KNTNF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty has a net margin of 46.16% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of -95.17%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 28.36% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -0.63%.

K92 Mining has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.11 which suggests that it could grow by 107.33%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than K92 Mining, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than K92 Mining.

K92 Mining has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 8.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

K92 Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. K92 Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

K92 Mining quarterly revenues are $120.3M, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $3.4M. K92 Mining's net income of $55.5M is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, K92 Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.93x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K92 Mining is 6.30x versus 23.72x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 46.16% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of -24.56%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 28.36% beat McEwen Mining's return on equity of -8.85%.

K92 Mining has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand McEwen Mining has an analysts' consensus of $15.06 which suggests that it could grow by 97.15%. Given that McEwen Mining has higher upside potential than K92 Mining, analysts believe McEwen Mining is more attractive than K92 Mining.

K92 Mining has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 8.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen Mining has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.055%.

K92 Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. K92 Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

K92 Mining quarterly revenues are $120.3M, which are larger than McEwen Mining quarterly revenues of $33.5M. K92 Mining's net income of $55.5M is higher than McEwen Mining's net income of -$8.2M. Notably, K92 Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.93x while McEwen Mining's PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K92 Mining is 6.30x versus 2.23x for McEwen Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rise Gold has a net margin of 46.16% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of --. K92 Mining's return on equity of 28.36% beat Rise Gold's return on equity of --.

K92 Mining has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rise Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that K92 Mining has higher upside potential than Rise Gold, analysts believe K92 Mining is more attractive than Rise Gold.

K92 Mining has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 8.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rise Gold has a beta of -1.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 240.197%.

K92 Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rise Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. K92 Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rise Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

K92 Mining quarterly revenues are $120.3M, which are larger than Rise Gold quarterly revenues of --. K92 Mining's net income of $55.5M is higher than Rise Gold's net income of -$686.3K. Notably, K92 Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.93x while Rise Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K92 Mining is 6.30x versus -- for Rise Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of 46.16% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of --. K92 Mining's return on equity of 28.36% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

K92 Mining has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of $39.71 which suggests that it could grow by 221.28%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than K92 Mining, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than K92 Mining.

K92 Mining has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 8.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.332%.

K92 Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. K92 Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

K92 Mining quarterly revenues are $120.3M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. K92 Mining's net income of $55.5M is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of -$20.2M. Notably, K92 Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.93x while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K92 Mining is 6.30x versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.