08% over the past day.
