Why Did SoundHound AI Stock Go Up?
SoundHound AI (NASDAQ:SOUN) has moved higher in recent days, breaking…
Sell
11
ECDA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.01
Seasonality move
:
-13.16%
Day range:
$0.01 - $0.01
52-week range:
$0.01 - $197.72
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.00x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2M
Avg. volume:
6.9M
1-year change:
-99.99%
Market cap:
$16.8K
Revenue:
$25.2M
EPS (TTM):
-$54.94
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ECDA
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $5.00 |
|
F
Ford Motor Co.
|
$41.8B | $0.18 | -2.4% | 104.43% | $13.76 |
|
FFAI
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.
|
$70K | -$0.58 | -77.85% | -283.2% | $5.00 |
|
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
|
$473.1M | -$2.63 | 117.37% | -788.7% | $17.06 |
|
WKHS
Workhorse Group, Inc.
|
$2.5M | -$17.40 | 29.88% | -47.63% | $0.65 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ECDA
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.
|
$0.01 | $5.00 | $16.8K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
|
F
Ford Motor Co.
|
$13.71 | $13.76 | $54.6B | 11.76x | $0.15 | 4.38% | 0.29x |
|
FFAI
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.
|
$1.03 | $5.00 | $174.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 155.84x |
|
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
|
$11.47 | $17.06 | $3.5B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 17.48x |
|
WKHS
Workhorse Group, Inc.
|
$5.13 | $0.65 | $11.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.31x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ECDA
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.
|
3552.04% | 2.700 | 46.66% | 0.08x |
|
F
Ford Motor Co.
|
77.62% | 0.297 | 345.17% | 0.94x |
|
FFAI
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.
|
231.93% | 1.166 | 55.13% | 0.33x |
|
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
|
43.06% | -0.200 | 30.48% | 1.18x |
|
WKHS
Workhorse Group, Inc.
|
62.77% | 5.696 | 230.98% | 0.66x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ECDA
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.
|
-$1.7M | -$5.1M | -817.68% | -- | -88.03% | -$1.7M |
|
F
Ford Motor Co.
|
$4.5B | $1.6B | 2.3% | 10.43% | 3.25% | $5.3B |
|
FFAI
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.
|
-$34.2M | -$66.9M | -252.83% | -553.9% | -180889.19% | -$37.1M |
|
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
|
-$333.6M | -$942M | -32.82% | -52.42% | -279.88% | -$955.6M |
|
WKHS
Workhorse Group, Inc.
|
-$7.7M | -$16.6M | -88.55% | -181.65% | -694.17% | -$11M |
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ECDA or F?
Ford Motor Co. has a net margin of 38.61% compared to E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s net margin of 4.84%. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Ford Motor Co.'s return on equity of 10.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ECDAE.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.-29.34% $2.10 $389.3K FFord Motor Co.8.94% $0.60 $211.8B -
What do Analysts Say About ECDA or F?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8255493.16%. On the other hand Ford Motor Co. has an analysts' consensus of $13.76 which suggests that it could grow by 0.38%. Given that E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ford Motor Co., analysts believe E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. is more attractive than Ford Motor Co..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ECDAE.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.1 0 0 FFord Motor Co.1 16 1 -
Is ECDA or F More Risky?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor Co. has a beta of 1.621, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.121%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ECDA or F?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ford Motor Co. offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor Co. pays out 53.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ECDA or F?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than Ford Motor Co. quarterly revenues of $50.5B. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M is lower than Ford Motor Co.'s net income of $2.4B. Notably, E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ford Motor Co.'s PE ratio is 11.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. is 0.00x versus 0.29x for Ford Motor Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ECDAE.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.0.00x -- $5.8M $2.2M FFord Motor Co.0.29x 11.76x $50.5B $2.4B
-
Which has Higher Returns ECDA or FFAI?
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a net margin of 38.61% compared to E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s net margin of -600505.41%. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s return on equity of -553.9%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ECDAE.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.-29.34% $2.10 $389.3K FFAIFaraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.-92483.78% -$1.55 $97.1M -
What do Analysts Say About ECDA or FFAI?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8255493.16%. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 385.44%. Given that E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has higher upside potential than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc., analysts believe E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. is more attractive than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ECDAE.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.1 0 0 FFAIFaraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is ECDA or FFAI More Risky?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a beta of 5.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 406.231%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ECDA or FFAI?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ECDA or FFAI?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. quarterly revenues of $37K. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M is higher than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s net income of -$222.2M. Notably, E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. is 0.00x versus 155.84x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ECDAE.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.0.00x -- $5.8M $2.2M FFAIFaraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.155.84x -- $37K -$222.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns ECDA or LCID?
Lucid Group, Inc. has a net margin of 38.61% compared to E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s net margin of -290.7%. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ECDAE.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.-29.34% $2.10 $389.3K LCIDLucid Group, Inc.-99.12% -$3.31 $6.5B -
What do Analysts Say About ECDA or LCID?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8255493.16%. On the other hand Lucid Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.06 which suggests that it could grow by 48.7%. Given that E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, Inc., analysts believe E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. is more attractive than Lucid Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ECDAE.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.1 0 0 LCIDLucid Group, Inc.1 7 1 -
Is ECDA or LCID More Risky?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.157%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ECDA or LCID?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ECDA or LCID?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $336.6M. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M is higher than Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M. Notably, E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. is 0.00x versus 17.48x for Lucid Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ECDAE.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.0.00x -- $5.8M $2.2M LCIDLucid Group, Inc.17.48x -- $336.6M -$978.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns ECDA or WKHS?
Workhorse Group, Inc. has a net margin of 38.61% compared to E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s net margin of -328.21%. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Workhorse Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -181.65%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ECDAE.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.-29.34% $2.10 $389.3K WKHSWorkhorse Group, Inc.-323.17% -$6.05 $86.1M -
What do Analysts Say About ECDA or WKHS?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8255493.16%. On the other hand Workhorse Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $0.65 which suggests that it could grow by 52.05%. Given that E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, Inc., analysts believe E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. is more attractive than Workhorse Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ECDAE.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.1 0 0 WKHSWorkhorse Group, Inc.0 2 0 -
Is ECDA or WKHS More Risky?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.413, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 141.336%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ECDA or WKHS?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ECDA or WKHS?
E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are larger than Workhorse Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4M. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M is higher than Workhorse Group, Inc.'s net income of -$7.8M. Notably, E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. is 0.00x versus 0.31x for Workhorse Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ECDAE.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.0.00x -- $5.8M $2.2M WKHSWorkhorse Group, Inc.0.31x -- $2.4M -$7.8M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Goldman Sachs Going to Go Up?
Shares of financial giant Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) have soared by…
How High Will MSTR Stock Go?
After several months of pressure, shares of Bitcoin treasury Strategy…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Sell
48
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
59
RGC alert for Jan 23
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is down 2.5% over the past day.
Buy
76
HYMC alert for Jan 23
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. [HYMC] is up 7.8% over the past day.
Sell
24
INSP alert for Jan 23
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. [INSP] is down 0.36% over the past day.
