GWLIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Global Management has a net margin of 11.05% compared to Great-West Lifeco's net margin of 10.51%. Great-West Lifeco's return on equity of 12.5% beat Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.84%.

Great-West Lifeco has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Abacus Global Management has an analysts' consensus of $13.70 which suggests that it could grow by 141.2%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than Great-West Lifeco, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than Great-West Lifeco.

Great-West Lifeco has a beta of 0.670, which suggesting that the stock is 32.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Great-West Lifeco has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Abacus Global Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great-West Lifeco pays 54.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great-West Lifeco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great-West Lifeco quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues of $44.1M. Great-West Lifeco's net income of $620.3M is higher than Abacus Global Management's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Great-West Lifeco's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.40x while Abacus Global Management's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great-West Lifeco is 2.08x versus 3.38x for Abacus Global Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 11.05% compared to Great-West Lifeco's net margin of -11.55%. Great-West Lifeco's return on equity of 12.5% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57%.

Great-West Lifeco has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $60.38 which suggests that it could grow by 2.56%. Given that Brighthouse Financial has higher upside potential than Great-West Lifeco, analysts believe Brighthouse Financial is more attractive than Great-West Lifeco.

Great-West Lifeco has a beta of 0.670, which suggesting that the stock is 32.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.915, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.474%.

Great-West Lifeco has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great-West Lifeco pays 54.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great-West Lifeco quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Great-West Lifeco's net income of $620.3M is higher than Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M. Notably, Great-West Lifeco's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.40x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 7.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great-West Lifeco is 2.08x versus 0.53x for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens has a net margin of 11.05% compared to Great-West Lifeco's net margin of -2.92%. Great-West Lifeco's return on equity of 12.5% beat Citizens's return on equity of 4.28%.

Great-West Lifeco has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 47.06%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Great-West Lifeco, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Great-West Lifeco.

Great-West Lifeco has a beta of 0.670, which suggesting that the stock is 32.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.953%.

Great-West Lifeco has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great-West Lifeco pays 54.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great-West Lifeco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great-West Lifeco quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Citizens quarterly revenues of $55.7M. Great-West Lifeco's net income of $620.3M is higher than Citizens's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Great-West Lifeco's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.40x while Citizens's PE ratio is 20.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great-West Lifeco is 2.08x versus 0.71x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial has a net margin of 11.05% compared to Great-West Lifeco's net margin of 3.04%. Great-West Lifeco's return on equity of 12.5% beat Genworth Financial's return on equity of 2.3%.

Great-West Lifeco has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Genworth Financial has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.26%. Given that Genworth Financial has higher upside potential than Great-West Lifeco, analysts believe Genworth Financial is more attractive than Great-West Lifeco.

Great-West Lifeco has a beta of 0.670, which suggesting that the stock is 32.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial has a beta of 1.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.189%.

Great-West Lifeco has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Genworth Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great-West Lifeco pays 54.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great-West Lifeco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great-West Lifeco quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Genworth Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Great-West Lifeco's net income of $620.3M is higher than Genworth Financial's net income of $54M. Notably, Great-West Lifeco's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.40x while Genworth Financial's PE ratio is 15.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great-West Lifeco is 2.08x versus 0.48x for Genworth Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.