Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Buy
61
JINFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$19.49
Seasonality move
:
30.97%
Day range:
$19.47 - $20.00
52-week range:
$4.80 - $21.92
Dividend yield:
0.26%
P/E ratio:
18.90x
P/S ratio:
6.34x
P/B ratio:
3.55x
Volume:
1.3K
Avg. volume:
4.3K
1-year change:
309.41%
Market cap:
$7.7B
Revenue:
$756.6M
EPS (TTM):
$1.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JINFF
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENRT
Enertopia
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRO
Brazil Potash Corp
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$4M | -$0.01 | 1.34% | -100% | $5.11 |
|
LOOP
Loop Industries, Inc.
|
$775K | -$0.05 | 1390.39% | -31.17% | $4.55 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JINFF
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.
|
$19.49 | -- | $7.7B | 18.90x | $0.08 | 0.26% | 6.34x |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
$1.66 | -- | $22.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ENRT
Enertopia
|
$0.1000 | -- | $775.8K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 21,678.81x |
|
GRO
Brazil Potash Corp
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$4.05 | $5.11 | $904.7M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 47.74x |
|
LOOP
Loop Industries, Inc.
|
$0.98 | $4.55 | $47M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.19x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JINFF
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.
|
21.17% | 0.926 | 8.3% | 1.39x |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-- | 1.703 | -- | 43.32x |
|
ENRT
Enertopia
|
-- | -0.435 | -- | -- |
|
GRO
Brazil Potash Corp
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
8.34% | 1.760 | 7.69% | 1.57x |
|
LOOP
Loop Industries, Inc.
|
160.84% | 2.707 | 20.27% | 2.03x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JINFF
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.
|
$194.5M | $174.1M | 15.66% | 21.53% | 50.46% | $217.7M |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-$700 | -$313.5K | -19.82% | -19.82% | -- | -$934.5K |
|
ENRT
Enertopia
|
-- | -$113.8K | -- | -- | -- | -$83.4K |
|
GRO
Brazil Potash Corp
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$2.8M | $572K | -1.05% | -1.15% | 13.79% | $1.3M |
|
LOOP
Loop Industries, Inc.
|
-$96K | -$2.8M | -136% | -1369.4% | -1139.29% | -$2.5M |
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns JINFF or AUST?
Austin Gold Corp. has a net margin of 41.24% compared to China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 21.53% beat Austin Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -19.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.56.37% $0.36 $2.8B AUSTAustin Gold Corp.-- -$0.02 $8.8M -
What do Analysts Say About JINFF or AUST?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Austin Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 80.84%. Given that Austin Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Austin Gold Corp. is more attractive than China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 AUSTAustin Gold Corp.0 0 0 -
Is JINFF or AUST More Risky?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Austin Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JINFF or AUST?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Austin Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. pays 32.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Austin Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JINFF or AUST?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $345M, which are larger than Austin Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $142.3M is higher than Austin Gold Corp.'s net income of -$270.8K. Notably, China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.90x while Austin Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. is 6.34x versus -- for Austin Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.6.34x 18.90x $345M $142.3M AUSTAustin Gold Corp.-- -- -- -$270.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns JINFF or ENRT?
Enertopia has a net margin of 41.24% compared to China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 21.53% beat Enertopia's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.56.37% $0.36 $2.8B ENRTEnertopia-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JINFF or ENRT?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enertopia has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10%. Given that Enertopia has higher upside potential than China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Enertopia is more attractive than China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 ENRTEnertopia0 0 0 -
Is JINFF or ENRT More Risky?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enertopia has a beta of -0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 153.482%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JINFF or ENRT?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Enertopia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. pays 32.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Enertopia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JINFF or ENRT?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $345M, which are larger than Enertopia quarterly revenues of --. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $142.3M is higher than Enertopia's net income of -$153.7K. Notably, China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.90x while Enertopia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. is 6.34x versus 21,678.81x for Enertopia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.6.34x 18.90x $345M $142.3M ENRTEnertopia21,678.81x -- -- -$153.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns JINFF or GRO?
Brazil Potash Corp has a net margin of 41.24% compared to China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 21.53% beat Brazil Potash Corp's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.56.37% $0.36 $2.8B GROBrazil Potash Corp-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JINFF or GRO?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Brazil Potash Corp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Brazil Potash Corp, analysts believe China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than Brazil Potash Corp.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 GROBrazil Potash Corp0 0 0 -
Is JINFF or GRO More Risky?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brazil Potash Corp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JINFF or GRO?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Brazil Potash Corp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. pays 32.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Brazil Potash Corp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JINFF or GRO?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $345M, which are larger than Brazil Potash Corp quarterly revenues of --. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $142.3M is higher than Brazil Potash Corp's net income of --. Notably, China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.90x while Brazil Potash Corp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. is 6.34x versus -- for Brazil Potash Corp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.6.34x 18.90x $345M $142.3M GROBrazil Potash Corp-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns JINFF or GROY?
Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of 41.24% compared to China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of -27.31%. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 21.53% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.56.37% $0.36 $2.8B GROYGold Royalty Corp.68.47% -$0.01 $610.9M -
What do Analysts Say About JINFF or GROY?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.11 which suggests that it could grow by 26.1%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 GROYGold Royalty Corp.3 0 0 -
Is JINFF or GROY More Risky?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JINFF or GROY?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. pays 32.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JINFF or GROY?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $345M, which are larger than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $142.3M is higher than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.90x while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. is 6.34x versus 47.74x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.6.34x 18.90x $345M $142.3M GROYGold Royalty Corp.47.74x -- $4.1M -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns JINFF or LOOP?
Loop Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 41.24% compared to China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of -1367.86%. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 21.53% beat Loop Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -1369.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.56.37% $0.36 $2.8B LOOPLoop Industries, Inc.60.32% -$0.07 $9M -
What do Analysts Say About JINFF or LOOP?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Loop Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.55 which suggests that it could grow by 365.33%. Given that Loop Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Loop Industries, Inc. is more attractive than China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 LOOPLoop Industries, Inc.2 0 0 -
Is JINFF or LOOP More Risky?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loop Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.591, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.14%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JINFF or LOOP?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Loop Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. pays 32.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Loop Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JINFF or LOOP?
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $345M, which are larger than Loop Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $142.3M is higher than Loop Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$3.2M. Notably, China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.90x while Loop Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. is 6.34x versus 4.19x for Loop Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JINFFChina Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.6.34x 18.90x $345M $142.3M LOOPLoop Industries, Inc.4.19x -- -- -$3.2M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 27.67% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 18.01% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 18.81% over the past day.
