JXHLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fuji Oil has a net margin of 2.58% compared to ENEOS Holdings's net margin of 2.16%. ENEOS Holdings's return on equity of 8.23% beat Fuji Oil's return on equity of 19.41%.

ENEOS Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fuji Oil has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ENEOS Holdings has higher upside potential than Fuji Oil, analysts believe ENEOS Holdings is more attractive than Fuji Oil.

ENEOS Holdings has a beta of 0.434, which suggesting that the stock is 56.574% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuji Oil has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ENEOS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Fuji Oil offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. ENEOS Holdings pays 23.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Fuji Oil pays out 4.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ENEOS Holdings quarterly revenues are $20.3B, which are larger than Fuji Oil quarterly revenues of $1.5B. ENEOS Holdings's net income of $523.7M is higher than Fuji Oil's net income of $32.7M. Notably, ENEOS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.11x while Fuji Oil's PE ratio is 9.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ENEOS Holdings is 0.19x versus 0.20x for Fuji Oil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Idemitsu Kosan has a net margin of 2.58% compared to ENEOS Holdings's net margin of 4.2%. ENEOS Holdings's return on equity of 8.23% beat Idemitsu Kosan's return on equity of 13.14%.

ENEOS Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Idemitsu Kosan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ENEOS Holdings has higher upside potential than Idemitsu Kosan, analysts believe ENEOS Holdings is more attractive than Idemitsu Kosan.

ENEOS Holdings has a beta of 0.434, which suggesting that the stock is 56.574% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Idemitsu Kosan has a beta of 0.049, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.069%.

ENEOS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Idemitsu Kosan offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. ENEOS Holdings pays 23.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Idemitsu Kosan pays out 17.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ENEOS Holdings quarterly revenues are $20.3B, which are larger than Idemitsu Kosan quarterly revenues of $14.5B. ENEOS Holdings's net income of $523.7M is lower than Idemitsu Kosan's net income of $609.5M. Notably, ENEOS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.11x while Idemitsu Kosan's PE ratio is 4.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ENEOS Holdings is 0.19x versus 0.14x for Idemitsu Kosan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inpex has a net margin of 2.58% compared to ENEOS Holdings's net margin of 13.8%. ENEOS Holdings's return on equity of 8.23% beat Inpex's return on equity of 7.98%.

ENEOS Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inpex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ENEOS Holdings has higher upside potential than Inpex, analysts believe ENEOS Holdings is more attractive than Inpex.

ENEOS Holdings has a beta of 0.434, which suggesting that the stock is 56.574% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inpex has a beta of 0.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.366%.

ENEOS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Inpex offers a yield of 4.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. ENEOS Holdings pays 23.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Inpex pays out 24.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ENEOS Holdings quarterly revenues are $20.3B, which are larger than Inpex quarterly revenues of $3.7B. ENEOS Holdings's net income of $523.7M is higher than Inpex's net income of $517.3M. Notably, ENEOS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.11x while Inpex's PE ratio is 6.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ENEOS Holdings is 0.19x versus 1.03x for Inpex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Japan Petroleum Exploration has a net margin of 2.58% compared to ENEOS Holdings's net margin of 12.85%. ENEOS Holdings's return on equity of 8.23% beat Japan Petroleum Exploration's return on equity of 10.79%.

ENEOS Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Japan Petroleum Exploration has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ENEOS Holdings has higher upside potential than Japan Petroleum Exploration, analysts believe ENEOS Holdings is more attractive than Japan Petroleum Exploration.

ENEOS Holdings has a beta of 0.434, which suggesting that the stock is 56.574% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Petroleum Exploration has a beta of -0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.786%.

ENEOS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Japan Petroleum Exploration offers a yield of 5.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. ENEOS Holdings pays 23.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Petroleum Exploration pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ENEOS Holdings quarterly revenues are $20.3B, which are larger than Japan Petroleum Exploration quarterly revenues of $573.9M. ENEOS Holdings's net income of $523.7M is higher than Japan Petroleum Exploration's net income of $73.7M. Notably, ENEOS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.11x while Japan Petroleum Exploration's PE ratio is 5.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ENEOS Holdings is 0.19x versus 0.80x for Japan Petroleum Exploration. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.