CPSS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Credit Acceptance has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Consumer Portfolio Services's net margin of 14.5%. Consumer Portfolio Services's return on equity of 7.67% beat Credit Acceptance's return on equity of 11.41%.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 70.13%. On the other hand Credit Acceptance has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -9.02%. Given that Consumer Portfolio Services has higher upside potential than Credit Acceptance, analysts believe Consumer Portfolio Services is more attractive than Credit Acceptance.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a beta of 1.992, which suggesting that the stock is 99.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Credit Acceptance has a beta of 1.456, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.647%.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Credit Acceptance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consumer Portfolio Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Credit Acceptance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consumer Portfolio Services quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are smaller than Credit Acceptance quarterly revenues of $543.6M. Consumer Portfolio Services's net income of $4.8M is lower than Credit Acceptance's net income of $78.8M. Notably, Consumer Portfolio Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.16x while Credit Acceptance's PE ratio is 31.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consumer Portfolio Services is 1.29x versus 2.85x for Credit Acceptance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IF Bancorp has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Consumer Portfolio Services's net margin of 10.16%. Consumer Portfolio Services's return on equity of 7.67% beat IF Bancorp's return on equity of 2.68%.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 70.13%. On the other hand IF Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Consumer Portfolio Services has higher upside potential than IF Bancorp, analysts believe Consumer Portfolio Services is more attractive than IF Bancorp.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a beta of 1.992, which suggesting that the stock is 99.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IF Bancorp has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.277%.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IF Bancorp offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Consumer Portfolio Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IF Bancorp pays out 71.45% of its earnings as a dividend. IF Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Consumer Portfolio Services quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are larger than IF Bancorp quarterly revenues of $6.2M. Consumer Portfolio Services's net income of $4.8M is higher than IF Bancorp's net income of $633K. Notably, Consumer Portfolio Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.16x while IF Bancorp's PE ratio is 37.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consumer Portfolio Services is 1.29x versus 3.19x for IF Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Card Group has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Consumer Portfolio Services's net margin of 1.04%. Consumer Portfolio Services's return on equity of 7.67% beat CPI Card Group's return on equity of --.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 70.13%. On the other hand CPI Card Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.64%. Given that Consumer Portfolio Services has higher upside potential than CPI Card Group, analysts believe Consumer Portfolio Services is more attractive than CPI Card Group.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a beta of 1.992, which suggesting that the stock is 99.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Card Group has a beta of 1.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.03%.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Card Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consumer Portfolio Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Card Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consumer Portfolio Services quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are smaller than CPI Card Group quarterly revenues of $124.8M. Consumer Portfolio Services's net income of $4.8M is higher than CPI Card Group's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Consumer Portfolio Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.16x while CPI Card Group's PE ratio is 25.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consumer Portfolio Services is 1.29x versus 0.85x for CPI Card Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sezzle has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Consumer Portfolio Services's net margin of 22.08%. Consumer Portfolio Services's return on equity of 7.67% beat Sezzle's return on equity of 154.86%.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 70.13%. On the other hand Sezzle has an analysts' consensus of $366.00 which suggests that it could grow by 43.11%. Given that Consumer Portfolio Services has higher upside potential than Sezzle, analysts believe Consumer Portfolio Services is more attractive than Sezzle.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a beta of 1.992, which suggesting that the stock is 99.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sezzle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sezzle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consumer Portfolio Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sezzle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consumer Portfolio Services quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are smaller than Sezzle quarterly revenues of $70M. Consumer Portfolio Services's net income of $4.8M is lower than Sezzle's net income of $15.4M. Notably, Consumer Portfolio Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.16x while Sezzle's PE ratio is 27.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consumer Portfolio Services is 1.29x versus 6.82x for Sezzle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.