Is Revolution Medicines a Good Stock to Own?
Though it’s still quite early in the year, pharmaceutical startup…
Sell
40
HLPMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.00
Seasonality move
:
-0.06%
Day range:
$10.00 - $10.00
52-week range:
$7.57 - $10.10
Dividend yield:
8.56%
P/E ratio:
15.03x
P/S ratio:
0.24x
P/B ratio:
0.97x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
64
1-year change:
32.03%
Market cap:
$3.1B
Revenue:
$13.8B
EPS (TTM):
$0.67
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLPMF
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DLNG
Dynagas LNG Partners LP
|
$37.8M | $0.28 | -2.97% | 20% | $5.00 |
|
IMPP
Imperial Petroleum, Inc.
|
$45.6M | -- | 73.97% | -- | $6.00 |
|
PXS
Pyxis Tankers, Inc.
|
$11.2M | -- | -6.77% | -- | $9.00 |
|
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.
|
$162.8M | $0.77 | -13.5% | 82.21% | $34.50 |
|
TOPS
Top Ships, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLPMF
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA
|
$10.00 | -- | $3.1B | 15.03x | $0.64 | 8.56% | 0.24x |
|
DLNG
Dynagas LNG Partners LP
|
$3.91 | $5.00 | $142.3M | 2.52x | $0.05 | 6.29% | 0.91x |
|
IMPP
Imperial Petroleum, Inc.
|
$3.98 | $6.00 | $144.2M | 3.72x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.03x |
|
PXS
Pyxis Tankers, Inc.
|
$3.31 | $9.00 | $34.7M | 4.38x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.86x |
|
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.
|
$26.02 | $34.50 | $783.9M | 8.20x | $0.50 | 4.23% | 1.01x |
|
TOPS
Top Ships, Inc.
|
$5.40 | -- | $25M | 1.97x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.28x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLPMF
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA
|
55.82% | 0.768 | 141.53% | 0.91x |
|
DLNG
Dynagas LNG Partners LP
|
38.43% | 0.945 | 142.85% | 58.68x |
|
IMPP
Imperial Petroleum, Inc.
|
0% | 2.597 | 0.01% | 6.39x |
|
PXS
Pyxis Tankers, Inc.
|
45.81% | 0.274 | 221.02% | 3.37x |
|
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.
|
50.87% | 0.713 | 284.59% | 1.17x |
|
TOPS
Top Ships, Inc.
|
65.32% | 0.048 | 522.16% | 0.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLPMF
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA
|
$478.3M | $256.1M | 3.2% | 6.79% | 6.62% | $382.4M |
|
DLNG
Dynagas LNG Partners LP
|
$20.9M | $18.8M | 7.16% | 12.02% | 48.3% | $28M |
|
IMPP
Imperial Petroleum, Inc.
|
$11.3M | $9.4M | 8.86% | 8.86% | 22.63% | $14.2M |
|
PXS
Pyxis Tankers, Inc.
|
$3.4M | $2.1M | -0.05% | -0.09% | 21.98% | $3.5M |
|
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.
|
$60.8M | $51.6M | 3.54% | 7.09% | 27.68% | $85.6M |
|
TOPS
Top Ships, Inc.
|
-- | -- | 0.53% | 1.31% | -- | -- |
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPMF or DLNG?
Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a net margin of 4.57% compared to HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net margin of 47.97%. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's return on equity of 6.79% beat Dynagas LNG Partners LP's return on equity of 12.02%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA12.36% $0.57 $7.2B DLNGDynagas LNG Partners LP53.74% $0.51 $749.5M -
What do Analysts Say About HLPMF or DLNG?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dynagas LNG Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.88%. Given that Dynagas LNG Partners LP has higher upside potential than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA, analysts believe Dynagas LNG Partners LP is more attractive than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0 0 0 DLNGDynagas LNG Partners LP1 0 0 -
Is HLPMF or DLNG More Risky?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.43%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPMF or DLNG?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.56%. Dynagas LNG Partners LP offers a yield of 6.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA pays 230.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Dynagas LNG Partners LP pays out 4.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Dynagas LNG Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPMF or DLNG?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Dynagas LNG Partners LP quarterly revenues of $38.9M. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net income of $176.7M is higher than Dynagas LNG Partners LP's net income of $18.7M. Notably, HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while Dynagas LNG Partners LP's PE ratio is 2.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA is 0.24x versus 0.91x for Dynagas LNG Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0.24x 15.03x $3.9B $176.7M DLNGDynagas LNG Partners LP0.91x 2.52x $38.9M $18.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPMF or IMPP?
