Financhill
Sell
28

LBAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.0000
Seasonality move :
4.96%
Day range:
$0.0030 - $0.0037
52-week range:
$0.0013 - $0.0074
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
11.40x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
455K
Avg. volume:
153.2K
1-year change:
125%
Market cap:
$999.1K
Revenue:
$144.2K
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
LBAS
Location Based Technologies, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
CTM
Castellum, Inc.
$14.2M -- 37.95% -100% $3.00
INLX
Intellinetics, Inc.
$4.1M -- -3.16% -- $14.50
INUV
Inuvo, Inc.
$27.3M -$0.20 4.41% -1269.86% $10.88
SGN
Signing Day Sports, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
$40.3M -- 6.83% -- $9.33
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
LBAS
Location Based Technologies, Inc.
$0.0036 -- $999.1K -- $0.00 0% 11.40x
CTM
Castellum, Inc.
$0.90 $3.00 $85.5M -- $0.00 0% 1.40x
INLX
Intellinetics, Inc.
$7.98 $14.50 $35.7M 248.75x $0.00 0% 2.07x
INUV
Inuvo, Inc.
$2.48 $10.88 $35.8M -- $0.00 0% 1.97x
SGN
Signing Day Sports, Inc.
$0.95 -- $3.8M -- $0.00 0% 6.61x
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
$5.37 $9.33 $53.1M -- $0.00 0% 0.35x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
LBAS
Location Based Technologies, Inc.
-- 2.862 -- --
CTM
Castellum, Inc.
8.61% -1.158 3.36% 4.02x
INLX
Intellinetics, Inc.
14.18% -0.743 3.65% 0.89x
INUV
Inuvo, Inc.
28.68% 1.541 8.28% 0.71x
SGN
Signing Day Sports, Inc.
818.95% 15.957 1.08% 0.21x
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
28.75% -0.075 10.28% 0.93x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
LBAS
Location Based Technologies, Inc.
-- -- -- -- -- --
CTM
Castellum, Inc.
$5.5M $445.3K -11.33% -15.06% 3.05% $957K
INLX
Intellinetics, Inc.
$2.3M -$379.2K -12.47% -15.79% -9.48% $1.1M
INUV
Inuvo, Inc.
$13.4M -$1.7M -31.18% -35.27% -7.4% -$2M
SGN
Signing Day Sports, Inc.
-$31.1K -$868.6K -6026.52% -- -2838.56% -$441.2K
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
$5M -$460.6K -12.59% -17.34% -1.28% $5.9M

Location Based Technologies, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns LBAS or CTM?

    Castellum, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 2.84%. Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Castellum, Inc.'s return on equity of -15.06%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    -- -- --
    CTM
    Castellum, Inc.
    37.56% $0.00 $40.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About LBAS or CTM?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Castellum, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 232.15%. Given that Castellum, Inc. has higher upside potential than Location Based Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Castellum, Inc. is more attractive than Location Based Technologies, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    0 0 0
    CTM
    Castellum, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is LBAS or CTM More Risky?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 37.032% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum, Inc. has a beta of -4.852, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 585.174%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBAS or CTM?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Location Based Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum, Inc. pays out 1.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LBAS or CTM?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Castellum, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.6M. Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Castellum, Inc.'s net income of $415.4K. Notably, Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Castellum, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Location Based Technologies, Inc. is 11.40x versus 1.40x for Castellum, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    11.40x -- -- --
    CTM
    Castellum, Inc.
    1.40x -- $14.6M $415.4K
  • Which has Higher Returns LBAS or INLX?

