FQVLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

California-Engels Mining Co. has a net margin of 7.12% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of -223.74%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.56% beat California-Engels Mining Co.'s return on equity of 1.62%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.1%. On the other hand California-Engels Mining Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than California-Engels Mining Co., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than California-Engels Mining Co..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California-Engels Mining Co. has a beta of 0.226, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.394%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. California-Engels Mining Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. California-Engels Mining Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than California-Engels Mining Co. quarterly revenues of $13.9K. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of $105M is higher than California-Engels Mining Co.'s net income of -$31.1K. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 516.67x while California-Engels Mining Co.'s PE ratio is 238.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.38x versus 35.96x for California-Engels Mining Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 7.12% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.56% beat Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9491.01%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.1%. On the other hand Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 8.484, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 748.414%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $20.3K. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of $105M is higher than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $21.2M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 516.67x while Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.38x versus 1,460.10x for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Royal Development, Inc. has a net margin of 7.12% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.56% beat Golden Royal Development, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.1%. On the other hand Golden Royal Development, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Golden Royal Development, Inc., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Golden Royal Development, Inc..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Royal Development, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golden Royal Development, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Royal Development, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Golden Royal Development, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of $105M is higher than Golden Royal Development, Inc.'s net income of -$6.1K. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 516.67x while Golden Royal Development, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.38x versus -- for Golden Royal Development, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Metaline Contact Mines Co. has a net margin of 7.12% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.56% beat Metaline Contact Mines Co.'s return on equity of --.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.1%. On the other hand Metaline Contact Mines Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Metaline Contact Mines Co., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Metaline Contact Mines Co..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metaline Contact Mines Co. has a beta of 2.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.373%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Metaline Contact Mines Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Metaline Contact Mines Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Metaline Contact Mines Co. quarterly revenues of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of $105M is higher than Metaline Contact Mines Co.'s net income of --. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 516.67x while Metaline Contact Mines Co.'s PE ratio is 200.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.38x versus 23.36x for Metaline Contact Mines Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.