Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
64
FSUMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$15.37
Seasonality move
:
66.73%
Day range:
$15.37 - $15.37
52-week range:
$8.45 - $15.37
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
14.04x
P/S ratio:
3.05x
P/B ratio:
2.05x
Volume:
31
Avg. volume:
1.2K
1-year change:
33.94%
Market cap:
$47.3B
Revenue:
$15.5B
EPS (TTM):
$1.10
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUMF
Fortescue Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $54.75 |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $10.00 |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUMF
Fortescue Ltd.
|
$15.37 | -- | $47.3B | 14.04x | $0.32 | 0% | 3.05x |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
$61.89 | $54.75 | $157.1B | 17.44x | $1.20 | 3.56% | 3.07x |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
$5.10 | -- | $300.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
$7.23 | $10.00 | $48.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
$0.05 | -- | $18.4M | 47.38x | $0.01 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUMF
Fortescue Ltd.
|
22.06% | 0.858 | -- | 1.89x |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
30.73% | 0.437 | -- | 1.21x |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
-- | 1.380 | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | 1.023 | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -0.979 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUMF
Fortescue Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 20.22% | 26.33% | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 16.7% | 23.67% | -- | -- |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Fortescue Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUMF or BHP?
BHP Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.33% beat BHP Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 23.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUMFFortescue Ltd.-- -- $24.6B BHPBHP Group Ltd.-- -- $69.8B -
What do Analysts Say About FSUMF or BHP?
Fortescue Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BHP Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $54.75 which suggests that it could fall by -11.54%. Given that BHP Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Fortescue Ltd., analysts believe BHP Group Ltd. is more attractive than Fortescue Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUMFFortescue Ltd.0 0 0 BHPBHP Group Ltd.1 4 1 -
Is FSUMF or BHP More Risky?
Fortescue Ltd. has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BHP Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.722%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUMF or BHP?
Fortescue Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BHP Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Fortescue Ltd. pays 64.94% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group Ltd. pays out 61.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUMF or BHP?
Fortescue Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BHP Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than BHP Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortescue Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.04x while BHP Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue Ltd. is 3.05x versus 3.07x for BHP Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUMFFortescue Ltd.3.05x 14.04x -- -- BHPBHP Group Ltd.3.07x 17.44x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUMF or IONR?
ioneer Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.33% beat ioneer Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUMFFortescue Ltd.-- -- $24.6B IONRioneer Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FSUMF or IONR?
Fortescue Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ioneer Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 449.02%. Given that ioneer Ltd. has higher upside potential than Fortescue Ltd., analysts believe ioneer Ltd. is more attractive than Fortescue Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUMFFortescue Ltd.0 0 0 IONRioneer Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FSUMF or IONR More Risky?
Fortescue Ltd. has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ioneer Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUMF or IONR?
Fortescue Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ioneer Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue Ltd. pays 64.94% of its earnings as a dividend. ioneer Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUMF or IONR?
Fortescue Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ioneer Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than ioneer Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortescue Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.04x while ioneer Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue Ltd. is 3.05x versus -- for ioneer Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUMFFortescue Ltd.3.05x 14.04x -- -- IONRioneer Ltd.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUMF or NVA?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.33% beat Nova Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUMFFortescue Ltd.-- -- $24.6B NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FSUMF or NVA?
Fortescue Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 38.31%. Given that Nova Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Fortescue Ltd., analysts believe Nova Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Fortescue Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUMFFortescue Ltd.0 0 0 NVANova Minerals Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is FSUMF or NVA More Risky?
Fortescue Ltd. has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUMF or NVA?
Fortescue Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nova Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue Ltd. pays 64.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUMF or NVA?
Fortescue Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortescue Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.04x while Nova Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue Ltd. is 3.05x versus -- for Nova Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUMFFortescue Ltd.3.05x 14.04x -- -- NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUMF or SBMSF?
Danakali Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.33% beat Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUMFFortescue Ltd.-- -- $24.6B SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FSUMF or SBMSF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue Ltd. has higher upside potential than Danakali Ltd., analysts believe Fortescue Ltd. is more attractive than Danakali Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUMFFortescue Ltd.0 0 0 SBMSFDanakali Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FSUMF or SBMSF More Risky?
Fortescue Ltd. has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.643%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUMF or SBMSF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Danakali Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Fortescue Ltd. pays 64.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUMF or SBMSF?
Fortescue Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Danakali Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortescue Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.04x while Danakali Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue Ltd. is 3.05x versus -- for Danakali Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUMFFortescue Ltd.3.05x 14.04x -- -- SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- 47.38x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
