FERG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal Co. has a net margin of 8.24% compared to Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.'s net margin of 15.73%. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of 33% beat Fastenal Co.'s return on equity of 32.96%.

Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. has a consensus price target of $259.36, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand Fastenal Co. has an analysts' consensus of $43.46 which suggests that it could grow by 4.1%. Given that Fastenal Co. has higher upside potential than Ferguson Enterprises, Inc., analysts believe Fastenal Co. is more attractive than Ferguson Enterprises, Inc..

Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 1.150, which suggesting that the stock is 14.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal Co. has a beta of 0.889, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.105%.

Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Fastenal Co. offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. pays 35.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal Co. pays out 77.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Fastenal Co. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of $700M is higher than Fastenal Co.'s net income of $335.5M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.75x while Fastenal Co.'s PE ratio is 31.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. is 1.62x versus 4.50x for Fastenal Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a net margin of 8.24% compared to Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.'s net margin of 11.9%. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of 33% beat Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s return on equity of 45.16%.

Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. has a consensus price target of $259.36, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1,060.80 which suggests that it could grow by 5.59%. Given that Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ferguson Enterprises, Inc., analysts believe Comfort Systems USA, Inc. is more attractive than Ferguson Enterprises, Inc..

Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 1.150, which suggesting that the stock is 14.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a beta of 1.640, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.986%.

Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Comfort Systems USA, Inc. offers a yield of 0.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. pays 35.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA, Inc. pays out 8.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Comfort Systems USA, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of $700M is higher than Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s net income of $291.6M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.75x while Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s PE ratio is 42.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. is 1.62x versus 4.29x for Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPX Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 8.24% compared to Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.'s net margin of 10.64%. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of 33% beat SPX Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.22%.

Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. has a consensus price target of $259.36, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand SPX Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $230.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.99%. Given that SPX Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ferguson Enterprises, Inc., analysts believe SPX Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Ferguson Enterprises, Inc..

Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 1.150, which suggesting that the stock is 14.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPX Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.148%.

Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. SPX Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. pays 35.63% of its earnings as a dividend. SPX Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than SPX Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $592.8M. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of $700M is higher than SPX Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $63.1M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.75x while SPX Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. is 1.62x versus 4.62x for SPX Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.