ENRT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brazil Potash Corp has a net margin of -- compared to Enertopia's net margin of --. Enertopia's return on equity of -- beat Brazil Potash Corp's return on equity of --.

Enertopia has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1496.52%. On the other hand Brazil Potash Corp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enertopia has higher upside potential than Brazil Potash Corp, analysts believe Enertopia is more attractive than Brazil Potash Corp.

Enertopia has a beta of -0.535, which suggesting that the stock is 153.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brazil Potash Corp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enertopia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brazil Potash Corp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enertopia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brazil Potash Corp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enertopia quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Brazil Potash Corp quarterly revenues of --. Enertopia's net income of -$153.7K is higher than Brazil Potash Corp's net income of --. Notably, Enertopia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Brazil Potash Corp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enertopia is 74.68x versus -- for Brazil Potash Corp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty has a net margin of -- compared to Enertopia's net margin of -124.64%. Enertopia's return on equity of -- beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -3.65%.

Enertopia has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1496.52%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.21 which suggests that it could grow by 158.74%. Given that Enertopia has higher upside potential than Gold Royalty, analysts believe Enertopia is more attractive than Gold Royalty.

Enertopia has a beta of -0.535, which suggesting that the stock is 153.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enertopia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Enertopia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -9.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Enertopia quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Enertopia's net income of -$153.7K is lower than Gold Royalty's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Enertopia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enertopia is 74.68x versus 24.56x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loop Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Enertopia's net margin of -21039.13%. Enertopia's return on equity of -- beat Loop Industries's return on equity of -138.36%.

Enertopia has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1496.52%. On the other hand Loop Industries has an analysts' consensus of $4.70 which suggests that it could grow by 294.96%. Given that Enertopia has higher upside potential than Loop Industries, analysts believe Enertopia is more attractive than Loop Industries.

Enertopia has a beta of -0.535, which suggesting that the stock is 153.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loop Industries has a beta of 1.574, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.352%.

Enertopia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Loop Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enertopia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Loop Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enertopia quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Loop Industries quarterly revenues of $23K. Enertopia's net income of -$153.7K is higher than Loop Industries's net income of -$4.8M. Notably, Enertopia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Loop Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enertopia is 74.68x versus 565.73x for Loop Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NioCorp Developments has a net margin of -- compared to Enertopia's net margin of --. Enertopia's return on equity of -- beat NioCorp Developments's return on equity of --.

Enertopia has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1496.52%. On the other hand NioCorp Developments has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 448.39%. Given that Enertopia has higher upside potential than NioCorp Developments, analysts believe Enertopia is more attractive than NioCorp Developments.

Enertopia has a beta of -0.535, which suggesting that the stock is 153.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NioCorp Developments has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.892%.

Enertopia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NioCorp Developments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enertopia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NioCorp Developments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enertopia quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NioCorp Developments quarterly revenues of --. Enertopia's net income of -$153.7K is higher than NioCorp Developments's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Enertopia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NioCorp Developments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enertopia is 74.68x versus 3,671.04x for NioCorp Developments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.