INUV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DHI Group has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Inuvo's net margin of -0.57%. Inuvo's return on equity of -54% beat DHI Group's return on equity of 1.28%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.25%. On the other hand DHI Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 106.42%. Given that DHI Group has higher upside potential than Inuvo, analysts believe DHI Group is more attractive than Inuvo.

Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DHI Group has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.72%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DHI Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DHI Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $22.4M, which are smaller than DHI Group quarterly revenues of $35.3M. Inuvo's net income of -$2M is lower than DHI Group's net income of -$200K. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DHI Group's PE ratio is 61.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.87x versus 0.67x for DHI Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Inuvo's net margin of -6.7%. Inuvo's return on equity of -54% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.25%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 48.91%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Issuer Direct, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Issuer Direct.

Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.119%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $22.4M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. Inuvo's net income of -$2M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 59.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.87x versus 1.15x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NETSOL Technologies has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Inuvo's net margin of 0.49%. Inuvo's return on equity of -54% beat NETSOL Technologies's return on equity of 1.87%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.25%. On the other hand NETSOL Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 196.3%. Given that NETSOL Technologies has higher upside potential than Inuvo, analysts believe NETSOL Technologies is more attractive than Inuvo.

Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NETSOL Technologies has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.321%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NETSOL Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NETSOL Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $22.4M, which are larger than NETSOL Technologies quarterly revenues of $14.6M. Inuvo's net income of -$2M is lower than NETSOL Technologies's net income of $70.8K. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NETSOL Technologies's PE ratio is 40.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.87x versus 0.50x for NETSOL Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SmartRent has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Inuvo's net margin of -24.5%. Inuvo's return on equity of -54% beat SmartRent's return on equity of -7.72%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.25%. On the other hand SmartRent has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.88%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than SmartRent, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than SmartRent.

Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SmartRent has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SmartRent offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SmartRent pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $22.4M, which are smaller than SmartRent quarterly revenues of $40.5M. Inuvo's net income of -$2M is higher than SmartRent's net income of -$9.9M. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SmartRent's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.87x versus 1.67x for SmartRent. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.