EHMEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Credit Acceptance Corp. has a net margin of 7.52% compared to goeasy Ltd.'s net margin of 18.58%. goeasy Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.43% beat Credit Acceptance Corp.'s return on equity of 27.54%.

goeasy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Credit Acceptance Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $458.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.61%. Given that Credit Acceptance Corp. has higher upside potential than goeasy Ltd., analysts believe Credit Acceptance Corp. is more attractive than goeasy Ltd..

goeasy Ltd. has a beta of 2.669, which suggesting that the stock is 166.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Credit Acceptance Corp. has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.171%.

goeasy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. Credit Acceptance Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. goeasy Ltd. pays 28.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Credit Acceptance Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. goeasy Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

goeasy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $319.6M, which are smaller than Credit Acceptance Corp. quarterly revenues of $582.4M. goeasy Ltd.'s net income of $24M is lower than Credit Acceptance Corp.'s net income of $108.2M. Notably, goeasy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.27x while Credit Acceptance Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for goeasy Ltd. is 1.31x versus 2.47x for Credit Acceptance Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chesswood Group Ltd. has a net margin of 7.52% compared to goeasy Ltd.'s net margin of -16.32%. goeasy Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.43% beat Chesswood Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -17.44%.

goeasy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chesswood Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that goeasy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Chesswood Group Ltd., analysts believe goeasy Ltd. is more attractive than Chesswood Group Ltd..

goeasy Ltd. has a beta of 2.669, which suggesting that the stock is 166.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chesswood Group Ltd. has a beta of -1,814.940, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 181593.967%.

goeasy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. Chesswood Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. goeasy Ltd. pays 28.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Chesswood Group Ltd. pays out -32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. goeasy Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

goeasy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $319.6M, which are larger than Chesswood Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $28.2M. goeasy Ltd.'s net income of $24M is higher than Chesswood Group Ltd.'s net income of -$4.6M. Notably, goeasy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.27x while Chesswood Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for goeasy Ltd. is 1.31x versus 0.00x for Chesswood Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. has a net margin of 7.52% compared to goeasy Ltd.'s net margin of 4.48%. goeasy Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.43% beat Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.55%.

goeasy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 63.4%. Given that Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than goeasy Ltd., analysts believe Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. is more attractive than goeasy Ltd..

goeasy Ltd. has a beta of 2.669, which suggesting that the stock is 166.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.069%.

goeasy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. goeasy Ltd. pays 28.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. goeasy Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

goeasy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $319.6M, which are larger than Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $108.4M. goeasy Ltd.'s net income of $24M is higher than Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.'s net income of $4.9M. Notably, goeasy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.27x while Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for goeasy Ltd. is 1.31x versus 0.53x for Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pineapple Financial has a net margin of 7.52% compared to goeasy Ltd.'s net margin of -13.04%. goeasy Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.43% beat Pineapple Financial's return on equity of -232.14%.

goeasy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pineapple Financial has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5747.95%. Given that Pineapple Financial has higher upside potential than goeasy Ltd., analysts believe Pineapple Financial is more attractive than goeasy Ltd..

goeasy Ltd. has a beta of 2.669, which suggesting that the stock is 166.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pineapple Financial has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

goeasy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. Pineapple Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. goeasy Ltd. pays 28.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Pineapple Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. goeasy Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

goeasy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $319.6M, which are larger than Pineapple Financial quarterly revenues of $4.6M. goeasy Ltd.'s net income of $24M is higher than Pineapple Financial's net income of -$595.5K. Notably, goeasy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.27x while Pineapple Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for goeasy Ltd. is 1.31x versus 0.03x for Pineapple Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.