JDCMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 2.13% compared to JD.com, Inc.'s net margin of 6.1%. JD.com, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.51% beat China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53%.

JD.com, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Automotive Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 73.61%. Given that China Automotive Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than JD.com, Inc., analysts believe China Automotive Systems, Inc. is more attractive than JD.com, Inc..

JD.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.385, which suggesting that the stock is 61.455% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.83%.

JD.com, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. China Automotive Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. JD.com, Inc. pays 26.65% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com, Inc. quarterly revenues are $41.8B, which are larger than China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $193.2M. JD.com, Inc.'s net income of $891.5M is higher than China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M. Notably, JD.com, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.19x while China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com, Inc. is 0.25x versus 0.18x for China Automotive Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H World Group Ltd. has a net margin of 2.13% compared to JD.com, Inc.'s net margin of 21.15%. JD.com, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.51% beat H World Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 33.36%.

JD.com, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand H World Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $51.13 which suggests that it could grow by 5.89%. Given that H World Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than JD.com, Inc., analysts believe H World Group Ltd. is more attractive than JD.com, Inc..

JD.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.385, which suggesting that the stock is 61.455% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.874%.

JD.com, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. H World Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. JD.com, Inc. pays 26.65% of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group Ltd. pays out 120.75% of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but H World Group Ltd.'s is not.

JD.com, Inc. quarterly revenues are $41.8B, which are larger than H World Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $972.6M. JD.com, Inc.'s net income of $891.5M is higher than H World Group Ltd.'s net income of $205.7M. Notably, JD.com, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.19x while H World Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 27.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com, Inc. is 0.25x versus 4.45x for H World Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a net margin of 2.13% compared to JD.com, Inc.'s net margin of -13.73%. JD.com, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.51% beat Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.54%.

JD.com, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 467.99%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than JD.com, Inc., analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. is more attractive than JD.com, Inc..

JD.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.385, which suggesting that the stock is 61.455% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.766%.

JD.com, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com, Inc. pays 26.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com, Inc. quarterly revenues are $41.8B, which are larger than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.9M. JD.com, Inc.'s net income of $891.5M is higher than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, JD.com, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.19x while Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com, Inc. is 0.25x versus 0.60x for Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.