    Intellinetics, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -9.24%. Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Intellinetics, Inc.'s return on equity of -15.79%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    -- -- --
    INLX
    Intellinetics, Inc.
    56.29% -$0.08 $13.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About LBAS or INLX?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intellinetics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 81.78%. Given that Intellinetics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Location Based Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Intellinetics, Inc. is more attractive than Location Based Technologies, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    0 0 0
    INLX
    Intellinetics, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is LBAS or INLX More Risky?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 37.032% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics, Inc. has a beta of 0.232, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.847%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBAS or INLX?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Location Based Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LBAS or INLX?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intellinetics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4M. Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Intellinetics, Inc.'s net income of -$369.8K. Notably, Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intellinetics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Location Based Technologies, Inc. is 11.40x versus 2.07x for Intellinetics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    11.40x -- -- --
    INLX
    Intellinetics, Inc.
    2.07x 248.75x $4M -$369.8K
  • Which has Higher Returns LBAS or INUV?

    Inuvo, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -7.71%. Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Inuvo, Inc.'s return on equity of -35.27%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    -- -- --
    INUV
    Inuvo, Inc.
    59.47% -$0.12 $14.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About LBAS or INUV?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inuvo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.88 which suggests that it could grow by 338.51%. Given that Inuvo, Inc. has higher upside potential than Location Based Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Inuvo, Inc. is more attractive than Location Based Technologies, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    0 0 0
    INUV
    Inuvo, Inc.
    2 0 0
  • Is LBAS or INUV More Risky?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 37.032% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo, Inc. has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.024%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBAS or INUV?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Location Based Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LBAS or INUV?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inuvo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.6M. Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Inuvo, Inc.'s net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Location Based Technologies, Inc. is 11.40x versus 1.97x for Inuvo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    11.40x -- -- --
    INUV
    Inuvo, Inc.
    1.97x -- $22.6M -$1.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns LBAS or SGN?

    Signing Day Sports, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -1850.98%. Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Signing Day Sports, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    -- -- --
    SGN
    Signing Day Sports, Inc.
    -101.63% -$0.14 $9.5K
  • What do Analysts Say About LBAS or SGN?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Signing Day Sports, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Location Based Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, Inc., analysts believe Location Based Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Signing Day Sports, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    0 0 0
    SGN
    Signing Day Sports, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is LBAS or SGN More Risky?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 37.032% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBAS or SGN?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Location Based Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LBAS or SGN?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Signing Day Sports, Inc. quarterly revenues of $30.6K. Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Signing Day Sports, Inc.'s net income of -$566.4K. Notably, Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Signing Day Sports, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Location Based Technologies, Inc. is 11.40x versus 6.61x for Signing Day Sports, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    11.40x -- -- --
    SGN
    Signing Day Sports, Inc.
    6.61x -- $30.6K -$566.4K
  • Which has Higher Returns LBAS or WYY?

    WidePoint Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -1.55%. Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat WidePoint Corp.'s return on equity of -17.34%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    -- -- --
    WYY
    WidePoint Corp.
    13.98% -$0.06 $17.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About LBAS or WYY?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WidePoint Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.33 which suggests that it could grow by 73.81%. Given that WidePoint Corp. has higher upside potential than Location Based Technologies, Inc., analysts believe WidePoint Corp. is more attractive than Location Based Technologies, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    0 0 0
    WYY
    WidePoint Corp.
    3 0 0
  • Is LBAS or WYY More Risky?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 37.032% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint Corp. has a beta of 1.330, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.007%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBAS or WYY?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Location Based Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LBAS or WYY?

    Location Based Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WidePoint Corp. quarterly revenues of $36.1M. Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than WidePoint Corp.'s net income of -$559.2K. Notably, Location Based Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Location Based Technologies, Inc. is 11.40x versus 0.35x for WidePoint Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LBAS
    Location Based Technologies, Inc.
    11.40x -- -- --
    WYY
    WidePoint Corp.
    0.35x -- $36.1M -$559.2K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?

In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…

Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?

AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?

In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…

Stock Ideas

Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Sell
30
CORT alert for Jan 1

Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. [CORT] is down 50.44% over the past day.

Buy
75
AXSM alert for Jan 1

Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. [AXSM] is up 22.82% over the past day.

Sell
50
NUTX alert for Jan 1

Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is down 9.81% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock