FQVLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Golden Royal Development, Inc. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Golden Royal Development, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling downside risk potential of -12.92%. On the other hand Golden Royal Development, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Golden Royal Development, Inc., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Golden Royal Development, Inc..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.400, which suggesting that the stock is 40.04% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Royal Development, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golden Royal Development, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Royal Development, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Golden Royal Development, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$78M is lower than Golden Royal Development, Inc.'s net income of -$6.1K. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 483.70x while Golden Royal Development, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.43x versus -- for Golden Royal Development, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of -27.31%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling downside risk potential of -12.92%. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.11 which suggests that it could grow by 22.47%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.400, which suggesting that the stock is 40.04% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$78M is lower than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 483.70x while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.43x versus 49.16x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Metaline Contact Mines Co. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Metaline Contact Mines Co.'s return on equity of --.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling downside risk potential of -12.92%. On the other hand Metaline Contact Mines Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Metaline Contact Mines Co., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Metaline Contact Mines Co..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.400, which suggesting that the stock is 40.04% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metaline Contact Mines Co. has a beta of 2.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.148%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Metaline Contact Mines Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Metaline Contact Mines Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Metaline Contact Mines Co. quarterly revenues of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$78M is higher than Metaline Contact Mines Co.'s net income of --. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 483.70x while Metaline Contact Mines Co.'s PE ratio is 880.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.43x versus 79.36x for Metaline Contact Mines Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling downside risk potential of -12.92%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 44.07%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.400, which suggesting that the stock is 40.04% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$78M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 483.70x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.43x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.