DLNG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genesis Energy LP has a net margin of 47.97% compared to Dynagas LNG Partners LP's net margin of 5.5%. Dynagas LNG Partners LP's return on equity of 12.02% beat Genesis Energy LP's return on equity of -4.27%.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.28%. On the other hand Genesis Energy LP has an analysts' consensus of $19.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.4%. Given that Dynagas LNG Partners LP has higher upside potential than Genesis Energy LP, analysts believe Dynagas LNG Partners LP is more attractive than Genesis Energy LP.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.43% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genesis Energy LP has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.089%.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.51%. Genesis Energy LP offers a yield of 4.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Dynagas LNG Partners LP pays 4.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Genesis Energy LP pays out 493.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Dynagas LNG Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Genesis Energy LP's is not.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP quarterly revenues are $38.9M, which are smaller than Genesis Energy LP quarterly revenues of $414M. Dynagas LNG Partners LP's net income of $18.7M is lower than Genesis Energy LP's net income of $22.8M. Notably, Dynagas LNG Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.44x while Genesis Energy LP's PE ratio is 34.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dynagas LNG Partners LP is 0.88x versus 1.06x for Genesis Energy LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a net margin of 47.97% compared to Dynagas LNG Partners LP's net margin of 58.55%. Dynagas LNG Partners LP's return on equity of 12.02% beat Marine Petroleum Trust's return on equity of 66.46%.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.28%. On the other hand Marine Petroleum Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dynagas LNG Partners LP has higher upside potential than Marine Petroleum Trust, analysts believe Dynagas LNG Partners LP is more attractive than Marine Petroleum Trust.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.43% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Petroleum Trust has a beta of 0.276, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.438%.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.51%. Marine Petroleum Trust offers a yield of 6.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Dynagas LNG Partners LP pays 4.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Petroleum Trust pays out 106% of its earnings as a dividend. Dynagas LNG Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marine Petroleum Trust's is not.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP quarterly revenues are $38.9M, which are larger than Marine Petroleum Trust quarterly revenues of $223.4K. Dynagas LNG Partners LP's net income of $18.7M is higher than Marine Petroleum Trust's net income of $130.8K. Notably, Dynagas LNG Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.44x while Marine Petroleum Trust's PE ratio is 14.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dynagas LNG Partners LP is 0.88x versus 9.58x for Marine Petroleum Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a net margin of 47.97% compared to Dynagas LNG Partners LP's net margin of 3.7%. Dynagas LNG Partners LP's return on equity of 12.02% beat Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 8.75%.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.28%. On the other hand Plains GP Holdings LP has an analysts' consensus of $20.85 which suggests that it could grow by 1.79%. Given that Dynagas LNG Partners LP has higher upside potential than Plains GP Holdings LP, analysts believe Dynagas LNG Partners LP is more attractive than Plains GP Holdings LP.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.43% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.663%.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.51%. Plains GP Holdings LP offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Dynagas LNG Partners LP pays 4.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains GP Holdings LP pays out 242.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Dynagas LNG Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Plains GP Holdings LP's is not.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP quarterly revenues are $38.9M, which are smaller than Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues of $11.6B. Dynagas LNG Partners LP's net income of $18.7M is lower than Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $428M. Notably, Dynagas LNG Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.44x while Plains GP Holdings LP's PE ratio is 23.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dynagas LNG Partners LP is 0.88x versus 0.09x for Plains GP Holdings LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. has a net margin of 47.97% compared to Dynagas LNG Partners LP's net margin of 20.7%. Dynagas LNG Partners LP's return on equity of 12.02% beat Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.09%.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.28%. On the other hand Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $34.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.98%. Given that Dynagas LNG Partners LP has higher upside potential than Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd., analysts believe Dynagas LNG Partners LP is more attractive than Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd..

Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.43% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. has a beta of -0.209, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.859%.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.51%. Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. offers a yield of 4.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Dynagas LNG Partners LP pays 4.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. pays out 29.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dynagas LNG Partners LP quarterly revenues are $38.9M, which are smaller than Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. quarterly revenues of $186.2M. Dynagas LNG Partners LP's net income of $18.7M is lower than Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.'s net income of $38.5M. Notably, Dynagas LNG Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.44x while Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dynagas LNG Partners LP is 0.88x versus 1.05x for Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.