IGIFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AVX has a net margin of 33.35% compared to IGM Financial, Inc.'s net margin of --. IGM Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.2% beat AVX's return on equity of --.

IGM Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AVX has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IGM Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than AVX, analysts believe IGM Financial, Inc. is more attractive than AVX.

IGM Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.072, which suggesting that the stock is 7.187% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AVX has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

IGM Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. AVX offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IGM Financial, Inc. pays 48.33% of its earnings as a dividend. AVX pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. IGM Financial, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IGM Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $697.9M, which are larger than AVX quarterly revenues of --. IGM Financial, Inc.'s net income of $232.7M is higher than AVX's net income of --. Notably, IGM Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.22x while AVX's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IGM Financial, Inc. is 4.69x versus -- for AVX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

California First Leasing Corp. has a net margin of 33.35% compared to IGM Financial, Inc.'s net margin of --. IGM Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.2% beat California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72%.

IGM Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand California First Leasing Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IGM Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe IGM Financial, Inc. is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..

IGM Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.072, which suggesting that the stock is 7.187% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.161, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.913%.

IGM Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. California First Leasing Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. IGM Financial, Inc. pays 48.33% of its earnings as a dividend. California First Leasing Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. IGM Financial, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IGM Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $697.9M, which are larger than California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues of --. IGM Financial, Inc.'s net income of $232.7M is higher than California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, IGM Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.22x while California First Leasing Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IGM Financial, Inc. is 4.69x versus 25.73x for California First Leasing Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a net margin of 33.35% compared to IGM Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 21.69%. IGM Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.2% beat Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 27.14%.

IGM Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has an analysts' consensus of $72.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.24%. Given that Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has higher upside potential than IGM Financial, Inc., analysts believe Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is more attractive than IGM Financial, Inc..

IGM Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.072, which suggesting that the stock is 7.187% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.929%.

IGM Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. IGM Financial, Inc. pays 48.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays out 83.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IGM Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $697.9M, which are larger than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues of $141.6M. IGM Financial, Inc.'s net income of $232.7M is higher than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $30.7M. Notably, IGM Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.22x while Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s PE ratio is 22.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IGM Financial, Inc. is 4.69x versus 6.23x for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.