3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…
Buy
72
HLPMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.57
Seasonality move
:
6.07%
Day range:
$7.57 - $7.57
52-week range:
$7.22 - $9.25
Dividend yield:
11.32%
P/E ratio:
37.09x
P/S ratio:
0.17x
P/B ratio:
0.82x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-9.62%
Market cap:
$2.3B
Revenue:
$13.8B
EPS (TTM):
$0.20
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLPMF
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DLNG
Dynagas LNG Partners LP
|
$37.8M | $0.28 | -2.97% | 20% | $5.00 |
|
IMPP
Imperial Petroleum
|
$39.6M | -- | -33.99% | -- | $5.50 |
|
PXS
Pyxis Tankers
|
$11.3M | -- | -15.97% | -- | $10.00 |
|
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation
|
$173.7M | $0.69 | -23.6% | -76.06% | $29.00 |
|
TOPS
TOP Ships
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLPMF
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA
|
$7.57 | -- | $2.3B | 37.09x | $0.21 | 11.32% | 0.17x |
|
DLNG
Dynagas LNG Partners LP
|
$3.65 | $5.00 | $133.7M | 3.51x | $0.05 | 2.69% | 0.86x |
|
IMPP
Imperial Petroleum
|
$2.74 | $5.50 | $94.3M | 1.92x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.61x |
|
PXS
Pyxis Tankers
|
$3.02 | $10.00 | $31.7M | 3.73x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.69x |
|
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation
|
$17.54 | $29.00 | $528.4M | 3.48x | $0.90 | 8.55% | 0.64x |
|
TOPS
TOP Ships
|
$5.93 | -- | $27.4M | 5.44x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.32x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLPMF
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA
|
47.1% | 0.393 | 108.46% | 0.72x |
|
DLNG
Dynagas LNG Partners LP
|
100% | 1.296 | 160.28% | 101.14x |
|
IMPP
Imperial Petroleum
|
-- | 0.434 | -- | 7.64x |
|
PXS
Pyxis Tankers
|
46.03% | 0.308 | 145.38% | 4.56x |
|
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation
|
-- | -0.097 | -- | 1.17x |
|
TOPS
TOP Ships
|
65.32% | 0.043 | 522.16% | 0.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLPMF
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA
|
$179.7M | -$9.1M | 1.06% | 1.93% | 2.45% | -$5.1M |
|
DLNG
Dynagas LNG Partners LP
|
$21.5M | $19.4M | 16.93% | 11.07% | 46.62% | $32.5M |
|
IMPP
Imperial Petroleum
|
$6.4M | $5M | 12.7% | 12.7% | 16% | $9M |
|
PXS
Pyxis Tankers
|
$6M | $4.7M | 19.46% | 34.57% | 38.45% | $1.9M |
|
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation
|
$78.4M | $57M | 6.33% | 11.15% | 28.45% | $545.1M |
|
TOPS
TOP Ships
|
-- | -- | 0.53% | 1.31% | -- | -- |
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPMF or DLNG?
Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a net margin of 1.59% compared to HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net margin of 33.79%. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's return on equity of 1.93% beat Dynagas LNG Partners LP's return on equity of 11.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA5.58% $0.17 $5.4B DLNGDynagas LNG Partners LP51.72% $0.29 $320.7M -
What do Analysts Say About HLPMF or DLNG?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dynagas LNG Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 36.99%. Given that Dynagas LNG Partners LP has higher upside potential than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA, analysts believe Dynagas LNG Partners LP is more attractive than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0 0 0 DLNGDynagas LNG Partners LP1 0 0 -
Is HLPMF or DLNG More Risky?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a beta of 0.768, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.249%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPMF or DLNG?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.32%. Dynagas LNG Partners LP offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA pays 459.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Dynagas LNG Partners LP pays out 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Dynagas LNG Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPMF or DLNG?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Dynagas LNG Partners LP quarterly revenues of $41.7M. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net income of $51.3M is higher than Dynagas LNG Partners LP's net income of $14.1M. Notably, HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.09x while Dynagas LNG Partners LP's PE ratio is 3.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA is 0.17x versus 0.86x for Dynagas LNG Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0.17x 37.09x $3.2B $51.3M DLNGDynagas LNG Partners LP0.86x 3.51x $41.7M $14.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPMF or IMPP?
