FIX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EMCOR Group, Inc. has a net margin of 11.9% compared to Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s net margin of 6.87%. Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s return on equity of 45.16% beat EMCOR Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.58%.

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1,060.80, signalling upside risk potential of 11.75%. On the other hand EMCOR Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $758.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.94%. Given that EMCOR Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, Inc., analysts believe EMCOR Group, Inc. is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA, Inc..

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a beta of 1.640, which suggesting that the stock is 63.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.953%.

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. EMCOR Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Comfort Systems USA, Inc. pays 8.22% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group, Inc. pays out 4.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than EMCOR Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s net income of $291.6M is lower than EMCOR Group, Inc.'s net income of $295.4M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.20x while EMCOR Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. is 4.05x versus 1.71x for EMCOR Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasTec, Inc. has a net margin of 11.9% compared to Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s net margin of 4.2%. Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s return on equity of 45.16% beat MasTec, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.82%.

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1,060.80, signalling upside risk potential of 11.75%. On the other hand MasTec, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $246.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13%. Given that MasTec, Inc. has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, Inc., analysts believe MasTec, Inc. is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA, Inc..

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a beta of 1.640, which suggesting that the stock is 63.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec, Inc. has a beta of 1.938, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.842%.

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. MasTec, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comfort Systems USA, Inc. pays 8.22% of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than MasTec, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4B. Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s net income of $291.6M is higher than MasTec, Inc.'s net income of $166.5M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.20x while MasTec, Inc.'s PE ratio is 51.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. is 4.05x versus 1.25x for MasTec, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a net margin of 11.9% compared to Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s net margin of 4.49%. Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s return on equity of 45.16% beat Quanta Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.57%.

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1,060.80, signalling upside risk potential of 11.75%. On the other hand Quanta Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $474.38 which suggests that it could grow by 4.03%. Given that Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, Inc., analysts believe Comfort Systems USA, Inc. is more attractive than Quanta Services, Inc..

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a beta of 1.640, which suggesting that the stock is 63.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanta Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.106%.

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Quanta Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Comfort Systems USA, Inc. pays 8.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc. pays out 6.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Quanta Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s net income of $291.6M is lower than Quanta Services, Inc.'s net income of $342.8M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.20x while Quanta Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 67.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. is 4.05x versus 2.53x for Quanta Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.