EQBBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Investor AB has a net margin of -- compared to EQT AB's net margin of 79.38%. EQT AB's return on equity of 11.02% beat Investor AB's return on equity of 18.73%.

EQT AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Investor AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EQT AB has higher upside potential than Investor AB, analysts believe EQT AB is more attractive than Investor AB.

EQT AB has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.968% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Investor AB has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.962%.

EQT AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Investor AB offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. EQT AB pays 57.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Investor AB pays out 10.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EQT AB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Investor AB quarterly revenues of $2B. EQT AB's net income of -- is lower than Investor AB's net income of $5.9B. Notably, EQT AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.61x while Investor AB's PE ratio is 7.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT AB is 12.90x versus 8.70x for Investor AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinnevik AB has a net margin of -- compared to EQT AB's net margin of -55869.8%. EQT AB's return on equity of 11.02% beat Kinnevik AB's return on equity of -8.47%.

EQT AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kinnevik AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EQT AB has higher upside potential than Kinnevik AB, analysts believe EQT AB is more attractive than Kinnevik AB.

EQT AB has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.968% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinnevik AB has a beta of 1.186, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.604%.

EQT AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Kinnevik AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.21 per share. EQT AB pays 57.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinnevik AB pays out 242.85% of its earnings as a dividend. EQT AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kinnevik AB's is not.

EQT AB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kinnevik AB quarterly revenues of $318.9K. EQT AB's net income of -- is lower than Kinnevik AB's net income of -$178.2M. Notably, EQT AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.61x while Kinnevik AB's PE ratio is 101.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT AB is 12.90x versus 2,050.54x for Kinnevik AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VEF AB has a net margin of -- compared to EQT AB's net margin of 41.23%. EQT AB's return on equity of 11.02% beat VEF AB's return on equity of -14.7%.

EQT AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VEF AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EQT AB has higher upside potential than VEF AB, analysts believe EQT AB is more attractive than VEF AB.

EQT AB has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.968% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VEF AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EQT AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. VEF AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EQT AB pays 57.3% of its earnings as a dividend. VEF AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EQT AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EQT AB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VEF AB quarterly revenues of $156K. EQT AB's net income of -- is lower than VEF AB's net income of $21.3M. Notably, EQT AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.61x while VEF AB's PE ratio is 3.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT AB is 12.90x versus 21.09x for VEF AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNV Global AB has a net margin of -- compared to EQT AB's net margin of -72065.39%. EQT AB's return on equity of 11.02% beat VNV Global AB's return on equity of -5.07%.

EQT AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VNV Global AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EQT AB has higher upside potential than VNV Global AB, analysts believe EQT AB is more attractive than VNV Global AB.

EQT AB has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.968% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNV Global AB has a beta of 0.760, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.991%.

EQT AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. VNV Global AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EQT AB pays 57.3% of its earnings as a dividend. VNV Global AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EQT AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EQT AB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VNV Global AB quarterly revenues of $52K. EQT AB's net income of -- is lower than VNV Global AB's net income of -$37.5M. Notably, EQT AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.61x while VNV Global AB's PE ratio is 19.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT AB is 12.90x versus 878.21x for VNV Global AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.