Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
33
FSUMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$14.40
Seasonality move
:
8.44%
Day range:
$14.40 - $14.40
52-week range:
$8.45 - $15.57
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
13.88x
P/S ratio:
2.85x
P/B ratio:
2.05x
Volume:
8
Avg. volume:
2.5K
1-year change:
21.01%
Market cap:
$44.3B
Revenue:
$15.5B
EPS (TTM):
$1.10
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUMF
Fortescue Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $62.93 |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUMF
Fortescue Ltd.
|
$14.40 | -- | $44.3B | 13.88x | $0.32 | 0% | 2.85x |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
$76.82 | $62.93 | $195.1B | 19.05x | $1.20 | 2.86% | 3.61x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.25x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
$0.06 | -- | $29.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 13.60x |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
$1.52 | -- | $581.8M | 101.84x | $0.03 | 0% | 0.26x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
$0.06 | -- | $20.4M | 47.38x | $0.01 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUMF
Fortescue Ltd.
|
22.06% | 0.522 | -- | 1.89x |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
30.73% | 0.128 | -- | 1.21x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
9.38% | 0.000 | -- | 1.16x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
38.76% | -0.121 | 18.45% | 0.44x |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
44.7% | -3.351 | -- | 1.20x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -0.421 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUMF
Fortescue Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 20.22% | 26.33% | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 16.7% | 23.67% | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -24.73% | -26.41% | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -33.72% | -45.85% | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.75% | -1.2% | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Fortescue Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUMF or BHP?
BHP Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.33% beat BHP Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 23.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUMFFortescue Ltd.-- -- $24.6B BHPBHP Group Ltd.-- -- $69.8B -
What do Analysts Say About FSUMF or BHP?
Fortescue Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BHP Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $62.93 which suggests that it could fall by -18.08%. Given that BHP Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Fortescue Ltd., analysts believe BHP Group Ltd. is more attractive than Fortescue Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUMFFortescue Ltd.0 0 0 BHPBHP Group Ltd.2 3 1 -
Is FSUMF or BHP More Risky?
Fortescue Ltd. has a beta of 1.005, which suggesting that the stock is 0.53099999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BHP Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.707, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.289%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUMF or BHP?
Fortescue Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BHP Group Ltd. offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Fortescue Ltd. pays 64.94% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group Ltd. pays out 61.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUMF or BHP?
Fortescue Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BHP Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than BHP Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortescue Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.88x while BHP Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 19.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue Ltd. is 2.85x versus 3.61x for BHP Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUMFFortescue Ltd.2.85x 13.88x -- -- BHPBHP Group Ltd.3.61x 19.05x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUMF or FTZZF?
Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.33% beat Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s return on equity of -26.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUMFFortescue Ltd.-- -- $24.6B FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.-- -- $7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About FSUMF or FTZZF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue Ltd. has higher upside potential than Canadian Phosphate Ltd., analysts believe Fortescue Ltd. is more attractive than Canadian Phosphate Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUMFFortescue Ltd.0 0 0 FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FSUMF or FTZZF More Risky?
Fortescue Ltd. has a beta of 1.005, which suggesting that the stock is 0.53099999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a beta of -0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 189.253%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUMF or FTZZF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue Ltd. pays 64.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUMF or FTZZF?
Fortescue Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Canadian Phosphate Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortescue Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.88x while Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue Ltd. is 2.85x versus 1.25x for Canadian Phosphate Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUMFFortescue Ltd.2.85x 13.88x -- -- FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.1.25x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUMF or HMIFF?
Harvest Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.33% beat Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -45.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUMFFortescue Ltd.-- -- $24.6B HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.-- -- $5.2M -
What do Analysts Say About FSUMF or HMIFF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue Ltd. has higher upside potential than Harvest Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Fortescue Ltd. is more attractive than Harvest Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUMFFortescue Ltd.0 0 0 HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FSUMF or HMIFF More Risky?
Fortescue Ltd. has a beta of 1.005, which suggesting that the stock is 0.53099999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUMF or HMIFF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harvest Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue Ltd. pays 64.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUMF or HMIFF?
Fortescue Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortescue Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.88x while Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue Ltd. is 2.85x versus 13.60x for Harvest Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUMFFortescue Ltd.2.85x 13.88x -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.13.60x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUMF or NUFMF?
Nufarm Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.33% beat Nufarm Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUMFFortescue Ltd.-- -- $24.6B NUFMFNufarm Ltd.-- -- $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About FSUMF or NUFMF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nufarm Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nufarm Ltd., analysts believe Fortescue Ltd. is more attractive than Nufarm Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUMFFortescue Ltd.0 0 0 NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FSUMF or NUFMF More Risky?
Fortescue Ltd. has a beta of 1.005, which suggesting that the stock is 0.53099999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nufarm Ltd. has a beta of -0.256, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.57%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUMF or NUFMF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nufarm Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Fortescue Ltd. pays 64.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Nufarm Ltd. pays out 951.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nufarm Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUMF or NUFMF?
Fortescue Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nufarm Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Nufarm Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortescue Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.88x while Nufarm Ltd.'s PE ratio is 101.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue Ltd. is 2.85x versus 0.26x for Nufarm Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUMFFortescue Ltd.2.85x 13.88x -- -- NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0.26x 101.84x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUMF or SBMSF?
Danakali Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.33% beat Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUMFFortescue Ltd.-- -- $24.6B SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FSUMF or SBMSF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue Ltd. has higher upside potential than Danakali Ltd., analysts believe Fortescue Ltd. is more attractive than Danakali Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUMFFortescue Ltd.0 0 0 SBMSFDanakali Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FSUMF or SBMSF More Risky?
Fortescue Ltd. has a beta of 1.005, which suggesting that the stock is 0.53099999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.229%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUMF or SBMSF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Danakali Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Fortescue Ltd. pays 64.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUMF or SBMSF?
Fortescue Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Danakali Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortescue Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.88x while Danakali Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue Ltd. is 2.85x versus -- for Danakali Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUMFFortescue Ltd.2.85x 13.88x -- -- SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- 47.38x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
