FQVLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Golden Royal Development has a net margin of 8.44% compared to First Quantum Minerals's net margin of --. First Quantum Minerals's return on equity of -13.26% beat Golden Royal Development's return on equity of --.

First Quantum Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.77%. On the other hand Golden Royal Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Quantum Minerals has higher upside potential than Golden Royal Development, analysts believe First Quantum Minerals is more attractive than Golden Royal Development.

First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 50.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Royal Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

First Quantum Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golden Royal Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals pays -9.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Royal Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Golden Royal Development quarterly revenues of --. First Quantum Minerals's net income of $108M is higher than Golden Royal Development's net income of -$6.1K. Notably, First Quantum Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Golden Royal Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals is 2.13x versus -- for Golden Royal Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty has a net margin of 8.44% compared to First Quantum Minerals's net margin of -124.64%. First Quantum Minerals's return on equity of -13.26% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -3.65%.

First Quantum Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.77%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.39 which suggests that it could grow by 171.89%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals.

First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 50.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

First Quantum Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. First Quantum Minerals pays -9.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -9.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $2.1M. First Quantum Minerals's net income of $108M is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of $3.4M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals is 2.13x versus 23.37x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Metaline Contact Mines has a net margin of 8.44% compared to First Quantum Minerals's net margin of --. First Quantum Minerals's return on equity of -13.26% beat Metaline Contact Mines's return on equity of --.

First Quantum Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.77%. On the other hand Metaline Contact Mines has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Quantum Minerals has higher upside potential than Metaline Contact Mines, analysts believe First Quantum Minerals is more attractive than Metaline Contact Mines.

First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 50.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metaline Contact Mines has a beta of 0.963, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.699%.

First Quantum Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Metaline Contact Mines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals pays -9.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Metaline Contact Mines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Metaline Contact Mines quarterly revenues of --. First Quantum Minerals's net income of $108M is higher than Metaline Contact Mines's net income of --. Notably, First Quantum Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Metaline Contact Mines's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals is 2.13x versus -- for Metaline Contact Mines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 8.44% compared to First Quantum Minerals's net margin of --. First Quantum Minerals's return on equity of -13.26% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

First Quantum Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.77%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 250.78%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals.

First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 50.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.435%.

First Quantum Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals pays -9.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. First Quantum Minerals's net income of $108M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals is 2.13x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.