ENTOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 38.1% compared to Entra ASA's net margin of 0.91%. Entra ASA's return on equity of 4.88% beat Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.62%.

Entra ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $94.67 which suggests that it could grow by 50.72%. Given that Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Entra ASA, analysts believe Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Entra ASA.

Entra ASA has a beta of 0.810, which suggesting that the stock is 19.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.284, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.381%.

Entra ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Entra ASA pays 34.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Entra ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Entra ASA quarterly revenues are $97.8M, which are smaller than Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $624.4M. Entra ASA's net income of $37.3M is higher than Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $5.7M. Notably, Entra ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.23x while Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Entra ASA is 5.90x versus 2.38x for Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaanapali Land LLC has a net margin of 38.1% compared to Entra ASA's net margin of -464.64%. Entra ASA's return on equity of 4.88% beat Kaanapali Land LLC's return on equity of -4.7%.

Entra ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kaanapali Land LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Entra ASA has higher upside potential than Kaanapali Land LLC, analysts believe Entra ASA is more attractive than Kaanapali Land LLC.

Entra ASA has a beta of 0.810, which suggesting that the stock is 19.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaanapali Land LLC has a beta of 0.131, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.947%.

Entra ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Kaanapali Land LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Entra ASA pays 34.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaanapali Land LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Entra ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Entra ASA quarterly revenues are $97.8M, which are larger than Kaanapali Land LLC quarterly revenues of $362K. Entra ASA's net income of $37.3M is higher than Kaanapali Land LLC's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Entra ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.23x while Kaanapali Land LLC's PE ratio is 94.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Entra ASA is 5.90x versus 29.72x for Kaanapali Land LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Global Services Group has a net margin of 38.1% compared to Entra ASA's net margin of --. Entra ASA's return on equity of 4.88% beat Resources Global Services Group's return on equity of --.

Entra ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Resources Global Services Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Entra ASA has higher upside potential than Resources Global Services Group, analysts believe Entra ASA is more attractive than Resources Global Services Group.

Entra ASA has a beta of 0.810, which suggesting that the stock is 19.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Global Services Group has a beta of -6.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 764.255%.

Entra ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Resources Global Services Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Entra ASA pays 34.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Global Services Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Entra ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Entra ASA quarterly revenues are $97.8M, which are larger than Resources Global Services Group quarterly revenues of --. Entra ASA's net income of $37.3M is higher than Resources Global Services Group's net income of --. Notably, Entra ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.23x while Resources Global Services Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Entra ASA is 5.90x versus 20,661.35x for Resources Global Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.