DUFRY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aptiv Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Avolta AG's net margin of -6.75%. Avolta AG's return on equity of 5.12% beat Aptiv Plc's return on equity of 3.28%.

Avolta AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aptiv Plc has an analysts' consensus of $99.81 which suggests that it could grow by 27.49%. Given that Aptiv Plc has higher upside potential than Avolta AG, analysts believe Aptiv Plc is more attractive than Avolta AG.

Avolta AG has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.684% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aptiv Plc has a beta of 1.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.357%.

Avolta AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aptiv Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avolta AG pays 120.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Aptiv Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Avolta AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Aptiv Plc quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Avolta AG's net income of -- is lower than Aptiv Plc's net income of -$352M. Notably, Avolta AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.28x while Aptiv Plc's PE ratio is 62.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avolta AG is 0.53x versus 0.88x for Aptiv Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has a net margin of -- compared to Avolta AG's net margin of --. Avolta AG's return on equity of 5.12% beat Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's return on equity of 12.76%.

Avolta AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has an analysts' consensus of $22.39 which suggests that it could grow by 6.25%. Given that Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has higher upside potential than Avolta AG, analysts believe Compagnie Financière Richemont SA is more attractive than Avolta AG.

Avolta AG has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.684% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has a beta of 1.216, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.571%.

Avolta AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Avolta AG pays 120.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA pays out -45.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

Avolta AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Compagnie Financière Richemont SA quarterly revenues of --. Avolta AG's net income of -- is lower than Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's net income of --. Notably, Avolta AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.28x while Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's PE ratio is 32.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avolta AG is 0.53x versus 4.13x for Compagnie Financière Richemont SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Avolta AG's net margin of 8.54%. Avolta AG's return on equity of 5.12% beat Garrett Motion, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Avolta AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Garrett Motion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.80 which suggests that it could grow by 19.61%. Given that Garrett Motion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Avolta AG, analysts believe Garrett Motion, Inc. is more attractive than Avolta AG.

Avolta AG has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.684% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Garrett Motion, Inc. has a beta of 0.227, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.297%.

Avolta AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Garrett Motion, Inc. offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Avolta AG pays 120.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion, Inc. pays out 4.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Avolta AG's is not.

Avolta AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Garrett Motion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $902M. Avolta AG's net income of -- is lower than Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net income of $77M. Notably, Avolta AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.28x while Garrett Motion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avolta AG is 0.53x versus 1.02x for Garrett Motion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

On Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Avolta AG's net margin of 14.97%. Avolta AG's return on equity of 5.12% beat On Holding AG's return on equity of 15.78%.

Avolta AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand On Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of $62.37 which suggests that it could grow by 27.97%. Given that On Holding AG has higher upside potential than Avolta AG, analysts believe On Holding AG is more attractive than Avolta AG.

Avolta AG has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.684% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison On Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Avolta AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. On Holding AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avolta AG pays 120.76% of its earnings as a dividend. On Holding AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Avolta AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than On Holding AG quarterly revenues of $992.6M. Avolta AG's net income of -- is lower than On Holding AG's net income of $148.6M. Notably, Avolta AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.28x while On Holding AG's PE ratio is 61.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avolta AG is 0.53x versus 4.74x for On Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.