FQVLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 3.66%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling downside risk potential of -2.21%. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 61.05%. Given that Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Flexible Solutions International, Inc. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.400, which suggesting that the stock is 40.04% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.501%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.6M. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$78M is lower than Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s net income of $386.7K. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 430.71x while Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 47.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 3.95x versus 2.26x for Flexible Solutions International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brazil Potash Corp has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Brazil Potash Corp's return on equity of --.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling downside risk potential of -2.21%. On the other hand Brazil Potash Corp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Brazil Potash Corp, analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Brazil Potash Corp.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.400, which suggesting that the stock is 40.04% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brazil Potash Corp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brazil Potash Corp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brazil Potash Corp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Brazil Potash Corp quarterly revenues of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$78M is higher than Brazil Potash Corp's net income of --. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 430.71x while Brazil Potash Corp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 3.95x versus -- for Brazil Potash Corp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of -27.31%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling downside risk potential of -2.21%. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.79 which suggests that it could grow by 15.04%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.400, which suggesting that the stock is 40.04% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$78M is lower than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 430.71x while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 3.95x versus 49.04x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercer International, Inc. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of -17.64%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Mercer International, Inc.'s return on equity of -39.38%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling downside risk potential of -2.21%. On the other hand Mercer International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.31 which suggests that it could grow by 7.42%. Given that Mercer International, Inc. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Mercer International, Inc. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.400, which suggesting that the stock is 40.04% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercer International, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.008%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mercer International, Inc. offers a yield of 15.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercer International, Inc. pays out 23.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercer International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Mercer International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $458.1M. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$78M is higher than Mercer International, Inc.'s net income of -$80.8M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 430.71x while Mercer International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 3.95x versus 0.07x for Mercer International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.