DFRYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autoneum Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Avolta AG's net margin of --. Avolta AG's return on equity of 5.12% beat Autoneum Holding AG's return on equity of 9.29%.

Avolta AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Autoneum Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Avolta AG has higher upside potential than Autoneum Holding AG, analysts believe Avolta AG is more attractive than Autoneum Holding AG.

Avolta AG has a beta of 1.140, which suggesting that the stock is 14.016% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autoneum Holding AG has a beta of -0.102, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.192%.

Avolta AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.61%. Autoneum Holding AG offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share. Avolta AG pays 143.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Autoneum Holding AG pays out 31.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Autoneum Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Avolta AG's is not.

Avolta AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Autoneum Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Avolta AG's net income of -- is lower than Autoneum Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Avolta AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.68x while Autoneum Holding AG's PE ratio is 15.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avolta AG is 0.52x versus 0.40x for Autoneum Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Avolta AG's net margin of 9.43%. Avolta AG's return on equity of 5.12% beat Garrett Motion, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Avolta AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Garrett Motion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.20 which suggests that it could grow by 20.59%. Given that Garrett Motion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Avolta AG, analysts believe Garrett Motion, Inc. is more attractive than Avolta AG.

Avolta AG has a beta of 1.140, which suggesting that the stock is 14.016% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Garrett Motion, Inc. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.03%.

Avolta AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.61%. Garrett Motion, Inc. offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Avolta AG pays 143.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion, Inc. pays out 13.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Avolta AG's is not.

Avolta AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Garrett Motion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $891M. Avolta AG's net income of -- is lower than Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net income of $84M. Notably, Avolta AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.68x while Garrett Motion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avolta AG is 0.52x versus 1.03x for Garrett Motion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

On Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Avolta AG's net margin of 9.29%. Avolta AG's return on equity of 5.12% beat On Holding AG's return on equity of 13.91%.

Avolta AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand On Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of $56.18 which suggests that it could grow by 70.03%. Given that On Holding AG has higher upside potential than Avolta AG, analysts believe On Holding AG is more attractive than Avolta AG.

Avolta AG has a beta of 1.140, which suggesting that the stock is 14.016% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison On Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Avolta AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.61%. On Holding AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avolta AG pays 143.23% of its earnings as a dividend. On Holding AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Avolta AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than On Holding AG quarterly revenues of $930.7M. Avolta AG's net income of -- is lower than On Holding AG's net income of $86.5M. Notably, Avolta AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.68x while On Holding AG's PE ratio is 42.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avolta AG is 0.52x versus 2.87x for On Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.