KNTNF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of 48.25% compared to K92 Mining, Inc.'s net margin of -27.31%. K92 Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 46% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

K92 Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.11 which suggests that it could grow by 22.47%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than K92 Mining, Inc., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than K92 Mining, Inc..

K92 Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.519, which suggesting that the stock is 48.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

K92 Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. K92 Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

K92 Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $177.5M, which are larger than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. K92 Mining, Inc.'s net income of $85.7M is higher than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, K92 Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K92 Mining, Inc. is 7.62x versus 49.16x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen, Inc. has a net margin of 48.25% compared to K92 Mining, Inc.'s net margin of -0.91%. K92 Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 46% beat McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43%.

K92 Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand McEwen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.60 which suggests that it could grow by 15.31%. Given that McEwen, Inc. has higher upside potential than K92 Mining, Inc., analysts believe McEwen, Inc. is more attractive than K92 Mining, Inc..

K92 Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.519, which suggesting that the stock is 48.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.536%.

K92 Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. K92 Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

K92 Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $177.5M, which are larger than McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. K92 Mining, Inc.'s net income of $85.7M is higher than McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K. Notably, K92 Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while McEwen, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K92 Mining, Inc. is 7.62x versus 6.31x for McEwen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of 48.25% compared to K92 Mining, Inc.'s net margin of --. K92 Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 46% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.

K92 Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.78 which suggests that it could grow by 80.47%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than K92 Mining, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than K92 Mining, Inc..

K92 Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.519, which suggesting that the stock is 48.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.657%.

K92 Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. K92 Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

K92 Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $177.5M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. K92 Mining, Inc.'s net income of $85.7M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, K92 Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K92 Mining, Inc. is 7.62x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of 48.25% compared to K92 Mining, Inc.'s net margin of -10.81%. K92 Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 46% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.

K92 Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that K92 Mining, Inc. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe K92 Mining, Inc. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..

K92 Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.519, which suggesting that the stock is 48.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 19.929, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1892.865%.

K92 Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. K92 Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

K92 Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $177.5M, which are larger than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. K92 Mining, Inc.'s net income of $85.7M is higher than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, K92 Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for K92 Mining, Inc. is 7.62x versus 0.06x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.