Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
71
KNTNF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$21.34
Seasonality move
:
7.07%
Day range:
$20.59 - $21.37
52-week range:
$6.40 - $22.82
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
20.82x
P/S ratio:
9.68x
P/B ratio:
7.54x
Volume:
90.1K
Avg. volume:
189.7K
1-year change:
190.93%
Market cap:
$5.2B
Revenue:
$350.6M
EPS (TTM):
$1.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KNTNF
K92 Mining, Inc.
|
$180.7M | -- | 48.99% | -- | -- |
|
ALGLF
Alma Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.03 | -- | -91.18% | $60.49 |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$60.6M | -- | -51.92% | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KNTNF
K92 Mining, Inc.
|
$21.34 | -- | $5.2B | 20.82x | $0.00 | 0% | 9.68x |
|
ALGLF
Alma Gold, Inc.
|
$0.0700 | -- | $4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
$0.0023 | -- | $469.8K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
$6.25 | -- | $693.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
$35.48 | $60.49 | $3.8B | 250.29x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$0.0053 | -- | $358.9K | 2.02x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KNTNF
K92 Mining, Inc.
|
8.01% | -1.125 | 2.04% | 2.64x |
|
ALGLF
Alma Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -56.005 | -- | 13.93x |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -1.093 | -- | -- |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-87.44% | -10.043 | 2.92% | 0.00x |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
35.61% | 0.964 | 16.75% | 2.67x |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
28.31% | 176.835 | 51.97% | 0.37x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KNTNF
K92 Mining, Inc.
|
$129M | $123.7M | 41.21% | 46% | 69.65% | $2.2M |
|
ALGLF
Alma Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$125.6K | -61.34% | -61.34% | -- | -$174.4K |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$41K | -- | -- | -- | -$42.1K |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-$42.1K | -$3.4M | -3.35% | -5.31% | -- | -$40.1M |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$6.7M | $4.2M | 1.83% | 2.62% | -8.2% | $13.4M |
K92 Mining, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KNTNF or ALGLF?
Alma Gold, Inc. has a net margin of 48.25% compared to K92 Mining, Inc.'s net margin of --. K92 Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 46% beat Alma Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -61.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.72.68% $0.35 $748.6M ALGLFAlma Gold, Inc.-- -$0.00 $2M -
What do Analysts Say About KNTNF or ALGLF?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Alma Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that K92 Mining, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alma Gold, Inc., analysts believe K92 Mining, Inc. is more attractive than Alma Gold, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.0 0 0 ALGLFAlma Gold, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is KNTNF or ALGLF More Risky?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.838% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alma Gold, Inc. has a beta of 225.355, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22435.506%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KNTNF or ALGLF?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alma Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. K92 Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alma Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KNTNF or ALGLF?
K92 Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $177.5M, which are larger than Alma Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. K92 Mining, Inc.'s net income of $85.7M is higher than Alma Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$128.8K. Notably, K92 Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.82x while Alma Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K92 Mining, Inc. is 9.68x versus -- for Alma Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.9.68x 20.82x $177.5M $85.7M ALGLFAlma Gold, Inc.-- -- -- -$128.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns KNTNF or JSHG?
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 48.25% compared to K92 Mining, Inc.'s net margin of --. K92 Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 46% beat Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.72.68% $0.35 $748.6M JSHGJoshua Gold Resources, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KNTNF or JSHG?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that K92 Mining, Inc. has higher upside potential than Joshua Gold Resources, Inc., analysts believe K92 Mining, Inc. is more attractive than Joshua Gold Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.0 0 0 JSHGJoshua Gold Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is KNTNF or JSHG More Risky?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.838% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. has a beta of -1.203, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 220.254%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KNTNF or JSHG?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. K92 Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KNTNF or JSHG?
K92 Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $177.5M, which are larger than Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. K92 Mining, Inc.'s net income of $85.7M is higher than Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, K92 Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.82x while Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K92 Mining, Inc. is 9.68x versus -- for Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.9.68x 20.82x $177.5M $85.7M JSHGJoshua Gold Resources, Inc.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KNTNF or RBTK?
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 48.25% compared to K92 Mining, Inc.'s net margin of --. K92 Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 46% beat Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.72.68% $0.35 $748.6M RBTKZhen Ding Resources, Inc.-- -$0.00 -$7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About KNTNF or RBTK?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that K92 Mining, Inc. has higher upside potential than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc., analysts believe K92 Mining, Inc. is more attractive than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.0 0 0 RBTKZhen Ding Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is KNTNF or RBTK More Risky?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.838% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a beta of -0.953, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 195.315%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KNTNF or RBTK?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. K92 Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KNTNF or RBTK?
K92 Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $177.5M, which are larger than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. K92 Mining, Inc.'s net income of $85.7M is higher than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$162.8K. Notably, K92 Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.82x while Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K92 Mining, Inc. is 9.68x versus -- for Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.9.68x 20.82x $177.5M $85.7M RBTKZhen Ding Resources, Inc.-- -- -- -$162.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns KNTNF or SA?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of 48.25% compared to K92 Mining, Inc.'s net margin of --. K92 Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 46% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.72.68% $0.35 $748.6M SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- -$0.23 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About KNTNF or SA?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $60.49 which suggests that it could grow by 70.49%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than K92 Mining, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than K92 Mining, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.0 0 0 SASeabridge Gold, Inc.3 0 0 -
Is KNTNF or SA More Risky?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.838% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.253%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KNTNF or SA?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. K92 Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KNTNF or SA?
K92 Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $177.5M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. K92 Mining, Inc.'s net income of $85.7M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, K92 Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.82x while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K92 Mining, Inc. is 9.68x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.9.68x 20.82x $177.5M $85.7M SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- 250.29x -- -$23.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns KNTNF or VITFF?
Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of 48.25% compared to K92 Mining, Inc.'s net margin of -10.81%. K92 Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 46% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.72.68% $0.35 $748.6M VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.10.82% -$0.10 $608M -
What do Analysts Say About KNTNF or VITFF?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that K92 Mining, Inc. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe K92 Mining, Inc. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.0 0 0 VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.0 0 0 -
Is KNTNF or VITFF More Risky?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.838% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 19.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1824.925%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KNTNF or VITFF?
K92 Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. K92 Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KNTNF or VITFF?
K92 Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $177.5M, which are larger than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. K92 Mining, Inc.'s net income of $85.7M is higher than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, K92 Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.82x while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K92 Mining, Inc. is 9.68x versus 0.00x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KNTNFK92 Mining, Inc.9.68x 20.82x $177.5M $85.7M VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.0.00x 2.02x $61.5M -$6.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
