FIX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The AZEK has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 6.35%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 35.18% beat The AZEK's return on equity of 10.63%.

Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $493.00, signalling upside risk potential of 52.11%. On the other hand The AZEK has an analysts' consensus of $56.21 which suggests that it could grow by 13.22%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than The AZEK, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than The AZEK.

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.62% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The AZEK has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Comfort Systems USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. The AZEK offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comfort Systems USA pays 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. The AZEK pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than The AZEK quarterly revenues of $285.4M. Comfort Systems USA's net income of $145.9M is higher than The AZEK's net income of $18.1M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.18x while The AZEK's PE ratio is 50.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA is 1.65x versus 4.90x for The AZEK. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fastenal has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 14.37%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 35.18% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 32.9%.

Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $493.00, signalling upside risk potential of 52.11%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $75.35 which suggests that it could fall by -1.07%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than Fastenal.

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.62% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.817%.

Comfort Systems USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Comfort Systems USA pays 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Comfort Systems USA's net income of $145.9M is lower than Fastenal's net income of $262.1M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.18x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 37.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA is 1.65x versus 5.80x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ferguson Enterprises has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 4.02%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 35.18% beat Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 29.6%.

Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $493.00, signalling upside risk potential of 52.11%. On the other hand Ferguson Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $194.59 which suggests that it could grow by 21.23%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than Ferguson Enterprises, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than Ferguson Enterprises.

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.62% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.337, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.675%.

Comfort Systems USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Ferguson Enterprises offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Comfort Systems USA pays 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises pays out 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues of $6.9B. Comfort Systems USA's net income of $145.9M is lower than Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $276M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.18x while Ferguson Enterprises's PE ratio is 19.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA is 1.65x versus 1.08x for Ferguson Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPX Technologies has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 10.7%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 35.18% beat SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.52%.

Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $493.00, signalling upside risk potential of 52.11%. On the other hand SPX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $171.50 which suggests that it could grow by 32.5%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than SPX Technologies, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than SPX Technologies.

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.62% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.265, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.521%.

Comfort Systems USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. SPX Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comfort Systems USA pays 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. SPX Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than SPX Technologies quarterly revenues of $533.7M. Comfort Systems USA's net income of $145.9M is higher than SPX Technologies's net income of $57.1M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.18x while SPX Technologies's PE ratio is 30.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA is 1.65x versus 3.07x for SPX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.