Imperial Petroleum, Inc. has a net margin of 4.57% compared to HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net margin of 26.47%. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's return on equity of 6.79% beat Imperial Petroleum, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA12.36% $0.57 $7.2B IMPPImperial Petroleum, Inc.27.35% $0.29 $459M -
What do Analysts Say About HLPMF or IMPP?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Imperial Petroleum, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.75%. Given that Imperial Petroleum, Inc. has higher upside potential than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA, analysts believe Imperial Petroleum, Inc. is more attractive than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0 0 0 IMPPImperial Petroleum, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is HLPMF or IMPP More Risky?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Petroleum, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPMF or IMPP?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.56%. Imperial Petroleum, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA pays 230.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Petroleum, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPMF or IMPP?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Imperial Petroleum, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net income of $176.7M is higher than Imperial Petroleum, Inc.'s net income of $11M. Notably, HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while Imperial Petroleum, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA is 0.24x versus 1.03x for Imperial Petroleum, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0.24x 15.03x $3.9B $176.7M IMPPImperial Petroleum, Inc.1.03x 3.72x $41.4M $11M
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPMF or PXS?
Pyxis Tankers, Inc. has a net margin of 4.57% compared to HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net margin of 12.06%. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's return on equity of 6.79% beat Pyxis Tankers, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA12.36% $0.57 $7.2B PXSPyxis Tankers, Inc.34.93% $0.11 $178.2M -
What do Analysts Say About HLPMF or PXS?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pyxis Tankers, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 171.9%. Given that Pyxis Tankers, Inc. has higher upside potential than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA, analysts believe Pyxis Tankers, Inc. is more attractive than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0 0 0 PXSPyxis Tankers, Inc.2 0 0 -
Is HLPMF or PXS More Risky?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pyxis Tankers, Inc. has a beta of -0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 171.164%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPMF or PXS?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.56%. Pyxis Tankers, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA pays 230.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Pyxis Tankers, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPMF or PXS?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Pyxis Tankers, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.7M. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net income of $176.7M is higher than Pyxis Tankers, Inc.'s net income of $1.2M. Notably, HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while Pyxis Tankers, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA is 0.24x versus 0.86x for Pyxis Tankers, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0.24x 15.03x $3.9B $176.7M PXSPyxis Tankers, Inc.0.86x 4.38x $9.7M $1.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPMF or TEN?
Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. has a net margin of 4.57% compared to HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net margin of 20.7%. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's return on equity of 6.79% beat Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA12.36% $0.57 $7.2B TENTsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.32.64% $1.05 $3.7B -
What do Analysts Say About HLPMF or TEN?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $34.50 which suggests that it could grow by 32.59%. Given that Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. has higher upside potential than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA, analysts believe Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. is more attractive than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0 0 0 TENTsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.2 0 0 -
Is HLPMF or TEN More Risky?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. has a beta of -0.209, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.859%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPMF or TEN?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.56%. Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. offers a yield of 4.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA pays 230.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. pays out 29.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPMF or TEN?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. quarterly revenues of $186.2M. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net income of $176.7M is higher than Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.'s net income of $38.5M. Notably, HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA is 0.24x versus 1.01x for Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0.24x 15.03x $3.9B $176.7M TENTsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.1.01x 8.20x $186.2M $38.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPMF or TOPS?
Top Ships, Inc. has a net margin of 4.57% compared to HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net margin of --. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's return on equity of 6.79% beat Top Ships, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA12.36% $0.57 $7.2B TOPSTop Ships, Inc.-- -- $407.5M -
What do Analysts Say About HLPMF or TOPS?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Top Ships, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 436.84%. Given that Top Ships, Inc. has higher upside potential than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA, analysts believe Top Ships, Inc. is more attractive than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0 0 0 TOPSTop Ships, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is HLPMF or TOPS More Risky?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Top Ships, Inc. has a beta of 2.243, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.332%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPMF or TOPS?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.56%. Top Ships, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA pays 230.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Top Ships, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPMF or TOPS?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Top Ships, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net income of $176.7M is higher than Top Ships, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while Top Ships, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA is 0.24x versus 0.28x for Top Ships, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0.24x 15.03x $3.9B $176.7M TOPSTop Ships, Inc.0.28x 1.97x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Has Vistra Stock Gone Up?
Integrated power generation business Vistra (NYSE:VST) surprised investors recently when…
Why Is Amkor Stock Up So Much?
Semiconductor packaging and testing major Amkor (NASDAQ:AMKR) has started 2026…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
67
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
53
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Alerts
Buy
80
BNR alert for Jan 15
Burning Rock Biotech Ltd. [BNR] is up 18.69% over the past day.
Sell
37
TCOM alert for Jan 15
Trip.com Group Ltd. [TCOM] is down 2.31% over the past day.
Sell
39
DAVE alert for Jan 15
Dave, Inc. [DAVE] is up 3.48% over the past day.
