FNXTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aptiv Plc has a net margin of 10.13% compared to Fenix Outdoor International AG's net margin of -6.75%. Fenix Outdoor International AG's return on equity of 2.15% beat Aptiv Plc's return on equity of 3.28%.

Fenix Outdoor International AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aptiv Plc has an analysts' consensus of $99.81 which suggests that it could grow by 27.49%. Given that Aptiv Plc has higher upside potential than Fenix Outdoor International AG, analysts believe Aptiv Plc is more attractive than Fenix Outdoor International AG.

Fenix Outdoor International AG has a beta of 0.199, which suggesting that the stock is 80.116% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aptiv Plc has a beta of 1.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.357%.

Fenix Outdoor International AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Aptiv Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fenix Outdoor International AG pays 120.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Aptiv Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fenix Outdoor International AG quarterly revenues are $241.2M, which are smaller than Aptiv Plc quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Fenix Outdoor International AG's net income of $24.4M is higher than Aptiv Plc's net income of -$352M. Notably, Fenix Outdoor International AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 79.75x while Aptiv Plc's PE ratio is 62.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fenix Outdoor International AG is 0.99x versus 0.88x for Aptiv Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has a net margin of 10.13% compared to Fenix Outdoor International AG's net margin of --. Fenix Outdoor International AG's return on equity of 2.15% beat Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's return on equity of 12.76%.

Fenix Outdoor International AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has an analysts' consensus of $22.39 which suggests that it could grow by 6.25%. Given that Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has higher upside potential than Fenix Outdoor International AG, analysts believe Compagnie Financière Richemont SA is more attractive than Fenix Outdoor International AG.

Fenix Outdoor International AG has a beta of 0.199, which suggesting that the stock is 80.116% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has a beta of 1.216, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.571%.

Fenix Outdoor International AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Fenix Outdoor International AG pays 120.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA pays out -45.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

Fenix Outdoor International AG quarterly revenues are $241.2M, which are larger than Compagnie Financière Richemont SA quarterly revenues of --. Fenix Outdoor International AG's net income of $24.4M is higher than Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's net income of --. Notably, Fenix Outdoor International AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 79.75x while Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's PE ratio is 32.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fenix Outdoor International AG is 0.99x versus 4.13x for Compagnie Financière Richemont SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a net margin of 10.13% compared to Fenix Outdoor International AG's net margin of 8.54%. Fenix Outdoor International AG's return on equity of 2.15% beat Garrett Motion, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Fenix Outdoor International AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Garrett Motion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.80 which suggests that it could grow by 19.61%. Given that Garrett Motion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fenix Outdoor International AG, analysts believe Garrett Motion, Inc. is more attractive than Fenix Outdoor International AG.

Fenix Outdoor International AG has a beta of 0.199, which suggesting that the stock is 80.116% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Garrett Motion, Inc. has a beta of 0.227, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.297%.

Fenix Outdoor International AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Garrett Motion, Inc. offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Fenix Outdoor International AG pays 120.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion, Inc. pays out 4.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Fenix Outdoor International AG's is not.

Fenix Outdoor International AG quarterly revenues are $241.2M, which are smaller than Garrett Motion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $902M. Fenix Outdoor International AG's net income of $24.4M is lower than Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net income of $77M. Notably, Fenix Outdoor International AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 79.75x while Garrett Motion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fenix Outdoor International AG is 0.99x versus 1.02x for Garrett Motion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

On Holding AG has a net margin of 10.13% compared to Fenix Outdoor International AG's net margin of 14.97%. Fenix Outdoor International AG's return on equity of 2.15% beat On Holding AG's return on equity of 15.78%.

Fenix Outdoor International AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand On Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of $62.16 which suggests that it could grow by 27.97%. Given that On Holding AG has higher upside potential than Fenix Outdoor International AG, analysts believe On Holding AG is more attractive than Fenix Outdoor International AG.

Fenix Outdoor International AG has a beta of 0.199, which suggesting that the stock is 80.116% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison On Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fenix Outdoor International AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. On Holding AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fenix Outdoor International AG pays 120.93% of its earnings as a dividend. On Holding AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fenix Outdoor International AG quarterly revenues are $241.2M, which are smaller than On Holding AG quarterly revenues of $992.6M. Fenix Outdoor International AG's net income of $24.4M is lower than On Holding AG's net income of $148.6M. Notably, Fenix Outdoor International AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 79.75x while On Holding AG's PE ratio is 61.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fenix Outdoor International AG is 0.99x versus 4.74x for On Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.