Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…
Sell
3
LBGUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$44.21
Seasonality move
:
2.36%
Day range:
$44.21 - $44.21
52-week range:
$44.21 - $53.11
Dividend yield:
0.91%
P/E ratio:
12.22x
P/S ratio:
3.71x
P/B ratio:
0.98x
Volume:
1.1K
Avg. volume:
38
1-year change:
-7.9%
Market cap:
$11B
Revenue:
$2.9B
EPS (TTM):
$3.62
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LBGUF
L E Lundbergforetagen AB
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BYNO
byNordic Acquisition
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EQBBF
EQT AB
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IVSBF
Investor AB
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VEFFF
VEF AB
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VSTKF
VNV Global AB
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LBGUF
L E Lundbergforetagen AB
|
$44.21 | -- | $11B | 12.22x | $0.40 | 0.91% | 3.71x |
|
BYNO
byNordic Acquisition
|
$11.40 | -- | $87.8M | 466.95x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
EQBBF
EQT AB
|
$29.57 | -- | $35B | 111.63x | $0.16 | 1.13% | 14.80x |
|
IVSBF
Investor AB
|
$26.53 | -- | $81.3B | 4.18x | $0.11 | 1.67% | 3.28x |
|
VEFFF
VEF AB
|
$0.20 | -- | $223.9M | 3.35x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
VSTKF
VNV Global AB
|
$2.42 | -- | $317M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LBGUF
L E Lundbergforetagen AB
|
-- | -0.108 | -- | 0.00x |
|
BYNO
byNordic Acquisition
|
-- | 0.031 | -- | -- |
|
EQBBF
EQT AB
|
21.02% | 1.275 | 6.28% | 5.97x |
|
IVSBF
Investor AB
|
10.08% | 0.907 | 10.13% | -- |
|
VEFFF
VEF AB
|
7.56% | -0.367 | 15.79% | 12.65x |
|
VSTKF
VNV Global AB
|
12.9% | 0.003 | 26.84% | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LBGUF
L E Lundbergforetagen AB
|
-- | $173.5M | 5.69% | 5.83% | 47.45% | $8M |
|
BYNO
byNordic Acquisition
|
-- | -$491.1K | -- | -- | -- | -$390.3K |
|
EQBBF
EQT AB
|
-- | -- | 3.4% | 4.45% | -- | -- |
|
IVSBF
Investor AB
|
-- | -- | 23.57% | 26.38% | 50.98% | -- |
|
VEFFF
VEF AB
|
-- | $41.3M | 10.89% | 11.63% | 92.84% | -$1.6M |
|
VSTKF
VNV Global AB
|
-- | -- | -17.97% | -21.17% | 94.24% | -$1.9M |
L E Lundbergforetagen AB vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LBGUF or BYNO?
byNordic Acquisition has a net margin of 31.11% compared to L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net margin of --. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's return on equity of 5.83% beat byNordic Acquisition's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB-- $0.83 $16.4B BYNObyNordic Acquisition-- -$0.02 -- -
What do Analysts Say About LBGUF or BYNO?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand byNordic Acquisition has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that L E Lundbergforetagen AB has higher upside potential than byNordic Acquisition, analysts believe L E Lundbergforetagen AB is more attractive than byNordic Acquisition.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB0 0 0 BYNObyNordic Acquisition0 0 0 -
Is LBGUF or BYNO More Risky?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison byNordic Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBGUF or BYNO?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. byNordic Acquisition offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. L E Lundbergforetagen AB pays 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. byNordic Acquisition pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBGUF or BYNO?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB quarterly revenues are $664.3M, which are larger than byNordic Acquisition quarterly revenues of --. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net income of $206.7M is higher than byNordic Acquisition's net income of -$206.2K. Notably, L E Lundbergforetagen AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.22x while byNordic Acquisition's PE ratio is 466.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L E Lundbergforetagen AB is 3.71x versus -- for byNordic Acquisition. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB3.71x 12.22x $664.3M $206.7M BYNObyNordic Acquisition-- 466.95x -- -$206.2K
-
Which has Higher Returns LBGUF or EQBBF?
EQT AB has a net margin of 31.11% compared to L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net margin of --. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's return on equity of 5.83% beat EQT AB's return on equity of 4.45%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB-- $0.83 $16.4B EQBBFEQT AB-- -- $10.2B -
What do Analysts Say About LBGUF or EQBBF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EQT AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that L E Lundbergforetagen AB has higher upside potential than EQT AB, analysts believe L E Lundbergforetagen AB is more attractive than EQT AB.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB0 0 0 EQBBFEQT AB0 0 0 -
Is LBGUF or EQBBF More Risky?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EQT AB has a beta of 0.898, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.189%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBGUF or EQBBF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. EQT AB offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. L E Lundbergforetagen AB pays 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. EQT AB pays out 229.72% of its earnings as a dividend. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT AB's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBGUF or EQBBF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB quarterly revenues are $664.3M, which are larger than EQT AB quarterly revenues of --. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net income of $206.7M is higher than EQT AB's net income of --. Notably, L E Lundbergforetagen AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.22x while EQT AB's PE ratio is 111.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L E Lundbergforetagen AB is 3.71x versus 14.80x for EQT AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB3.71x 12.22x $664.3M $206.7M EQBBFEQT AB14.80x 111.63x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LBGUF or IVSBF?
