EQBBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Investor AB has a net margin of -- compared to EQT AB's net margin of 48.43%. EQT AB's return on equity of 4.45% beat Investor AB's return on equity of 26.38%.

EQT AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Investor AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EQT AB has higher upside potential than Investor AB, analysts believe EQT AB is more attractive than Investor AB.

EQT AB has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Investor AB has a beta of 1.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.996%.

EQT AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Investor AB offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. EQT AB pays 229.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Investor AB pays out 10.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Investor AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT AB's is not.

EQT AB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Investor AB quarterly revenues of $2.5B. EQT AB's net income of -- is lower than Investor AB's net income of $1.2B. Notably, EQT AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 111.63x while Investor AB's PE ratio is 4.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT AB is 14.80x versus 3.23x for Investor AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a net margin of -- compared to EQT AB's net margin of 31.11%. EQT AB's return on equity of 4.45% beat L E Lundbergforetagen AB's return on equity of 5.83%.

EQT AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand L E Lundbergforetagen AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EQT AB has higher upside potential than L E Lundbergforetagen AB, analysts believe EQT AB is more attractive than L E Lundbergforetagen AB.

EQT AB has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EQT AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. L E Lundbergforetagen AB offers a yield of 0.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. EQT AB pays 229.72% of its earnings as a dividend. L E Lundbergforetagen AB pays out 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT AB's is not.

EQT AB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than L E Lundbergforetagen AB quarterly revenues of $664.3M. EQT AB's net income of -- is lower than L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net income of $206.7M. Notably, EQT AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 111.63x while L E Lundbergforetagen AB's PE ratio is 14.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT AB is 14.80x versus 4.46x for L E Lundbergforetagen AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VEF AB has a net margin of -- compared to EQT AB's net margin of 89.8%. EQT AB's return on equity of 4.45% beat VEF AB's return on equity of 11.63%.

EQT AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VEF AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EQT AB has higher upside potential than VEF AB, analysts believe EQT AB is more attractive than VEF AB.

EQT AB has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VEF AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EQT AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. VEF AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EQT AB pays 229.72% of its earnings as a dividend. VEF AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EQT AB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VEF AB quarterly revenues of $42.6M. EQT AB's net income of -- is lower than VEF AB's net income of $38.2M. Notably, EQT AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 111.63x while VEF AB's PE ratio is 3.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT AB is 14.80x versus -- for VEF AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNV Global AB has a net margin of -- compared to EQT AB's net margin of 99.11%. EQT AB's return on equity of 4.45% beat VNV Global AB's return on equity of -21.17%.

EQT AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VNV Global AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EQT AB has higher upside potential than VNV Global AB, analysts believe EQT AB is more attractive than VNV Global AB.

EQT AB has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNV Global AB has a beta of 0.987, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.281%.

EQT AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. VNV Global AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EQT AB pays 229.72% of its earnings as a dividend. VNV Global AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EQT AB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VNV Global AB quarterly revenues of -$25.8M. EQT AB's net income of -- is lower than VNV Global AB's net income of -$25.6M. Notably, EQT AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 111.63x while VNV Global AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT AB is 14.80x versus -- for VNV Global AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.