Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
40
CEHCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$36.55
Seasonality move
:
0%
Day range:
$36.55 - $36.55
52-week range:
$18.28 - $36.55
Dividend yield:
4.41%
P/E ratio:
15.20x
P/S ratio:
0.28x
P/B ratio:
1.50x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
100%
Market cap:
$6B
Revenue:
$18.4B
EPS (TTM):
$2.40
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEHCF
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FJOLF
Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IDKOY
Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IPXHY
INPEX Corp.
|
$2.6B | -- | -3.33% | -- | -- |
|
JPTXF
Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JXHGF
ENEOS Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEHCF
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$36.55 | -- | $6B | 15.20x | $1.01 | 4.41% | 0.28x |
|
FJOLF
Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/
|
$3.02 | -- | $233.3M | 7.35x | $0.08 | 2.65% | 0.06x |
|
IDKOY
Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.
|
$14.58 | -- | $8.9B | 33.83x | $0.25 | 0% | 0.16x |
|
IPXHY
INPEX Corp.
|
$20.49 | -- | $24.2B | 8.56x | $0.29 | 0% | 1.80x |
|
JPTXF
Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.
|
$8.85 | -- | $2.3B | 3.91x | $0.14 | 3.8% | 0.91x |
|
JXHGF
ENEOS Holdings, Inc.
|
$6.76 | -- | $18.2B | 12.69x | $0.11 | 2.98% | 0.24x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEHCF
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
48.97% | 1.901 | 56.08% | 0.53x |
|
FJOLF
Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/
|
73.67% | 0.633 | 104.38% | 0.27x |
|
IDKOY
Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.
|
41.5% | -0.276 | 94.94% | 0.46x |
|
IPXHY
INPEX Corp.
|
20.6% | 0.154 | 34.42% | 0.60x |
|
JPTXF
Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.
|
1.34% | -1.309 | 2.5% | 5.65x |
|
JXHGF
ENEOS Holdings, Inc.
|
45.94% | -0.243 | 98.3% | 0.84x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEHCF
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$674.5M | $354.4M | 4.4% | 8.47% | 7.63% | -- |
|
FJOLF
Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/
|
-$26.9M | -$33.3M | -3.65% | -11.3% | -4.38% | -- |
|
IDKOY
Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.
|
$1.2B | $317.8M | 1.29% | 2.17% | 2.39% | -- |
|
IPXHY
INPEX Corp.
|
$1.8B | $1.6B | 7.4% | 9.13% | 50.48% | $946.6M |
|
JPTXF
Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.
|
$120.2M | $59.7M | 15.63% | 15.89% | 10.33% | -- |
|
JXHGF
ENEOS Holdings, Inc.
|
$2B | $630.1M | 0.87% | 1.58% | 3.29% | $607.2M |
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CEHCF or FJOLF?
Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/ has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of -3.19%. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.47% beat Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/'s return on equity of -11.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.14.52% $1.06 $8.7B FJOLFFuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/-3.54% -$0.32 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About CEHCF or FJOLF?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/ has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/, analysts believe Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 FJOLFFuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/0 0 0 -
Is CEHCF or FJOLF More Risky?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/ has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEHCF or FJOLF?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/ offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 49.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/ pays out 20.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEHCF or FJOLF?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/ quarterly revenues of $760M. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of $194.4M is higher than Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/'s net income of -$24.3M. Notably, Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.20x while Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/'s PE ratio is 7.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. is 0.28x versus 0.06x for Fuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0.28x 15.20x $4.6B $194.4M FJOLFFuji Oil Co., Ltd. /5017/0.06x 7.35x $760M -$24.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns CEHCF or IDKOY?
Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 1.55%. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.47% beat Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.14.52% $1.06 $8.7B IDKOYIdemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.9.14% $0.34 $20.1B -
What do Analysts Say About CEHCF or IDKOY?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd., analysts believe Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 IDKOYIdemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CEHCF or IDKOY More Risky?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.205, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.512%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEHCF or IDKOY?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 49.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. pays out 32.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEHCF or IDKOY?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are smaller than Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of $194.4M is lower than Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.'s net income of $206.8M. Notably, Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.20x while Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 33.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. is 0.28x versus 0.16x for Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0.28x 15.20x $4.6B $194.4M IDKOYIdemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.0.16x 33.83x $13.3B $206.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns CEHCF or IPXHY?
INPEX Corp. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 15.31%. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.47% beat INPEX Corp.'s return on equity of 9.13%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.14.52% $1.06 $8.7B IPXHYINPEX Corp.55.42% $0.40 $39.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CEHCF or IPXHY?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand INPEX Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than INPEX Corp., analysts believe Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than INPEX Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 IPXHYINPEX Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CEHCF or IPXHY More Risky?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison INPEX Corp. has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.126%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEHCF or IPXHY?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. INPEX Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 49.05% of its earnings as a dividend. INPEX Corp. pays out 18.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEHCF or IPXHY?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than INPEX Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of $194.4M is lower than INPEX Corp.'s net income of $489.6M. Notably, Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.20x while INPEX Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. is 0.28x versus 1.80x for INPEX Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0.28x 15.20x $4.6B $194.4M IPXHYINPEX Corp.1.80x 8.56x $3.2B $489.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns CEHCF or JPTXF?
Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 13.66%. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.47% beat Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.14.52% $1.06 $8.7B JPTXFJapan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.20.79% $0.30 $3.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CEHCF or JPTXF?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd., analysts believe Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 JPTXFJapan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CEHCF or JPTXF More Risky?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.197, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.736%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEHCF or JPTXF?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 49.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd. pays out 17.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEHCF or JPTXF?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $578.4M. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of $194.4M is higher than Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.'s net income of $79M. Notably, Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.20x while Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. is 0.28x versus 0.91x for Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0.28x 15.20x $4.6B $194.4M JPTXFJapan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.0.91x 3.91x $578.4M $79M
-
Which has Higher Returns CEHCF or JXHGF?
ENEOS Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 3.08%. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.47% beat ENEOS Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.58%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.14.52% $1.06 $8.7B JXHGFENEOS Holdings, Inc.10.68% $0.20 $41.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CEHCF or JXHGF?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ENEOS Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than ENEOS Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than ENEOS Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 JXHGFENEOS Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CEHCF or JXHGF More Risky?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ENEOS Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.227, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.693%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEHCF or JXHGF?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. ENEOS Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 49.05% of its earnings as a dividend. ENEOS Holdings, Inc. pays out 32.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEHCF or JXHGF?
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are smaller than ENEOS Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $19.1B. Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of $194.4M is lower than ENEOS Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $589M. Notably, Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.20x while ENEOS Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. is 0.28x versus 0.24x for ENEOS Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEHCFCosmo Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0.28x 15.20x $4.6B $194.4M JXHGFENEOS Holdings, Inc.0.24x 12.69x $19.1B $589M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
