JGSHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cebu Air has a net margin of 3.43% compared to JG Summit Holdings's net margin of -0.75%. JG Summit Holdings's return on equity of 4.95% beat Cebu Air's return on equity of 104.15%.

JG Summit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cebu Air has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that JG Summit Holdings has higher upside potential than Cebu Air, analysts believe JG Summit Holdings is more attractive than Cebu Air.

JG Summit Holdings has a beta of 0.184, which suggesting that the stock is 81.622% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cebu Air has a beta of 0.619, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.08%.

JG Summit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Cebu Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JG Summit Holdings pays 15.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Cebu Air pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JG Summit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JG Summit Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Cebu Air quarterly revenues of $403.4M. JG Summit Holdings's net income of $53.4M is higher than Cebu Air's net income of -$3M. Notably, JG Summit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.04x while Cebu Air's PE ratio is 0.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JG Summit Holdings is 0.74x versus 0.01x for Cebu Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DMCI Holdings has a net margin of 3.43% compared to JG Summit Holdings's net margin of 18.3%. JG Summit Holdings's return on equity of 4.95% beat DMCI Holdings's return on equity of 14.36%.

JG Summit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DMCI Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that JG Summit Holdings has higher upside potential than DMCI Holdings, analysts believe JG Summit Holdings is more attractive than DMCI Holdings.

JG Summit Holdings has a beta of 0.184, which suggesting that the stock is 81.622% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DMCI Holdings has a beta of 0.849, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.112%.

JG Summit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. DMCI Holdings offers a yield of 9.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. JG Summit Holdings pays 15.09% of its earnings as a dividend. DMCI Holdings pays out 77.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JG Summit Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than DMCI Holdings quarterly revenues of $381.7M. JG Summit Holdings's net income of $53.4M is lower than DMCI Holdings's net income of $69.9M. Notably, JG Summit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.04x while DMCI Holdings's PE ratio is 7.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JG Summit Holdings is 0.74x versus 1.47x for DMCI Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Container Terminal Services has a net margin of 3.43% compared to JG Summit Holdings's net margin of 27.83%. JG Summit Holdings's return on equity of 4.95% beat International Container Terminal Services's return on equity of 39.03%.

JG Summit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand International Container Terminal Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that JG Summit Holdings has higher upside potential than International Container Terminal Services, analysts believe JG Summit Holdings is more attractive than International Container Terminal Services.

JG Summit Holdings has a beta of 0.184, which suggesting that the stock is 81.622% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Container Terminal Services has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

JG Summit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. International Container Terminal Services offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. JG Summit Holdings pays 15.09% of its earnings as a dividend. International Container Terminal Services pays out 83.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JG Summit Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than International Container Terminal Services quarterly revenues of $761.9M. JG Summit Holdings's net income of $53.4M is lower than International Container Terminal Services's net income of $212M. Notably, JG Summit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.04x while International Container Terminal Services's PE ratio is 23.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JG Summit Holdings is 0.74x versus 5.42x for International Container Terminal Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

San Miguel has a net margin of 3.43% compared to JG Summit Holdings's net margin of 3.5%. JG Summit Holdings's return on equity of 4.95% beat San Miguel's return on equity of 0.77%.

JG Summit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand San Miguel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that JG Summit Holdings has higher upside potential than San Miguel, analysts believe JG Summit Holdings is more attractive than San Miguel.

JG Summit Holdings has a beta of 0.184, which suggesting that the stock is 81.622% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison San Miguel has a beta of 0.703, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.677%.

JG Summit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. San Miguel offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. JG Summit Holdings pays 15.09% of its earnings as a dividend. San Miguel pays out 4567.17% of its earnings as a dividend. JG Summit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but San Miguel's is not.

JG Summit Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than San Miguel quarterly revenues of $6.8B. JG Summit Holdings's net income of $53.4M is lower than San Miguel's net income of $239M. Notably, JG Summit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.04x while San Miguel's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JG Summit Holdings is 0.74x versus 0.13x for San Miguel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.