Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
44
GRVWF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.26
Seasonality move
:
9.16%
Day range:
$0.26 - $0.26
52-week range:
$0.26 - $0.35
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
11.61x
P/S ratio:
0.71x
P/B ratio:
0.93x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-12.42%
Market cap:
$363.3M
Revenue:
$539.6M
EPS (TTM):
$0.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRVWF
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
$948.8M | $0.67 | 6.68% | 1117.39% | $50.85 |
|
JXG
JX Luxventure Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRVWF
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.
|
$0.26 | -- | $363.3M | 11.61x | $0.03 | 0% | 0.71x |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
$2.39 | -- | $8.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.60x |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
$4.15 | -- | $125.2M | 3.74x | $0.80 | 0% | 0.17x |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
$47.90 | $50.85 | $14.7B | 27.44x | $0.81 | 3.72% | 4.37x |
|
JXG
JX Luxventure Group, Inc.
|
$4.62 | -- | $5.6M | 7.13x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.28x |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
$0.96 | -- | $78.4M | 58.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.65x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRVWF
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.
|
1.1% | 0.856 | 1.08% | 2.22x |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
20.86% | 17.428 | 94.88% | 2.05x |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
17.66% | 0.704 | 42.96% | 0.94x |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
75.77% | -0.398 | 43.41% | 0.78x |
|
JXG
JX Luxventure Group, Inc.
|
3.38% | -0.478 | 4.92% | 0.59x |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
17.09% | -0.754 | 46.02% | 1.15x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRVWF
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 8.55% | 8.84% | -- | -- |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -17.81% | -25.13% | -- | -- |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
$33.4M | $12.1M | 8.03% | 10.53% | 6.29% | $22.8M |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
$408.5M | $283.4M | 8.31% | 33.7% | 28.94% | $208.8M |
|
JXG
JX Luxventure Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | 22.32% | 22.62% | -- | -- |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
$9.4M | -$6.6M | -1.38% | -1.54% | -9.78% | -- |
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GRVWF or BQ?
Boqii Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat Boqii Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -25.13%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.-- -- $437.3M BQBoqii Holding Ltd.-- -- $44.8M -
What do Analysts Say About GRVWF or BQ?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Boqii Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24578.15%. Given that Boqii Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd., analysts believe Boqii Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.0 0 0 BQBoqii Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GRVWF or BQ More Risky?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.261% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boqii Holding Ltd. has a beta of -2.484, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 348.387%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRVWF or BQ?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boqii Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boqii Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRVWF or BQ?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Boqii Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Boqii Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.61x while Boqii Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. is 0.71x versus 8.60x for Boqii Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.0.71x 11.61x -- -- BQBoqii Holding Ltd.8.60x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GRVWF or CAAS?
China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 6.1%. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.-- -- $437.3M CAASChina Automotive Systems, Inc.17.28% $0.32 $507.1M -
What do Analysts Say About GRVWF or CAAS?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Automotive Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 80.72%. Given that China Automotive Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Automotive Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CAASChina Automotive Systems, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GRVWF or CAAS More Risky?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.261% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.83%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRVWF or CAAS?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRVWF or CAAS?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $193.2M. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M. Notably, Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.61x while China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. is 0.71x versus 0.17x for China Automotive Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.0.71x 11.61x -- -- CAASChina Automotive Systems, Inc.0.17x 3.74x $193.2M $11.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns GRVWF or HTHT?
H World Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 21.06%. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat H World Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 33.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.-- -- $437.3M HTHTH World Group Ltd.41.72% $0.63 $6.9B -
What do Analysts Say About GRVWF or HTHT?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand H World Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $50.85 which suggests that it could grow by 6.13%. Given that H World Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd., analysts believe H World Group Ltd. is more attractive than Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.0 0 0 HTHTH World Group Ltd.11 1 0 -
Is GRVWF or HTHT More Risky?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.261% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.874%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRVWF or HTHT?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group Ltd. pays out 120.75% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRVWF or HTHT?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than H World Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $979.3M. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than H World Group Ltd.'s net income of $206.3M. Notably, Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.61x while H World Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 27.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. is 0.71x versus 4.37x for H World Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.0.71x 11.61x -- -- HTHTH World Group Ltd.4.37x 27.44x $979.3M $206.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns GRVWF or JXG?
JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.-- -- $437.3M JXGJX Luxventure Group, Inc.-- -- $18.3M -
What do Analysts Say About GRVWF or JXG?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than JX Luxventure Group, Inc., analysts believe Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. is more attractive than JX Luxventure Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.0 0 0 JXGJX Luxventure Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GRVWF or JXG More Risky?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.261% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.948, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.151%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRVWF or JXG?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRVWF or JXG?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JX Luxventure Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.61x while JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. is 0.71x versus 0.28x for JX Luxventure Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.0.71x 11.61x -- -- JXGJX Luxventure Group, Inc.0.28x 7.13x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GRVWF or KNDI?
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s net margin of -13.73%. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.-- -- $437.3M KNDIKandi Technologies Group, Inc.31.3% -$0.05 $493.5M -
What do Analysts Say About GRVWF or KNDI?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 423.56%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd., analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. is more attractive than Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.0 0 0 KNDIKandi Technologies Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GRVWF or KNDI More Risky?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.261% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.766%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRVWF or KNDI?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRVWF or KNDI?
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.9M. Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.61x while Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd. is 0.71x versus 0.65x for Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRVWFGreatview Aseptic Packaging Co., Ltd.0.71x 11.61x -- -- KNDIKandi Technologies Group, Inc.0.65x 58.83x $29.9M -$4.1M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
50
TGL alert for Dec 8
Treasure Global, Inc. [TGL] is up 7.35% over the past day.
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 47.5% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 10.15% over the past day.
