HDUP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lions Gate Entertainment has a net margin of -- compared to HeadsUp Entertainment International's net margin of -17.22%. HeadsUp Entertainment International's return on equity of -- beat Lions Gate Entertainment's return on equity of -4775.91%.

HeadsUp Entertainment International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lions Gate Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 43.19%. Given that Lions Gate Entertainment has higher upside potential than HeadsUp Entertainment International, analysts believe Lions Gate Entertainment is more attractive than HeadsUp Entertainment International.

HeadsUp Entertainment International has a beta of 0.222, which suggesting that the stock is 77.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lions Gate Entertainment has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.194%.

HeadsUp Entertainment International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lions Gate Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HeadsUp Entertainment International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lions Gate Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HeadsUp Entertainment International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lions Gate Entertainment quarterly revenues of $948.6M. HeadsUp Entertainment International's net income of -- is lower than Lions Gate Entertainment's net income of -$163.3M. Notably, HeadsUp Entertainment International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lions Gate Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HeadsUp Entertainment International is -- versus 0.43x for Lions Gate Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lionsgate Studios has a net margin of -- compared to HeadsUp Entertainment International's net margin of -13.77%. HeadsUp Entertainment International's return on equity of -- beat Lionsgate Studios's return on equity of --.

HeadsUp Entertainment International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lionsgate Studios has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.36%. Given that Lionsgate Studios has higher upside potential than HeadsUp Entertainment International, analysts believe Lionsgate Studios is more attractive than HeadsUp Entertainment International.

HeadsUp Entertainment International has a beta of 0.222, which suggesting that the stock is 77.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lionsgate Studios has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HeadsUp Entertainment International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lionsgate Studios offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HeadsUp Entertainment International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lionsgate Studios pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HeadsUp Entertainment International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lionsgate Studios quarterly revenues of $823.7M. HeadsUp Entertainment International's net income of -- is lower than Lionsgate Studios's net income of -$113.4M. Notably, HeadsUp Entertainment International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lionsgate Studios's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HeadsUp Entertainment International is -- versus 0.71x for Lionsgate Studios. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mega Matrix has a net margin of -- compared to HeadsUp Entertainment International's net margin of -26.8%. HeadsUp Entertainment International's return on equity of -- beat Mega Matrix's return on equity of -52.45%.

HeadsUp Entertainment International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mega Matrix has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.43%. Given that Mega Matrix has higher upside potential than HeadsUp Entertainment International, analysts believe Mega Matrix is more attractive than HeadsUp Entertainment International.

HeadsUp Entertainment International has a beta of 0.222, which suggesting that the stock is 77.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mega Matrix has a beta of 2.911, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 191.071%.

HeadsUp Entertainment International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mega Matrix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HeadsUp Entertainment International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mega Matrix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HeadsUp Entertainment International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mega Matrix quarterly revenues of $10.3M. HeadsUp Entertainment International's net income of -- is lower than Mega Matrix's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, HeadsUp Entertainment International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mega Matrix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HeadsUp Entertainment International is -- versus 2.41x for Mega Matrix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of -- compared to HeadsUp Entertainment International's net margin of 0.02%. HeadsUp Entertainment International's return on equity of -- beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -26.78%.

HeadsUp Entertainment International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.77 which suggests that it could grow by 19.53%. Given that Paramount Global has higher upside potential than HeadsUp Entertainment International, analysts believe Paramount Global is more attractive than HeadsUp Entertainment International.

HeadsUp Entertainment International has a beta of 0.222, which suggesting that the stock is 77.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.712, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.201%.

HeadsUp Entertainment International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. HeadsUp Entertainment International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -73.52% of its earnings as a dividend.

HeadsUp Entertainment International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $6.7B. HeadsUp Entertainment International's net income of -- is lower than Paramount Global's net income of $1M. Notably, HeadsUp Entertainment International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HeadsUp Entertainment International is -- versus 0.24x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.