Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
29
HUIHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$14.60
Seasonality move
:
-12.86%
Day range:
$14.60 - $14.60
52-week range:
$14.60 - $14.60
Dividend yield:
0.53%
P/E ratio:
62.17x
P/S ratio:
1.99x
P/B ratio:
0.57x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$943.1M
Revenue:
$468.7M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.64
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HUIHY
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LMPMY
Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MOAEF
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HUIHY
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
$14.60 | -- | $943.1M | 62.17x | $0.28 | 0.53% | 1.99x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
|
$4.08 | -- | $5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 26.18x |
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
$0.15 | -- | $1.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.25x |
|
LMPMY
Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.
|
$4.35 | -- | $1.9B | 10.67x | $0.08 | 3.27% | 0.57x |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MOAEF
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.
|
$0.07 | -- | $13.3M | 0.06x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HUIHY
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
1.74% | 0.107 | -- | 7.34x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
|
-- | 0.108 | -- | -- |
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
0.6% | -2.569 | 0.46% | 4.98x |
|
LMPMY
Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.
|
43.18% | 0.359 | -- | 0.63x |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MOAEF
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.
|
401.01% | 0.903 | -- | 0.19x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HUIHY
Huabao International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.74% | 0.76% | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
INHD
Inno Holdings, Inc.
|
-$16K | -$1.6M | -94.91% | -97.17% | -143.68% | -$594.8K |
|
LMPMY
Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.73% | 4.87% | -- | -- |
|
LUD
Luda Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MOAEF
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -68.67% | -- | -- | -- |
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HUIHY or CHNR?
China Natural Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.76% beat China Natural Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.-- -- $2B CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HUIHY or CHNR?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Natural Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Natural Resources, Inc., analysts believe Huabao International Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Natural Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is HUIHY or CHNR More Risky?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.335, which suggesting that the stock is 66.531% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Natural Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.104, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.592%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUIHY or CHNR?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. China Natural Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Huabao International Holdings Ltd. pays 54.48% of its earnings as a dividend. China Natural Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HUIHY or CHNR?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Natural Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Natural Resources, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 62.17x while China Natural Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huabao International Holdings Ltd. is 1.99x versus 26.18x for China Natural Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.1.99x 62.17x -- -- CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.26.18x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HUIHY or INHD?
Inno Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -142.36%. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.76% beat Inno Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -97.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.-- -- $2B INHDInno Holdings, Inc.-1.47% -$0.30 $8.3M -
What do Analysts Say About HUIHY or INHD?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inno Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Inno Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Huabao International Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Inno Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is HUIHY or INHD More Risky?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.335, which suggesting that the stock is 66.531% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inno Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUIHY or INHD?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Inno Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Huabao International Holdings Ltd. pays 54.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Inno Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HUIHY or INHD?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inno Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Inno Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 62.17x while Inno Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huabao International Holdings Ltd. is 1.99x versus 0.25x for Inno Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.1.99x 62.17x -- -- INHDInno Holdings, Inc.0.25x -- $1.1M -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns HUIHY or LMPMY?
Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.76% beat Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.-- -- $2B LMPMYLee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.-- -- $6.5B -
What do Analysts Say About HUIHY or LMPMY?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd., analysts believe Huabao International Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 LMPMYLee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HUIHY or LMPMY More Risky?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.335, which suggesting that the stock is 66.531% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd. has a beta of 0.358, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.208%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUIHY or LMPMY?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd. offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Huabao International Holdings Ltd. pays 54.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd. pays out 29.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HUIHY or LMPMY?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 62.17x while Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huabao International Holdings Ltd. is 1.99x versus 0.57x for Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.1.99x 62.17x -- -- LMPMYLee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.0.57x 10.67x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HUIHY or LUD?
Luda Technology Group has a net margin of -- compared to Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.76% beat Luda Technology Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.-- -- $2B LUDLuda Technology Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HUIHY or LUD?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Luda Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Luda Technology Group, analysts believe Huabao International Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Luda Technology Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 LUDLuda Technology Group0 0 0 -
Is HUIHY or LUD More Risky?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.335, which suggesting that the stock is 66.531% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luda Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUIHY or LUD?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Luda Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Huabao International Holdings Ltd. pays 54.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Luda Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HUIHY or LUD?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Luda Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Luda Technology Group's net income of --. Notably, Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 62.17x while Luda Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huabao International Holdings Ltd. is 1.99x versus -- for Luda Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.1.99x 62.17x -- -- LUDLuda Technology Group-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HUIHY or MOAEF?
Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.76% beat Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.-- -- $2B MOAEFMongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.-- -- $174.1M -
What do Analysts Say About HUIHY or MOAEF?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Huabao International Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 MOAEFMongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HUIHY or MOAEF More Risky?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.335, which suggesting that the stock is 66.531% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.230, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.031%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HUIHY or MOAEF?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Huabao International Holdings Ltd. pays 54.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HUIHY or MOAEF?
Huabao International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Huabao International Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 62.17x while Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huabao International Holdings Ltd. is 1.99x versus 0.05x for Mongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HUIHYHuabao International Holdings Ltd.1.99x 62.17x -- -- MOAEFMongolia Energy Corp. Ltd.0.05x 0.06x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
