EVOH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ferguson Enterprises has a net margin of -996.13% compared to EvoAir Holdings's net margin of 6.05%. EvoAir Holdings's return on equity of -7.29% beat Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 30.58%.

EvoAir Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ferguson Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.16%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than EvoAir Holdings, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than EvoAir Holdings.

EvoAir Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.394%.

EvoAir Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ferguson Enterprises offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. EvoAir Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises pays out 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EvoAir Holdings quarterly revenues are $89.6K, which are smaller than Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues of $7.8B. EvoAir Holdings's net income of -$892.7K is lower than Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $470M. Notably, EvoAir Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ferguson Enterprises's PE ratio is 21.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EvoAir Holdings is 1,876.57x versus 1.22x for Ferguson Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of -996.13% compared to EvoAir Holdings's net margin of 8.07%. EvoAir Holdings's return on equity of -7.29% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 33.79%.

EvoAir Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.89%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than EvoAir Holdings, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than EvoAir Holdings.

EvoAir Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.538%.

EvoAir Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. EvoAir Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 9.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EvoAir Holdings quarterly revenues are $89.6K, which are smaller than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.8B. EvoAir Holdings's net income of -$892.7K is lower than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $146.2M. Notably, EvoAir Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 33.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EvoAir Holdings is 1,876.57x versus 2.41x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Johnson Controls International PLC has a net margin of -996.13% compared to EvoAir Holdings's net margin of 21.62%. EvoAir Holdings's return on equity of -7.29% beat Johnson Controls International PLC's return on equity of 9.81%.

EvoAir Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Johnson Controls International PLC has an analysts' consensus of $88.15 which suggests that it could grow by 9.31%. Given that Johnson Controls International PLC has higher upside potential than EvoAir Holdings, analysts believe Johnson Controls International PLC is more attractive than EvoAir Holdings.

EvoAir Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Controls International PLC has a beta of 1.311, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.054%.

EvoAir Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Johnson Controls International PLC offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. EvoAir Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Controls International PLC pays out 58.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Controls International PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EvoAir Holdings quarterly revenues are $89.6K, which are smaller than Johnson Controls International PLC quarterly revenues of $2.9B. EvoAir Holdings's net income of -$892.7K is lower than Johnson Controls International PLC's net income of $633M. Notably, EvoAir Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Johnson Controls International PLC's PE ratio is 31.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EvoAir Holdings is 1,876.57x versus 2.37x for Johnson Controls International PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPX Technologies has a net margin of -996.13% compared to EvoAir Holdings's net margin of 10.38%. EvoAir Holdings's return on equity of -7.29% beat SPX Technologies's return on equity of 14.06%.

EvoAir Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $134.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.91%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than EvoAir Holdings, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than EvoAir Holdings.

EvoAir Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.265, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.479%.

EvoAir Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPX Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EvoAir Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPX Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EvoAir Holdings quarterly revenues are $89.6K, which are smaller than SPX Technologies quarterly revenues of $483.7M. EvoAir Holdings's net income of -$892.7K is lower than SPX Technologies's net income of $50.2M. Notably, EvoAir Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPX Technologies's PE ratio is 38.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EvoAir Holdings is 1,876.57x versus 3.51x for SPX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.