CNVS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Liberty Media has a net margin of 17.46% compared to Cineverse's net margin of -21.25%. Cineverse's return on equity of -35.17% beat Liberty Media's return on equity of -0.44%.

Cineverse has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 183.33%. On the other hand Liberty Media has an analysts' consensus of $97.50 which suggests that it could grow by 24.64%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Liberty Media, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Liberty Media.

Cineverse has a beta of 1.620, which suggesting that the stock is 61.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Media has a beta of 0.898, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.221%.

Cineverse has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Liberty Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share. Cineverse pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cineverse quarterly revenues are $40.7M, which are smaller than Liberty Media quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Cineverse's net income of $7.1M is higher than Liberty Media's net income of -$248M. Notably, Cineverse's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Liberty Media's PE ratio is 73.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cineverse is 0.65x versus 5.21x for Liberty Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaia has a net margin of 17.46% compared to Cineverse's net margin of -3.29%. Cineverse's return on equity of -35.17% beat Gaia's return on equity of -5.72%.

Cineverse has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 183.33%. On the other hand Gaia has an analysts' consensus of $8.38 which suggests that it could grow by 88.2%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Gaia, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Gaia.

Cineverse has a beta of 1.620, which suggesting that the stock is 61.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaia has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.085000000000002%.

Cineverse has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gaia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cineverse pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gaia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cineverse quarterly revenues are $40.7M, which are larger than Gaia quarterly revenues of $24.4M. Cineverse's net income of $7.1M is higher than Gaia's net income of -$803K. Notably, Cineverse's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gaia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cineverse is 0.65x versus 1.15x for Gaia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of 17.46% compared to Cineverse's net margin of -2.81%. Cineverse's return on equity of -35.17% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -32.18%.

Cineverse has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 183.33%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.75 which suggests that it could grow by 13.84%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Cineverse has a beta of 1.620, which suggesting that the stock is 61.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.314, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.369%.

Cineverse has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Cineverse pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cineverse quarterly revenues are $40.7M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $8B. Cineverse's net income of $7.1M is higher than Paramount Global's net income of -$224M. Notably, Cineverse's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cineverse is 0.65x versus 0.25x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dave & Buster's Entertainment has a net margin of 17.46% compared to Cineverse's net margin of 1.74%. Cineverse's return on equity of -35.17% beat Dave & Buster's Entertainment's return on equity of 24.28%.

Cineverse has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 183.33%. On the other hand Dave & Buster's Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $24.71 which suggests that it could grow by 26.87%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Dave & Buster's Entertainment, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Dave & Buster's Entertainment.

Cineverse has a beta of 1.620, which suggesting that the stock is 61.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dave & Buster's Entertainment has a beta of 1.865, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.512%.

Cineverse has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dave & Buster's Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cineverse pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dave & Buster's Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cineverse quarterly revenues are $40.7M, which are smaller than Dave & Buster's Entertainment quarterly revenues of $534.5M. Cineverse's net income of $7.1M is lower than Dave & Buster's Entertainment's net income of $9.3M. Notably, Cineverse's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dave & Buster's Entertainment's PE ratio is 14.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cineverse is 0.65x versus 0.36x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.