Imperial Petroleum has a net margin of 1.59% compared to HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net margin of 14.95%. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's return on equity of 1.93% beat Imperial Petroleum's return on equity of 12.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA5.58% $0.17 $5.4B IMPPImperial Petroleum24.56% $0.10 $420.7M -
What do Analysts Say About HLPMF or IMPP?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Imperial Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 100.73%. Given that Imperial Petroleum has higher upside potential than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA, analysts believe Imperial Petroleum is more attractive than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0 0 0 IMPPImperial Petroleum0 0 0 -
Is HLPMF or IMPP More Risky?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Petroleum has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPMF or IMPP?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.32%. Imperial Petroleum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA pays 459.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Petroleum pays out 3.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPMF or IMPP?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Imperial Petroleum quarterly revenues of $26.2M. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net income of $51.3M is higher than Imperial Petroleum's net income of $3.9M. Notably, HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.09x while Imperial Petroleum's PE ratio is 1.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA is 0.17x versus 0.61x for Imperial Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0.17x 37.09x $3.2B $51.3M IMPPImperial Petroleum0.61x 1.92x $26.2M $3.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPMF or PXS?
Pyxis Tankers has a net margin of 1.59% compared to HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net margin of 26.91%. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's return on equity of 1.93% beat Pyxis Tankers's return on equity of 34.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA5.58% $0.17 $5.4B PXSPyxis Tankers43.51% $0.31 $194.2M -
What do Analysts Say About HLPMF or PXS?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pyxis Tankers has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 231.13%. Given that Pyxis Tankers has higher upside potential than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA, analysts believe Pyxis Tankers is more attractive than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0 0 0 PXSPyxis Tankers2 0 0 -
Is HLPMF or PXS More Risky?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pyxis Tankers has a beta of -0.601, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 160.098%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPMF or PXS?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.32%. Pyxis Tankers offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA pays 459.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Pyxis Tankers pays out 62.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Pyxis Tankers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPMF or PXS?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Pyxis Tankers quarterly revenues of $13.8M. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net income of $51.3M is higher than Pyxis Tankers's net income of $3.7M. Notably, HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.09x while Pyxis Tankers's PE ratio is 3.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA is 0.17x versus 0.69x for Pyxis Tankers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0.17x 37.09x $3.2B $51.3M PXSPyxis Tankers0.69x 3.73x $13.8M $3.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPMF or TEN?
Tsakos Energy Navigation has a net margin of 1.59% compared to HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net margin of 13.26%. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's return on equity of 1.93% beat Tsakos Energy Navigation's return on equity of 11.15%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA5.58% $0.17 $5.4B TENTsakos Energy Navigation36.61% $0.67 $1.7B -
What do Analysts Say About HLPMF or TEN?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tsakos Energy Navigation has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 65.34%. Given that Tsakos Energy Navigation has higher upside potential than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA, analysts believe Tsakos Energy Navigation is more attractive than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0 0 0 TENTsakos Energy Navigation2 1 0 -
Is HLPMF or TEN More Risky?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tsakos Energy Navigation has a beta of -0.253, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.309%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPMF or TEN?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.32%. Tsakos Energy Navigation offers a yield of 8.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA pays 459.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Tsakos Energy Navigation pays out 40.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Tsakos Energy Navigation's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPMF or TEN?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Tsakos Energy Navigation quarterly revenues of $200.2M. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net income of $51.3M is higher than Tsakos Energy Navigation's net income of $26.5M. Notably, HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.09x while Tsakos Energy Navigation's PE ratio is 3.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA is 0.17x versus 0.64x for Tsakos Energy Navigation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0.17x 37.09x $3.2B $51.3M TENTsakos Energy Navigation0.64x 3.48x $200.2M $26.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPMF or TOPS?
TOP Ships has a net margin of 1.59% compared to HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net margin of --. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's return on equity of 1.93% beat TOP Ships's return on equity of 1.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA5.58% $0.17 $5.4B TOPSTOP Ships-- -- $407.5M -
What do Analysts Say About HLPMF or TOPS?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOP Ships has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 388.9%. Given that TOP Ships has higher upside potential than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA, analysts believe TOP Ships is more attractive than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0 0 0 TOPSTOP Ships0 0 0 -
Is HLPMF or TOPS More Risky?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Ships has a beta of 1.727, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.738%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPMF or TOPS?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.32%. TOP Ships offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA pays 459.53% of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Ships pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPMF or TOPS?
HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than TOP Ships quarterly revenues of --. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net income of $51.3M is higher than TOP Ships's net income of --. Notably, HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.09x while TOP Ships's PE ratio is 5.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA is 0.17x versus 0.32x for TOP Ships. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPMFHELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA0.17x 37.09x $3.2B $51.3M TOPSTOP Ships0.32x 5.44x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Butterfly Network the Best Small-Cap Stock?
Brought to public trading by an SPAC merger in early…
Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) may seem like an expensive proposition trading closer…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.