Investor AB has a net margin of 31.11% compared to L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net margin of 48.43%. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's return on equity of 5.83% beat Investor AB's return on equity of 26.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB-- $0.83 $16.4B IVSBFInvestor AB-- $0.40 $93.5B -
What do Analysts Say About LBGUF or IVSBF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Investor AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that L E Lundbergforetagen AB has higher upside potential than Investor AB, analysts believe L E Lundbergforetagen AB is more attractive than Investor AB.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB0 0 0 IVSBFInvestor AB0 0 0 -
Is LBGUF or IVSBF More Risky?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Investor AB has a beta of 1.136, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.601%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBGUF or IVSBF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Investor AB offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. L E Lundbergforetagen AB pays 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Investor AB pays out 10.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBGUF or IVSBF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB quarterly revenues are $664.3M, which are smaller than Investor AB quarterly revenues of $2.5B. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net income of $206.7M is lower than Investor AB's net income of $1.2B. Notably, L E Lundbergforetagen AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.22x while Investor AB's PE ratio is 4.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L E Lundbergforetagen AB is 3.71x versus 3.28x for Investor AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB3.71x 12.22x $664.3M $206.7M IVSBFInvestor AB3.28x 4.18x $2.5B $1.2B
-
Which has Higher Returns LBGUF or VEFFF?
VEF AB has a net margin of 31.11% compared to L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net margin of 89.8%. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's return on equity of 5.83% beat VEF AB's return on equity of 11.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB-- $0.83 $16.4B VEFFFVEF AB-- $0.04 $513.8M -
What do Analysts Say About LBGUF or VEFFF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VEF AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that L E Lundbergforetagen AB has higher upside potential than VEF AB, analysts believe L E Lundbergforetagen AB is more attractive than VEF AB.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB0 0 0 VEFFFVEF AB0 0 0 -
Is LBGUF or VEFFF More Risky?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VEF AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBGUF or VEFFF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. VEF AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. L E Lundbergforetagen AB pays 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. VEF AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBGUF or VEFFF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB quarterly revenues are $664.3M, which are larger than VEF AB quarterly revenues of $42.6M. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net income of $206.7M is higher than VEF AB's net income of $38.2M. Notably, L E Lundbergforetagen AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.22x while VEF AB's PE ratio is 3.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L E Lundbergforetagen AB is 3.71x versus -- for VEF AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB3.71x 12.22x $664.3M $206.7M VEFFFVEF AB-- 3.35x $42.6M $38.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns LBGUF or VSTKF?
VNV Global AB has a net margin of 31.11% compared to L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net margin of 99.11%. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's return on equity of 5.83% beat VNV Global AB's return on equity of -21.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB-- $0.83 $16.4B VSTKFVNV Global AB-- -$0.20 $659.6M -
What do Analysts Say About LBGUF or VSTKF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VNV Global AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that L E Lundbergforetagen AB has higher upside potential than VNV Global AB, analysts believe L E Lundbergforetagen AB is more attractive than VNV Global AB.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB0 0 0 VSTKFVNV Global AB0 0 0 -
Is LBGUF or VSTKF More Risky?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNV Global AB has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.117%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBGUF or VSTKF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. VNV Global AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. L E Lundbergforetagen AB pays 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. VNV Global AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBGUF or VSTKF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB quarterly revenues are $664.3M, which are larger than VNV Global AB quarterly revenues of -$25.8M. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net income of $206.7M is higher than VNV Global AB's net income of -$25.6M. Notably, L E Lundbergforetagen AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.22x while VNV Global AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L E Lundbergforetagen AB is 3.71x versus -- for VNV Global AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB3.71x 12.22x $664.3M $206.7M VSTKFVNV Global AB-- -- -$25.8M -$25.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is Marvell Stock Up?
Semiconductor and data infrastructure company Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL) absolutely trounced…
Why Is General Electric Stock Going Up?
General Electric Company, doing business these days as GE Aerospace…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
44
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
1
IONQ alert for Jan 10
IonQ [IONQ] is up 6.84% over the past day.
Sell
45
COLL alert for Jan 10
Collegium Pharmaceutical [COLL] is down 2.28% over the past day.
Sell
30
EDN alert for Jan 10
Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA [EDN] is down 1.52% over the past day.
