DMCHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cebu Air has a net margin of 18.3% compared to DMCI Holdings's net margin of -0.75%. DMCI Holdings's return on equity of 14.36% beat Cebu Air's return on equity of 104.15%.

DMCI Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cebu Air has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DMCI Holdings has higher upside potential than Cebu Air, analysts believe DMCI Holdings is more attractive than Cebu Air.

DMCI Holdings has a beta of 0.849, which suggesting that the stock is 15.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cebu Air has a beta of 0.619, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.08%.

DMCI Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.94%. Cebu Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DMCI Holdings pays 77.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Cebu Air pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. DMCI Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DMCI Holdings quarterly revenues are $381.7M, which are smaller than Cebu Air quarterly revenues of $403.4M. DMCI Holdings's net income of $69.9M is higher than Cebu Air's net income of -$3M. Notably, DMCI Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while Cebu Air's PE ratio is 0.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DMCI Holdings is 1.47x versus 0.01x for Cebu Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Container Terminal Services has a net margin of 18.3% compared to DMCI Holdings's net margin of 27.83%. DMCI Holdings's return on equity of 14.36% beat International Container Terminal Services's return on equity of 39.03%.

DMCI Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand International Container Terminal Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DMCI Holdings has higher upside potential than International Container Terminal Services, analysts believe DMCI Holdings is more attractive than International Container Terminal Services.

DMCI Holdings has a beta of 0.849, which suggesting that the stock is 15.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Container Terminal Services has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DMCI Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.94%. International Container Terminal Services offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. DMCI Holdings pays 77.34% of its earnings as a dividend. International Container Terminal Services pays out 83.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DMCI Holdings quarterly revenues are $381.7M, which are smaller than International Container Terminal Services quarterly revenues of $761.9M. DMCI Holdings's net income of $69.9M is lower than International Container Terminal Services's net income of $212M. Notably, DMCI Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while International Container Terminal Services's PE ratio is 23.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DMCI Holdings is 1.47x versus 5.42x for International Container Terminal Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JG Summit Holdings has a net margin of 18.3% compared to DMCI Holdings's net margin of 3.43%. DMCI Holdings's return on equity of 14.36% beat JG Summit Holdings's return on equity of 4.95%.

DMCI Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JG Summit Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DMCI Holdings has higher upside potential than JG Summit Holdings, analysts believe DMCI Holdings is more attractive than JG Summit Holdings.

DMCI Holdings has a beta of 0.849, which suggesting that the stock is 15.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JG Summit Holdings has a beta of 0.184, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.622%.

DMCI Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.94%. JG Summit Holdings offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. DMCI Holdings pays 77.34% of its earnings as a dividend. JG Summit Holdings pays out 15.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DMCI Holdings quarterly revenues are $381.7M, which are smaller than JG Summit Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6B. DMCI Holdings's net income of $69.9M is higher than JG Summit Holdings's net income of $53.4M. Notably, DMCI Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while JG Summit Holdings's PE ratio is 12.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DMCI Holdings is 1.47x versus 0.74x for JG Summit Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

San Miguel has a net margin of 18.3% compared to DMCI Holdings's net margin of 3.5%. DMCI Holdings's return on equity of 14.36% beat San Miguel's return on equity of 0.77%.

DMCI Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand San Miguel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DMCI Holdings has higher upside potential than San Miguel, analysts believe DMCI Holdings is more attractive than San Miguel.

DMCI Holdings has a beta of 0.849, which suggesting that the stock is 15.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison San Miguel has a beta of 0.703, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.677%.

DMCI Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.94%. San Miguel offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. DMCI Holdings pays 77.34% of its earnings as a dividend. San Miguel pays out 4567.17% of its earnings as a dividend. DMCI Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but San Miguel's is not.

DMCI Holdings quarterly revenues are $381.7M, which are smaller than San Miguel quarterly revenues of $6.8B. DMCI Holdings's net income of $69.9M is lower than San Miguel's net income of $239M. Notably, DMCI Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while San Miguel's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DMCI Holdings is 1.47x versus 0.13x for San Miguel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.